Quote: Originally Posted by
Phantom*
A typical arogant response. I always side for the idiot because if it wasn't for us idiots, non of this would exist.
Arrogance is certainly not the line I'm trying to take. If I didn't want people to learn to work with OPL's, I wouldn't have written a guide for quaternions. I respect inexperienced people who are willing to learn; I agree, without them, we wouldn't be here.
What I don't like at all is inexperienced people unwilling to learn anything new.
I understand your desire to simply be able to convert; I agree it would be much easier. I've done a bit more research, and I think a converter can be written as long as it does one axis at a time, one quaternion at a time using the multiplication method. All that remains is to see if someone will actually do it, and based on his posts, it seems Boarderkoen is.
Quote:
I'm not questioning why they are used, I'm questing why does the user have to interact with them when there are other means to do so. It should be just as easy for a 13 year to understand and work with as a mathematician, especially when it has a 150 price tag on it.
I wrote a guide that people who have a scientific or graphing calculator and a VERY basic understanding of sine and cosine (like, Geometry or Algebra I level) can work with quaternions. That falls approximately within your 13-year-old range.
I feel like I've done my part. I've explained the mathematics as best I can, and actually implementing that is now left up to the people here that can program. I'm currently taking a class in it, but I don't yet know enough to write this kind of program. I'm willing to learn how.