[Hint] How to fix Daisy

Well as it's tutorial section tell where I should change to what u wrote...

It ain't spoonfeed section. There's no "Hint" section, so I think the Tutorial section is close enough. As said, you should be able to piece this together with a small bit of ASM knowledge or some time spent googling. Daisy isn't too hard to debug considering it has C7 debug info inside.
 
Assembly mnemonics converted to hexadecimals, practically the way shellcode works..

Something like this I would like to see in these releases. That way you wont be spoon feeding so much that people can copy paste, but people actually have to look on the internet how it works, and with a little bit of study, have use of the code.

/moved to the release section, as it is more of a release than a tutorial.
 
Why You release this.
If You don't want to give anything to all.

Are you know FORTRAN or COBAL

Someone know something, not all.

If you really want to teach,do not skimp.


- Send Hex code to hex edit and use disassembler software to see the code.
This is machine code it a lowest programming language.

837E0C00 cmp dword [esi+0xc],byte +0x0
0F8426B3FBFF jz dword 0xfffbb330
FF760C push dword [esi+0xc]
FF1550C24B00 call dword near [dword 0x4bc250]
0F8448B3FBFF jz dword 0xfffbb361
C7460C00000000 mov dword [esi+0xc],0x0
E90BB3FBFF jmp dword 0xfffbb330

- Last you can decided to use or ignore it for your knowledge.




Originally Posted by Improved

Something like this I would like to see in these releases. That way you wont be spoon feeding so much that people can copy paste, but people actually have to look on the internet how it works, and with a little bit of study, have use of the code.

- spoonfeed no no.

- for v16-map-system in release section only 1 page.
I use 20 hour to resolve vs2003 error.
but if that error occur again. I will solve it in 5 minutes.

because I am a newbie.

I learn it by read all newbie thread.

IF someone ask AND someone answer THEN someone get knowledge.

Ragezone is for expert only. or for general level people.

I lea
 
Last edited:
Lol ^
His goal isn't to teach. His goal is too help people out without telling them everything. It's so people will get the initiative to actually learn a little about it.
 
Why You release this.
If You don't want to give anything to all.

Are you know FORTRAN or COBAL

Someone know something, not all.

If you really want to teach,do not skimp.


- Send Hex code to hex edit and use disassembler software to see the code.
This is machine code it a lowest programming language.

837E0C00 cmp dword [esi+0xc],byte +0x0
0F8426B3FBFF jz dword 0xfffbb330
FF760C push dword [esi+0xc]
FF1550C24B00 call dword near [dword 0x4bc250]
0F8448B3FBFF jz dword 0xfffbb361
C7460C00000000 mov dword [esi+0xc],0x0
E90BB3FBFF jmp dword 0xfffbb330

- Last you can decided to use or ignore it for your knowledge.




Originally Posted by Improved

Something like this I would like to see in these releases. That way you wont be spoon feeding so much that people can copy paste, but people actually have to look on the internet how it works, and with a little bit of study, have use of the code.

- spoonfeed no no.

- for v16-map-system in release section only 1 page.
I use 20 hour to resolve vs2003 error.
but if that error occur again. I will solve it in 5 minutes.

because I am a newbie.

I learn it by read all newbie thread.

IF someone ask AND someone answer THEN someone get knowledge.

Ragezone is for expert only. or for general level people.

I lea

No, I do not program in FORTRAN, I rather not go back to punch cards, but I am sure that I could understand it.

COBOL* is very easy.

All the programming languages have the same terminology in common, and after getting to know some of them, you can understand about 90% of em.
 
I agree to the hint because if he just gave a tutorial the reader never gains anything. But my doing research they gain more knowledge. Like they say games never get you anywhere. For me its a motivation to learn programming
 
look I'm just saying that I don't program in ASM, disassemble programs, reverse engineer or use hex other than reading packets and whatnot. I don't intend on learning the language either. But if I wanted to start learning it, it would be nice to say put this here and see what happens. I'm not looking for the Apple of Eden or anything.

So perhaps a little less vague that people other than 6 people on this section could better understand it.

I get what you are trying to do, I really do but it comes off as condescending a little bit. People look at this, and leave because they have no clue as to what they are reading. Those 6 or so people do and whilst I'm sure they are getting many laughs out of this, I don't see a point in putting this up. Not flaming, not ragging, or anything like that, but if you want to give hints: A.) a little less vague and 2.) More than one hint would suffice.

OH and for the record to this person who said this is Machine Code. You are very wrong.

Machine code is Binary and its the lowest form of coding out there. Ones and Zeros, Ons and Offs.

Asm is what you were trying to say there. Any basic programmer can knows this or should know it.

So it would honestly go like this:

Machine(Binary)
ASM
C
C++
.NET

the first on the list being the lowest and the last being the topmost. Now I know I didn't include programs like Pascal, Fortran, Cobolt, etc. but you get the idea. They are mainly around the C level anyway.
 
So perhaps a little less vague that people other than 6 people on this section could better understand it.

He chose to only help the people who understand. Would you rather no hint at all?

Also, it's quite ignorant to "ignore" ASM considering it would help you understand how to improve your C++ and C# coding practices. It also has incredibly simple syntax, which is why it's lower level coding than most languages.

"popups" is not the right definition, it's rather windows. All windows in FlyFF can be managed with daisy.

This is not entirely correct. Try managing WndWorld in daisy. However, it can edit most windows that use Flyff's "CWnd" implementation.
 
Back