for overclock best is AMD i think, i tryed with Semron on 1.6 2.6+ to 2.9Ghz with MSI sup board, it was not stable but verry hight, stable at 2.4ghz, but if meth is not MSI u can't clock it more than 2.3 or 2.4 and a verry big COOLING FAN (or wather fan.)
Wow... I can clock a 1.8ghz C2D to 3.5-3.7ghz if I wanted to and it'll be STABLE.
Now how is AMD better for overclocking? They were back a few years ago. The Athlon XP was a great and easy to overclock CPU and so was the early A64 ones.
Now they are very limited as most run at max speed.
With the Core 2 Duos you can easily get 100% OC on the low end ones and over 50% OC on the high end ones. AMD's cannot do that at all.
And MSI boards are not the best for overclocking. My top of the line MSI board cannot even handle overclocking and my old top of the line one for the A64 processors couldn't overclock nearly as high as my DFI boards for the same processors.
6 ghz blahah, who will say it ?
AMD have processors released with 4 middles with alot cache.
Intel also have but,
4 middles? What are you talking about you noob? Do you mean cores? If that's the case AMD doesn't have a 4 core CPU. They will be releasing a 4 core one for the server/workstation market next Fall and next year you'll see it for the desktop.
What do u think for Hyper Transport? does AMD's HT = Intel's Hyper Threading?
When did I ever say that you dope?
answer is NO, when u enable Htransport from the Bios on AMD processor it gets a Hight Bandwich transport.
You don't enable it. It's a built in memory controller on the CPU itself.
And what is
hight bandwcih transport? You are making up words now aren't you.
It's called Hyper Transport. And basically it is increased bandwidth between the memory and CPU as data doesn't need to go thought the chipset to reach the CPU as it directly goes to it.
Intels Hthreading gets like 1 more processor, but it makes only Lag, i am telling it to you koz i have seed AMD and INTEL 1vss1 , with my friends we maked lots of test (procsts) , and intel geted only 7 from 20 test on alot of programs. but, if you convert videos it takes 50% if thr is on, if not 90/100%,
You do realize that hyper threading has been out of CPUs since the PD came out. It was only used on the newer P4s and PD EE CPUs.
And it doesn't make it lag. It gives you the ability to use another thread at the same time. It does limits your overall performance to add the expandability.
And it is also obvious you have not even seen or use the new Intel processors. The Core and Core 2 series CPU's are the fastest out there.
As you told me to look at google I suggest you do the same as you can find tomes of reviews of the current Intel and AMD CPUs and you'll see who wins.
but that is only a fake, and u can't run MU and Video converter like mu will take 50% and video converter will take 50%, but when u paly its like 1 fps
.
That's not a CPU related problem but a video card related one. So you can't say it's because of the CPU. I have done video converting and payed a game on an HT enabled CPU and it made it nicer to run compared to when it was off.
And how do you call it a fake? It is a CPU that can handle 2 per core instead of 1. Nothing fake about that.
Also what do Intel have for live of their processors?, they have nothing, but almost All amd's have Therminal Throttling, it begins from 12.5%, so if your comp temperature gets hight this option takes some Mhz like for 50% it will take ~30% from cpu when it get hight temperature, it gets an empty cikles in ur processor, 1.6-30% = little lag, and for a little time ur temp is down.
You are joking right? Intel has had it in their notebook chips ever since AMD came out with the Cool'n'Quite technology that is thermal throttling.
And guess what? All 600 series P4 processors, PD processors, Core processors, and Core 2 processors supports thermal throttling and it's called Intel Speed Step.
If you wan the real Proof Take 2 CPU's (if u have money) with Good mb and almost = processors amd and intel, Simply, First test it with some Games and look the difference.:matrix:
Oh I have.
I have owned all of the following e6700, two 4800+, a 4000+, a P4 2.8b, a P4 2.4b, a PM 1.5ghz, and CD T2400.
So don't tell me what they can and can't do. I have use the P4, A64, A64 x2, PM, CD, and C2D extensively and know first hand that the current Intel chips are best.
Also double posting is against the rules.
dont u just hate when noobs rush in threads dont even read everything and just write random crap (like amd owns intel )because they r a fanboy
looks like this thread is full of them
and omg @ shang , never have i seen such ignorance
not even worth replying
ill just let nopeace do it (yet again)
It's so bloody annoying. He thinks he knows all about it because he has tested stuff from a few years ago. -.-
Sure they were best back then but compared to the CPU's of today they are just a joke.
He also has the nerve to tell me I'm wrong and start making up random names and saying who uber leet they are when they are not even real.
Not to mention he tells me to use google and find out the information. Hell if here were to use it. The first 5 sites that pop up will contradict all of his fan boyish talk. -.-
Anyways he is getting a warn for double posting.
NoPeace - out
