CentrinoGames - Minerva EP18

[GoldenHeaven]

Ah lol thats funny, who is working on that Niicke

 

[Niicke]

Ah lol thats funny, who is working on that Niicke

Just me for now :

I will give some advice to those who are working in Minerva: Keep in mind that it will be for studies only, the structure in which Minerva was built will not support players, it is not scalable, it has competition problems, among others

 

[GoldenHeaven]

Just me for now :

I will give some advice to those who are working in Minerva: Keep in mind that it will be for studies only, the structure in which Minerva was built will not support players, it is not scalable, it has competition problems, among others

Ive said this time and time again and others have said it too, people just want hope i guess.

 

[walkernight88]

Just me for now :

I will give some advice to those who are working in Minerva: Keep in mind that it will be for studies only, the structure in which Minerva was built will not support players, it is not scalable, it has competition problems, among others

I totally agree on that. Also compiling it from such a high level language would compromise performance. But on the other side, nowadays we have Coffee Lake and RTX's so...

Source wise, it looks pretty, never compiled it tho

 

[Niicke]

I totally agree on that. Also compiling it from such a high level language would compromise performance. But on the other side, nowadays we have Coffee Lake and RTX's so...

Source wise, it looks pretty, never compiled it tho

I believe that C# is enough to create a PLAYABLE version nowadays. Of course it will NEVER be the same as C++ performance.
I'm creating in .NET Core but there are things that the developer should pay attention like: multithreading ( concurrent objects ), parallelism (TPL) and the most (but no less): Garbage Collector.
So.. I believe it is possible, if you master these 3 subjects

 

[walkernight88]

.NET Core and Framework have a really nice ThreadPool mechanism. And by Garbage Collector, if you code, you must be really dumb to leave anything behind. At least when performance matters... (Long live Async and Await :w00t

I would code it in Swift (the Apple nowadays language). It's freaking fast and compiles directly on linux...

 

[emi]

I totally agree on that. Also compiling it from such a high level language would compromise performance. But on the other side, nowadays we have Coffee Lake and RTX's so...

Source wise, it looks pretty, never compiled it tho

Ahm, C# is more than decent performance-wise and has the necessary scale to deal with lots of players especially thinking that this can be deployed in clusters. I don't know why you brought up RTX in this case since it's server side and btw AMD came back with equally good if not better CPUs.
Compiling doesn't compromise runtime performance.

.NET Core and Framework have a really nice ThreadPool mechanism. And by Garbage Collector, if you code, you must be really dumb to leave anything behind. At least when performance matters... (Long live Async and Await :w00t

I would code it in Swift (the Apple nowadays language). It's freaking fast and compiles directly on linux...

No, most people don't understand how GC works and assume that it takes care of everything. It is actually not that hard to "forget" references of objects and end up with memory leaks.
I have never tried Swift but I suppose there are many ways to achieve the same thing

I'm creating in .NET Core but there are things that the developer should pay attention like: multithreading ( concurrent objects ), parallelism (TPL) and the most (but no less): Garbage Collector.
So.. I believe it is possible, if you master these 3 subjects

Which any decent developer should.

 

[Niicke]

Ahm, C# is more than decent performance-wise and has the necessary scale to deal with lots of players especially thinking that this can be deployed in clusters. I don't know why you brought up RTX in this case since it's server side and btw AMD came back with equally good if not better CPUs.
Compiling doesn't compromise runtime performance.

No, most people don't understand how GC works and assume that it takes care of everything. It is actually not that hard to "forget" references of objects and end up with memory leaks.
I have never tried Swift but I suppose there are many ways to achieve the same thing


Which any decent developer should.

Yes I agree.
I just said these things because they were misapplied in the Minerva, and some were not even applied eg. TPL

 

[emi]

That is indeed true, at the same time AFAIK this has not been developed by SDEs or a Studio so it is kind of expected. Everybody is learning

 

[walkernight88]

Compiling doesn't compromise runtime performance.

Hmmm... hmmmm...

That moment when a var increase in high level lang does 5 loops and 3 calls of asm subprocs :w00t:

 

[emi]

Hmmm... hmmmm...

That moment when a var increase in high level lang does 5 loops and 3 calls of asm subprocs :w00t:

Just to be clear, I was referring to AOT.
Obviously a high level language is nowhere as efficient as a low level language. Probably you meant compilation into machine code whereas I interpreted it as AOT.

 

[soewandi]

You must be registered to see links

someone help me pls

 

[soewandi]

You must be registered to see links

someone help me pls

im use cabal GSP ep22 client

 

[Niicke]

im use cabal GSP ep22 client

struct Channel {
	CHServerId: byte;
	ChannelId: byte;
	
	ChannelPlayersOnline: ushort;
	
	Empty2: byte[21];
	
	Unk1: byte;
	
	ChannelMaxPlayers: ushort;
	
	ChannelIP: byte[4];
	
	ChannelPort: ushort;

	ChannelType: int;
	
	Empty3: byte[4];
}

struct Server {
	ServerId: ushort;
	Empty1: byte[5];
	QtdChannels: byte;
	
	Channels: Channel[QtdChannels];
}

schema {
	Header: ServerHeader;
	
	QtdServers: byte;
	Servers: Server[QtdServers];
}

 

[karspersky]

how to fix this message when login and select channel?

"the channel cannot acommodate any mores player"?

 

[soewandi]

Sorry bro, i dont understand what you mean, can you tell me more details ?
I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?I don't understand what you mean, can you tell me more details?

 

[soewandi]

Sorry bro, i dont understand what you mean, can you tell me more details ?
Niicke



how to fix this ?
https://imgur.com/a/S9zzXNU

 

[Niicke]

Sorry bro, i dont understand what you mean, can you tell me more details ?
Niicke



how to fix this ?

You must be registered to see links

This is the current version of authentication packet structure, it's up to you to change that in Minerva

I strongly advise you to learn about TCP connection and data types first, otherwise you will be wasting your time here

 

[karspersky]

Help please...

You must be registered to see links

 

[soewandi]

can you tell me which one should ? I just want to play around, please help me solve this problem Niicke