exploit code

[pher14344]

i managed to disabled "%" ingame and all the special character's alt + numpad
is there any exploit code except "%"? just comment here thank you

 

[metan0ia]

how did you managed to disable it sir.. tnx

 

[A v a r a]

i managed to disabled "%" ingame and all the special character's alt + numpad
is there any exploit code except "%"? just comment here thank you

Wow that's good news.

Could you be so kind to share how to disable the "%" and ALT + Numpad please?

Ciao!

 

[master_unknown]

Why would he share his hard work to you?
Disabling those codes takes time & efforts.
Specially if you're new to debugging.

 

[A v a r a]

I don't know either. If you have the answer you can answer it or maybe he is generous enough and you are not :fanny:

 

[Kallyanna]

Why would he share his hard work to you?
Disabling those codes takes time & efforts.
Specially if you're new to debugging.

This is a Development section, and no he doesnt have to show his work to anyone, this is just something he is working on, and very hard I imagine. If I was him ... I would oupen the engine in IDA pro n take a look at the states

 

[Jangan]

Why would he share his hard work to you?
Disabling those codes takes time & efforts.
Specially if you're new to debugging.

Because ragezone is a community built for sharing... Just like how someone released those tantra files you are using, you are kind of expected to contribute back to the community.

Else, you are classified as a useless leecher with no value to ragezone what-so-ever.Not saying that the 26 posts guy deserves the information, technically he doesn't since he is classified as a useless leech, but the idea of contribution should be used by everyone.

~ Jangan

 

[Shichibukai]

They don't want to share something for the community its because of the money involved. Competition sucks! and that's why tantra section is already dying and didn't evolved to any something new.

 

[Kallyanna]

They don't want to share something for the community its because of the money involved. Competition sucks! and that's why tantra section is already dying and didn't evolved to any something new.

Unfortunatly this is the same all over the forum, not just in the Tantra Online Section.... and TRUST me the KalOnline section is worse.
If people work together then .. well things might start looking up everywhere

 

[Shichibukai]

Unfortunatly this is the same all over the forum, not just in the Tantra Online Section.... and TRUST me the KalOnline section is worse.
If people work together then .. well things might start looking up everywhere

Right, well we can't please everyone. And also the game will eventually die soon.
Haven't seen someone posted a working source for this game.

 

[master_unknown]

There's no working source for this game.
Hanbitsoft stopped the development years ago.

 

[jbeitz107]

The biggest problem that I can see is that it is all about money. If you don't have another server attacking and asking for money then there is a player that is doing the same. Unfortunately it is selfish of them. For this game to continue it means that players, servers and others need to work to allow the game to continue. People have to remember that hosting is not free and this means that all should NOT attempt to make it so that others cannot play the game.

 

[Terrified]

Why would a server being attacked? good work = envy. envious persons tend to distract what good at others who didn't share what they have. lol, survival cycle. sad but true. money is just a second option. we can post development here, but if we are going to share something, it should have placed in the released section right? now as far as tantra is concern, it is not dying, it was just discontinued long time ago. and now that we gather pieces of the development tools, it does slowly patched all together. if we could help each other recreate it, built it and develop it, it will come out better than the original developer. but instead, everytime somebody is trying to post his development, everyone consider that as competition and there goes a battle between destroying one's accomplishment.

anyway, those codes are patched already... hope that several developers can do the same. ^_^ thanks pher14344 for the motivation.

 

[A v a r a]

Crab mentality there is but somehow I hope whatever exploitation in the game that is present upto now I really encourage every to share it so we can work on it. Everyday is just another learning day for us all. Maybe one day we could join together as a team in one server sharing the same passion of the game.

 

[Lunatic]

I already disable those specials chars in my HTlauncher by using Hex Editor .

 

[A v a r a]

I already disable those specials chars in my HTlauncher by using Hex Editor .

Your further elaboration regarding that matter is deeply appreciated. As to how and how really...

 

[Lunatic]

just message me if you are interested

 

[dTantra]

Client side blocking is a very crappy way to do it, instead why not filter packets like the big servers do??

struct MSG_STANDARD
{
WORD wType;
WORD wSeq;
WORD wPDULength;
WORD wDummy;
DWORD dwClientTick;
int nID;
};

bool ValidString(char * cString){
	string lFilter = "!@#$^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,./<>?`~ ";
	int iResult = 1;
	int i, j;
	bool Continue = false;
	const char * cFilter = "!@#$^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,./<>?`~ ";


	string sString = string(cString);


	if(sString.size() == 0)
	{
		return true;
	}


	for ( i = 0; i <= sString.size() - 1 && iResult == 1; i++)
	{
		if(cString[i] < 0)
		{
			return false;
		}
		else if(!isalnum(cString[i]))
		{
			Continue = true;
			for( j = 0; j <= lFilter.size() - 1 && Continue == true; j++)
			{
				Continue = true;
				iResult = 0;
				if(cFilter[j] == cString[i])
				{
					iResult = 1;
					Continue = false;
					break;
				}
			}
		}
	}


	if(iResult == 1)
	{
		return true;
	}
	else
	{
		return false;
	}
};


bool ValidName(char * cName, int cSize)
{
	int cResult = 0;
	for (int i = 0; i <= cSize - 1; i++)
	{
		if(cName[i] < 0)
		{
			return false;
		}
		else if(!isalnum(cName[i]))
		{
			return false;
		}
	}
	return true;
}

 

[Lunatic]

Client side blocking is a very crappy way to do it, instead why not filter packets like the big servers do??

struct MSG_STANDARD
{
WORD wType;
WORD wSeq;
WORD wPDULength;
WORD wDummy;
DWORD dwClientTick;
int nID;
};

bool ValidString(char * cString){
    string lFilter = "!@#$^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,./<>?`~ ";
    int iResult = 1;
    int i, j;
    bool Continue = false;
    const char * cFilter = "!@#$^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,./<>?`~ ";


    string sString = string(cString);


    if(sString.size() == 0)
    {
        return true;
    }


    for ( i = 0; i <= sString.size() - 1 && iResult == 1; i++)
    {
        if(cString[i] < 0)
        {
            return false;
        }
        else if(!isalnum(cString[i]))
        {
            Continue = true;
            for( j = 0; j <= lFilter.size() - 1 && Continue == true; j++)
            {
                Continue = true;
                iResult = 0;
                if(cFilter[j] == cString[i])
                {
                    iResult = 1;
                    Continue = false;
                    break;
                }
            }
        }
    }


    if(iResult == 1)
    {
        return true;
    }
    else
    {
        return false;
    }
};


bool ValidName(char * cName, int cSize)
{
    int cResult = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i <= cSize - 1; i++)
    {
        if(cName[i] < 0)
        {
            return false;
        }
        else if(!isalnum(cName[i]))
        {
            return false;
        }
    }
    return true;
}

yes we can .
but we have a different kind of idea's on how to disable those characters in .exe
one of them is using offset .
don't worry i will post some tutorials how to disable it.

 

[A v a r a]

yes we can .
but we have a different kind of idea's on how to disable those characters in .exe
one of them is using offset .
don't worry i will post some tutorials how to disable it.

I can't wait for your tutorial mate.