Welcome!

Join our community of MMO enthusiasts and game developers! By registering, you'll gain access to discussions on the latest developments in MMO server files and collaborate with like-minded individuals. Join us today and unlock the potential of MMO server development!

Join Today!

Pack.bin unpacker 4.0.2 by Acteros

Junior Spellweaver
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
132
Reaction score
25
We got a source code for a pack.bin unpacker however we are still trying to make it work no luck so far.
Credit:

the file:

ps: before running the exe you need to change the pack name to ppack.bin the problem seems to happen when stage 2 starts it stops halfway and closes.
 
Experienced Elementalist
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
247
Reaction score
373
Acteros is Architect.
Never trust unknown sources.
It is a very old version of architects unpacker.
Сорок is too scared to release the full, half-working, pack.bin unpacker that he has though.

Good thing that I am not in the allods community anymore. Too much poop going on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Junior Spellweaver
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
132
Reaction score
25
Acteros is Architect.
Never trust unknown sources.
It is a very old version of architects unpacker.
Сорок is too scared to release the full, half-working, pack.bin unpacker that he has though.

Good thing that I am not in the allods community anymore. Too much poop going on.

So much drama and nothing coming out of it smh...

Always appreciated your opinion cause you ALWAYS come in with facts no shenanigans unlike a bunch of people here and definitely don't trust unknown sources, but at this point this community has been so dry for years in here compared to the old days any chance to keep it going i'm taking it.

Couldn't give 2 shits about the unpacker to be frank i'm not interested in opening a server or making money i respect those who do but i'm not about that, just want this community to be alive again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Experienced Elementalist
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
235
Reaction score
124
There is such a theory: if you rewrite the source code in a new C ++ project.Using the existing code of the architect - there is a chance that the program will work more steadily.Since when writing one version of the visual studio and a certain version of the boost was used!We are collecting this project in a visual studio of a different version and with a different version of the boost ...
Sorry for the confused sentence, but I think the thought you caught.
 
Junior Spellweaver
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
132
Reaction score
25
There is such a theory: if you rewrite the source code in a new C ++ project.Using the existing code of the architect - there is a chance that the program will work more steadily.Since when writing one version of the visual studio and a certain version of the boost was used!We are collecting this project in a visual studio of a different version and with a different version of the boost ...
Sorry for the confused sentence, but I think the thought you caught.

Any luck on that ? I tried with vs2015 didn't work(although not 100% sure)
 
Experienced Elementalist
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
235
Reaction score
124
Any luck on that ? I tried with vs2015 didn't work(although not 100% sure)
According to the architect, this source code is written at 80%.And logically can not be considered a worker.Ddenisk's comment on this source code was that only 20% of its working state is actually written.from this it follows that he (the source code) also can not be considered a worker.The architect immediately said that the code is not ready for the final assembly of the instrument.And he proposed jointly to complete this project.
=============ru_translate=============

Со слов архитектора, данный исходный код написан на 80%.И по логике не может считаться рабочим.Комментарий ддениски к данному исходному коду гласил о том что на самом деле написано всего 20% от своего рабочего состояния.из этого следует что он (исходный код) так же не может считаться рабочим.Архитектор сразу сказал что код не готов для окончательной сборки инструмента.И предложил совместно завершить этот проект.
 
Junior Spellweaver
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
132
Reaction score
25
According to the architect, this source code is written at 80%.And logically can not be considered a worker.Ddenisk's comment on this source code was that only 20% of its working state is actually written.from this it follows that he (the source code) also can not be considered a worker.The architect immediately said that the code is not ready for the final assembly of the instrument.And he proposed jointly to complete this project.

so rip trying to get this to work
 
Last edited:
Initiate Mage
Joined
Aug 4, 2018
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
Even the architect did not use this unpacker and reworked it from scratch; there is little point in it.
=============ru_translate=============
Даже архитектор этим распаковщиком не пользовался и переделывал с нуля, смысла от него мало.
 
Back
Top