Welcome!

Join our community of MMO enthusiasts and game developers! By registering, you'll gain access to discussions on the latest developments in MMO server files and collaborate with like-minded individuals. Join us today and unlock the potential of MMO server development!

Join Today!

Question the TSA at your own Risk

Joined
Nov 14, 2001
Messages
29,436
Reaction score
21,649
The TSA chose Meg McLain for special screening. They wanted her to go through the new porno-scanners. When she opted out, TSA agents raised an enormous ruckus. When she asked some question about what they planned to do to her, they flipped out. TSA agents yelled at her, handcuffed her to a chair, ripped up her ticket, called in 12 local Miami cops and finally escorted her out of the airport. Listen to her story as she told it on radio show Free Talk Live last night. Things are truly getting scary.

Audio;
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,060
Reaction score
1,573
Again, a huge uproar caused by a bunch of Americans stuck up on what their "rights" are. Who Ducking cares, it's not like the image is even clear enough for someone to be able to see your persona details, you really are flattering yourself if you think someone's gonna print it out to go beat off on their lunch break. Bunch of Ducking babies, they always need to find something to cry about.
 
Found a place to live.
Loyal Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Messages
2,161
Reaction score
235
Again, a huge uproar caused by a bunch of Americans stuck up on what their "rights" are. Who Ducking cares, it's not like the image is even clear enough for someone to be able to see your persona details, you really are flattering yourself if you think someone's gonna print it out to go beat off on their lunch break. Bunch of Ducking babies, they always need to find something to cry about.
And once the system gets introduced to other parts of the world, people there will be in just as much of an uproar.
 
Custom Title Activated
Loyal Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
171
Again, a huge uproar caused by a bunch of Americans stuck up on what their "rights" are. Who Ducking cares, it's not like the image is even clear enough for someone to be able to see your persona details, you really are flattering yourself if you think someone's gonna print it out to go beat off on their lunch break. Bunch of Ducking babies, they always need to find something to cry about.

There was a case recently where a TSA security guard used the machine and his co-workers made fun of him so much over the size of his penis that he ended up beating one of them with a police baton in a car park.

Evidently, a) you can see personal details, and b) at least some of the people operating these machines are arseholes.
 
Found a place to live.
Loyal Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Messages
2,161
Reaction score
235
There was a case recently where a TSA security guard used the machine and his co-workers made fun of him so much over the size of his penis that he ended up beating one of them with a police baton in a car park.

Evidently, a) you can see personal details, and b) at least some of the people operating these machines are arseholes.

Sauce ~

And many images such as ones from have appeared around the internet, showing a test screening image being inverted to near good quality. As well as with time the images will only get clearer and sharper.
 
Last edited:
Ginger by design.
Loyal Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,340
Reaction score
653
You guys must forget the fiasco about the images being easily downloadable into external media and that we're already seeing abuses people say "won't happen." I, for one, feel sorry for the people operating these things in the US considering how ugly most people are. You'd think "may involuntarily vomit due to graphic images" would be part of the warning on the job description there. But it's still a massive invasion of privacy made for the sake of "security" when in reality it's not effective nor necessary.

If terrorists really wanted to attack us in the USA, they're not going to try to do it with airplanes. Honestly, a bomb in a paper bag at a mall is going to generate far more fear than an airplane exploding. I don't know about you but I go to stores far more often than I fly on airplanes. You see how the priorities here are incredibly backwards? I can walk into a mall without so much as walking through a metal detector. We have to basically take nudie pics to get on an airplane. What the fail?


Also, clearly she is a terrorist. She doesn't want an invasive search done, which is her right, so she must be a terrorist. "You have nothing to hide if you're innocent" -- fascism.

I'll also be checking my car daily for FBI bugs following this post. Because the exact same comment resulted in some kid getting a bug put on his car. lol. I have to say, FBI, if that's really how you conduct business, then I understand how 9/11 could be easy to pull off; you're retarded, all of you.
 
bleh....
Loyal Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
2,898
Reaction score
1,129
Again, a huge uproar caused by a bunch of Americans stuck up on what their "rights" are. Who Ducking cares, it's not like the image is even clear enough for someone to be able to see your persona details, you really are flattering yourself if you think someone's gonna print it out to go beat off on their lunch break. Bunch of Ducking babies, they always need to find something to cry about.

You walk through it then and tell us how much safer you feel for doing it. The machine, despite popular belief, is not 100% effective. It's just a new advanced thing for them to test. So tell me, what's the next step? If a school is blown up, we'll have to walk through these machines to go to school? Will we have to walk through these things to go to a court room, library, or any government building? Why force us to wear any clothes at all then? I mean... safety first right? I could be walking down the street and pass a bomber two blocks from my house, but if he was naked, I bet I could tell if he had a bomb, right? The fact that you even disagree with someone denying another person the "right" to literally view their physical body in the name of "safety"... because metal detectors, drug seeking dogs, trace detection machines, and pat downs aren't enough... it's unbelievable. I'm not sure if you're actually serious or not. If you are serious then wow...
 
Custom Title Activated
Loyal Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
171
crappy deal for her.

But that site seems to consist of a bunch of whiny assholes. Boohoo, xray scanning. Damn hippies.

Also this is pretty hilarious coming from a 9/11 truther. I hope you understand why.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2007
Messages
2,795
Reaction score
480
I'll also be checking my car daily for FBI bugs following this post. Because the exact same comment resulted in some kid getting a bug put on his car. lol. I have to say, FBI, if that's really how you conduct business, then I understand how 9/11 could be easy to pull off; you're retarded, all of you.

I don't know how people can trust their own government agencies.

You only have to look at the CIA and how they ran experiments in brothels with LSD, ran drug houses and so on, but hardly anything happens. The world is so fucked imo, no government (well here at least) would do a inquest into the that catholic church even though countless pedophile priests, school teachers etc - too Ducking scared to do an inquest because they'll end up losing votes in the next election.
 
Catz
Loyal Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
1,432
Reaction score
204
You walk through it then and tell us how much safer you feel for doing it. The machine, despite popular belief, is not 100% effective. It's just a new advanced thing for them to test. So tell me, what's the next step? If a school is blown up, we'll have to walk through these machines to go to school? Will we have to walk through these things to go to a court room, library, or any government building? Why force us to wear any clothes at all then? I mean... safety first right? I could be walking down the street and pass a bomber two blocks from my house, but if he was naked, I bet I could tell if he had a bomb, right? The fact that you even disagree with someone denying another person the "right" to literally view their physical body in the name of "safety"... because metal detectors, drug seeking dogs, trace detection machines, and pat downs aren't enough... it's unbelievable. I'm not sure if you're actually serious or not. If you are serious then wow...
Are you attempting to sound logical or purposely posting irrelevant scenarios?
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
20,037
Reaction score
1,845
more rape of our rights, people being lined up and treated like they are already guilty

i cba looking for the article atm but it was saying how the scanners wouldnt even have picked up on any of the "recent terror attacks". It can see metal objects and pick up on dense things like c4 but not smaller objects, a well made plastic knife for example wouldn't be caught, liquids and powders don't get picked up. What's with that pose they force people into.

ven i gotta agree with trouble this time
 
Custom Title Activated
Loyal Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
171
That's your perspective. And needless to say, this is an entirely different subject. Bring this up again, and I will Ducking end you.

No, they are directly related. It's the same topic. Sorry you don't understand.
 
Found a place to live.
Loyal Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Messages
2,161
Reaction score
235
more rape of our rights, people being lined up and treated like they are already guilty

i cba looking for the article atm but it was saying how the scanners wouldnt even have picked up on any of the "recent terror attacks". It can see metal objects and pick up on dense things like c4 but not smaller objects, a well made plastic knife for example wouldn't be caught, liquids and powders don't get picked up. What's with that pose they force people into.

ven i gotta agree with trouble this time

It picks up breast implants though.

 
bleh....
Loyal Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
2,898
Reaction score
1,129
Are you attempting to sound logical or purposely posting irrelevant scenarios?

I fail to see how it's irrelevant. It may have been slightly blown out of proportion, but it is far from irrelevant. They are doing this because of one successful hijacking. Would they do the same if a government building was bombed? So you would have to walk through one of these to mail a letter or go to class? Where's the scanners on city buses? They've been blown up and hijacked far more often than airplanes. The same amount of damage could be done with a bus as an airplane if it was properly planned out like 9/11 was, be it by terrorists or the government. It's pathetic how some people view a person defending themselves from being fully exposed in the name of "safety" as being a crybaby. If you ask me, it's a shenanigans excuse to force the people to fund yet another "Einstein" idea by the retards in office. And no... I'm not a conspiracy theorist.


I can see it now...


[extremeExaggeration]
Government: Hey citizens! We have introduced a new system for you. When you walk into an airport, you are immediately subject to a full out strip search. Upon entering, you are to proceed to remove all of your clothes and form a line. Yes ladies, this includes your bra and panties too (hope you're not wearing a tampon hehe). Every 1-3 persons in line will be subject to a "super special safety examination". We will be performing an in-depth search which may include some probing into one or more orifices. Your children and grandchildren will be searched as well due to terrorists recruiting them at a very young age. Hell, if we believe it's necessary, we may even search your infants. I know, you may feel violated. You may think we are overstepping our boundaries, but remember... you'll be safe.
Citizens: .... FML
[/extremeExaggeration]


^^^ How's that for irrelevant? ^^^
 
bleh....
Loyal Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
2,898
Reaction score
1,129
You lot might have something to worry about with a full body scanner, but I don't!

Where are you from? I'm assuming somewhere near GB because you used the word "lot". Most of my Brit friends use that word a lot. Anyways, did you know they are also going to be setting it up there? :(
 
Back
Top