Recent content by shoftee

Why, weren't you going to? Instead of sitting around waiting for something to happen, why don't you start off? Here I thought my last post made this sentiment clear enough...

Efficiency is relative. If your code works as fast as you need it to, optimising for speed is pointless. Also, always base speed optimisations on metrics, not on random feelings. No. Don't use either of them. Make simple classes/structs for each usage you need instead. That way you can have...

I might. Moreover... will you be doing so? I expected you to get right to it, seeing as you started posting your changes here instead of in a properly versioned system. What's stopping you?

You want a fork? You must be registered for see element. There. You got your fork. Work away.

Rakeda, do you plan to continue your work on github or just wanted to post the current version somewhere? I can probably provide you with comments if you keep working on github. If you want.

I appreciate your effort, Fraysa, however... When I look at this code, I'm starting to understand why this place is called RageZone. Get it up on github, then we can talk~

One good reason to not use Single there would be that Single blows up when an element is not found, or when more than one element is found, while the method he wrote returns the first found (irrelevant of other matches) and returns default(T) if there is no match. Although you are correct in...

And that would work beautifully, if you had control over the parallelism with MINA. But you don't. In all the networking frameworks I've seen, what you get to do is you get to attach a custom handler to the inbound and outbound sinks - like overriding a method - and in that handler you do the...

F4keName, let's try this out. We have the following sequence: 1. Thread A starts processing packet 1. 2. Thread B starts processing packet 2. 3. Thread A enters synchronized crypto block, transforms with IV version 1, and shuffles the IV to version 2. 4. Thread B then enters synchronized...

You didn't know what the code did and you integrated it anyways? ... why? I can't tell you exactly what the effects are since I don't know what your code was before you changed it. In general, try-with-resources "ensures" that the object you pass into it (in this case the PreparedStatement and...

There are two try-with-resources blocks because both PreparedStatement and ResultSet are nasty database objects which need to be closed safely.

If you're gonna do it with try-with-resources, then you might as well remove the .close() calls, since that's what try-with-resources is for anyways... The outer try-catch block can be merged with the try-with-resources block right after it. ... and moreover, if you're gonna do...

If execution asynchrony and parallelism are not your strong points, there is no way you could make your packet handling anywhere near server-level performant without BOTH of them, so that's also something to keep in mind. If you like, I'm sure there are a few good networking libraries out there...