View Poll Results: Do we need a STO/Cryptic Section

Voters
53. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, Yes, God Yes

    49 92.45%
  • No Forget STO and Forget you

    4 7.55%

[REQUEST] Cryptic Section

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35
  1. #16
    BEAST Cabal Owner TriEdge is offline
    Gold SubscriberRank
    Sep 2010 Join Date
    409Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section


    RaGEZONE Recommends

    RaGEZONE Recommends

    only interested in NW but i clicked yes :o

  2. #17
    ☺☺Just Ask The Pope☺☺ PopeJohnPaul is offline
    SubscriberRank
    Jul 2009 Join Date
    Ottawa CALocation
    528Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    when the server went down i thought it was gonna happen :( till i looked super sad face

  3. #18
    Moderator GigaToni is offline
    ModeratorRank
    Aug 2009 Join Date
    GER / FRLocation
    2,008Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    Why is this even a poll? Isn't the section creating decision made up on interest not on how many people want a section? I mean, just because the people how clicked no don't have interest in this game, shouldn't be a fact to say no to a section. (Thats how I see it.)

  4. #19
    Developer DNC is offline
    DeveloperRank
    Oct 2011 Join Date
    2,438Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    I slightly agree with that.
    I would had not made a (Yes/No) Poll, but instead an Interest Only Click Yes (modified version of a Poll).
    No secondary option.
    Last edited by DNC; 23-01-15 at 02:59 AM. Reason: cleaned out of kindness
    If you are talking to someone pretending to be me aka DNC, you're about to be scammed.
    Do not come to this forum complaining that you were scammed; when buying, selling, trading files is against forum rules.
    Don't point a finger at me, I am not talking with anyone.

  5. #20
    Certified Database Admin Jangan is offline
    DeveloperRank
    Jul 2007 Join Date
    Amman, JordanLocation
    2,136Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    Isnt there only one NWO server? And no one is able to compile the nwo files yet? -Publicly Speaking- or am i just not updated on the development of nwo..

    If my assumptions are correct, then we actually only need one section for STO, not cryptic .. although im pretty sure it will cause us a lot of heat to name a section after a very strong company.
    I Do not answer PM or Skype!
    I Do not have/buy/sell server files!

    !~Contribute Back To The Community~!
    Please
    Rep and Like the author!

  6. #21
    Moderator GigaToni is offline
    ModeratorRank
    Aug 2009 Join Date
    GER / FRLocation
    2,008Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    It doesn't matter that there is only one NWO Server :). We have the source code and it works. And it's not true that no one is able to compile it.

    I compiled it and sucessfully ran the server (Like I posted in this thread: http://forum.ragezone.com/f857/nwo-s...torial-1047042):
    NWO:

    NWO Character selection: http://i.imgur.com/c3n3vL5.png
    NWO Loading Server: http://i.imgur.com/0c2Y3Kp.jpg
    NWO Foundry: http://i.imgur.com/Bm455Nj.png
    I agree with the naming thing, but the games behind it (Names) are also strong so.. meh. Same thing if you name it StarTrek Online and Cryptic.
    Last edited by GigaToni; 23-01-15 at 04:13 AM.

  7. #22
    MMO Supervisor Biesmen is offline
    SupervisorRank
    Apr 2007 Join Date
    2,127Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    I voted no. I hate STO!

    JUST KIDDING! I'm a freaking Fleet Admiral on STO. I'm about to create a Klingon as well.
    I really want a Cryptic Section, but I voted no by accident. Please, forgive me!
    Forum Rules | Account Support | Subscribe
    RaGEZONE Facebook

    "The reason why people give up so fast is because they tend to look at how far they still have to go, instead of how far they have gotten."

  8. #23
    GET OVER HERE! MentaL is offline
      Administrator  Rank
    Jan 2001 Join Date
    32,914Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    Looking promising although each individual game would have its own section, permitting what is available to the end user, so... to speed this process up list each individual title and what is currently available for it and the progression and i can evaluate it all a bit quicker, who knows.. maybe a section could be made within a week.
    RaGEZONE Recommends

  9. #24
    Developer DNC is offline
    DeveloperRank
    Oct 2011 Join Date
    2,438Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    Quote Originally Posted by MentaL View Post
    Looking promising although each individual game would have its own section, permitting what is available to the end user, so... to speed this process up list each individual title and what is currently available for it and the progression and i can evaluate it all a bit quicker, who knows.. maybe a section could be made within a week.
    There are only 2 of the 3 Cryptic Projects that work at the moment.
    NWO is not one of them.

    Ready for sectioin:
    1. STO - proven to work from source or as a repack.
    (Based on individual sections being mentioned STO has the greatest chance to flourish at the moment)
    2. Core - a base, yet empty game world, strictly for the jump off point of any game a developer would wish to create.
    (Based on individual sections being mentioned Core would truly only be used by maybe 5 people.)

    There is a 2000 page document that shows damn near anything you could ever dream possible about All Cryptic Engine usage.
    Client/Server detailed information, FX, Animations, Sounds, Mission - Item - Costume - World - Terrain - blah blah editors in Great Detail.
    Among other information that currently I have no way to "completely" upload and will get as much out as possible (over 750 gb of "personal" notes / "personal" videos).

    PS: We had far less than this for Dragona bro. Just saying.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Biesmen View Post
    I voted no. I hate STO!

    JUST KIDDING! I'm a freaking Fleet Admiral on STO. I'm about to create a Klingon as well.
    I really want a Cryptic Section, but I voted no by accident. Please, forgive me!
    I was so going to bust your balls over voting No too. LOLOLOL
    Wise Ass!!! :0)

    - - - Updated - - -

    PS:
    I did that in WarZ section... To my own Poll...
    So, you weren't the first to do it bro.
    Last edited by DNC; 23-01-15 at 02:09 PM. Reason: Done with edits / updates. Cheers
    If you are talking to someone pretending to be me aka DNC, you're about to be scammed.
    Do not come to this forum complaining that you were scammed; when buying, selling, trading files is against forum rules.
    Don't point a finger at me, I am not talking with anyone.

  10. #25
    Custom title enabled ChewBecca is offline
    LegendRank
    Oct 2005 Join Date
    Low Wycombe, CLocation
    7,843Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    Quote Originally Posted by Biesmen View Post
    I voted no. I hate STO!

    JUST KIDDING! I'm a freaking Fleet Admiral on STO. I'm about to create a Klingon as well.
    I really want a Cryptic Section, but I voted no by accident. Please, forgive me!
    Removed one vote from no and added one to yes for you.







  11. #26
    MMO Supervisor Biesmen is offline
    SupervisorRank
    Apr 2007 Join Date
    2,127Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    Quote Originally Posted by MentaL View Post
    Looking promising although each individual game would have its own section, permitting what is available to the end user, so... to speed this process up list each individual title and what is currently available for it and the progression and i can evaluate it all a bit quicker, who knows.. maybe a section could be made within a week.
    That is great news. I'm looking forward to it

    Quote Originally Posted by ChewBecca View Post
    Removed one vote from no and added one to yes for you.
    You're the best! Thank you very much
    Forum Rules | Account Support | Subscribe
    RaGEZONE Facebook

    "The reason why people give up so fast is because they tend to look at how far they still have to go, instead of how far they have gotten."

  12. #27
    ☺☺Just Ask The Pope☺☺ PopeJohnPaul is offline
    SubscriberRank
    Jul 2009 Join Date
    Ottawa CALocation
    528Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    ohh progression now this is looking better

    i thought more ppl were gonna vote no
    was gonna hunt them all down and beat the *** outta them

    anyways 42 yes 3 no <--- lol Nuff Be Said...

  13. #28
    Alpha Member Cyndaquil is offline
    Alpha MaleRank
    Mar 2012 Join Date
    EnglandLocation
    2,283Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    @Locomoto
    @MuP
    @Viserion


    Why'd you vote no? - If any reason at all, i'm sure an argument (discussion) for no would be appreciated just so there is no mistakes.

  14. #29
    ☺☺Just Ask The Pope☺☺ PopeJohnPaul is offline
    SubscriberRank
    Jul 2009 Join Date
    Ottawa CALocation
    528Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    my guess is ppl vote no cos they wanna ruin it for the rest of us ?

    but we are 1 we are strong we will succeed ^^

  15. #30
    Developer DNC is offline
    DeveloperRank
    Oct 2011 Join Date
    2,438Posts

    Re: [REQUEST] Cryptic Section

    Alright I downloaded the NWO data archive, examined the contents and NO it is in no shape to get in game.

    Foundry: You cannot create a foundry quest, again will not save said such contents (even if you could create one, it requires having proper data files)
    Character select / Server select: Whoopee you can get that far... nothing else.

    Waste of time downloading. Was going to fix Only the Alpha version. But hell no, not in that state.

    Good luck to anyone wasting their time trying, but you wont succeed.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Just going to add, may as well just call this Poll (Vote for STO)
    If you are talking to someone pretending to be me aka DNC, you're about to be scammed.
    Do not come to this forum complaining that you were scammed; when buying, selling, trading files is against forum rules.
    Don't point a finger at me, I am not talking with anyone.




Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Advertisement