har har..Quote:
Originally Posted by polluxval
Printable View
har har..Quote:
Originally Posted by polluxval
Quote:
Originally Posted by polluxval
U are the devil AHAHAHAHAh Run away :)
Right now I hope we all die lol.
This is a great day to honor Iron Maiden
http://eil.com/newgallery/Iron-Maide...-Of-285752.jpg
:music_ban
By the way... The devil is my bitch hu hu :hippi:
Thanks for the tribute. :P I think that it's the Apocolypse.:burn:Quote:
Originally Posted by Hikaru_K
Well...just wait and see what happend :P
06/05/06 << my b day :)
superstition ftw.
Mercy me. Dinosaur Fossils? Evolution? If the world had been around for a mere 6000 years, you would of seen Monkey's literally change into men in their own life times. Animals would of gained much more in the way of a language. Basically if we changed from 1 cell bacteria to what is one (not the) the most advanced mammals on the planet. My jesus, if you wanted to reach something, you would actually evolve there and then to be taller.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hikaru_K
Your the one sent to kill us LOL! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by polluxval
Im pretty sure we will all burn in flames!
Not on 06/06/06 but sooner or later ;)
06/06/06 will be the first day in the summer camp for me :P Maybe I'll get kiled there lol !
good luck thereQuote:
Originally Posted by Agilius
You and about 16,400,000 (give or take a couple thousand) other ppl. 8-pQuote:
Originally Posted by polluxval
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMonkey
Read carefully: Dinosaur, Fossil and the things like that, are for real, but the way ther are explained is totally wrong:
#
Coral reefs need millions of years to grow. [Actually, what was thought to be ‘coral reef’ turns out to be thick carbonate platforms, most probably deposited during the Flood. The reef is only a very thin layer on top. In other cases, the ‘reef’ did not grow in place from coral but was transported there by water.]
#
Chalk deposits need millions of years to accumulate. [Chalk accumulation is not steady state but highly episodic. Under cataclysmic Flood conditions, explosive blooms of tiny organisms like coccolithophores could produce the chalk beds in a short space of time.]
#
Granites need millions of years to cool. [Not when the cooling effects of circulating water are allowed for.]
#
Metamorphic rocks need million of years to form. [Metamorphic reactions happen quickly when there is plenty of water, just as the Flood would provide.]
#
Sediment kilometres thick covering metamorphic rocks took millions of years to erode. [Only at the erosion rates observed today. There is no problem eroding kilometres of sediment quickly with large volumes of fast-moving water during the Flood.]
Not enough stone age skeletons
Evolutionary anthropologists say that the stone age lasted for at least 100,000 years, during which time the world population of Neanderthal and Cro-magnon men was roughly constant, between 1 and 10 million. All that time they were burying their dead with artefacts. By this scenario, they would have buried at least 4 billion bodies. If the evolutionary time scale is correct, buried bones should be able to last for much longer than 100,000 years, so many of the supposed 4 billion stone age skeletons should still be around (and certainly the buried artefacts). Yet only a few thousand have been found. This implies that the stone age was much shorter than evolutionists think, a few hundred years in many areas.
Dinossaur Related:
Most people think that fossil bones (of which the most well-known examples are those of dinosaurs) must be very, very old—because, after all, they have turned to stone, haven’t they?
Even millions of years might, to some, not even seem long enough to allow for natural processes to gradually, molecule by molecule, replace the original substance of the bone with rock minerals.
But this common picture is misleading. A recent book, co-authored by a world expert on dinosaurs, points out some things about dinosaur bones that are of great interest to creationists.1
For one thing, it says:
‘Bones do not have to be “turned into stone” to be fossils, and usually most of the original bone is still present in a dinosaur fossil.’
Ok, but even if the actual bone is not replaced by rock minerals, some fossil dinosaur bones are rock-hard, and show under the microscope when cut that they have been thoroughly ‘permineralized.’ This means that rock minerals have been deposited into all the spaces within the original bone. Doesn’t this show that the formation of these fossils, at least, must represent a long time? Think again. The same authoritative work also tells us:
‘The amount of time that it takes for a bone to become completely permineralized is highly variable. If the groundwater is heavily laden with minerals in solution, the process can happen rapidly. Modern bones that fall into mineral springs can become permineralized within a matter of weeks.’
So even a rock-solid, hard shiny fossil dinosaur bone, showing under the microscope that all available spaces have been totally filled with rock minerals, does not indicate that it necessarily took millions of years to form at all.
Now of course if a dinosaur bone is indeed permineralized, it would give it great protection from the normal processes which cause things such as bone to just naturally ‘fall apart.’ So a permineralized bone might indeed be anything from a few weeks to millions of years old.
However, in a situation where the dinosaur bone has been prevented from being invaded by mineral-rich water, one would expect that over millions of years, even locked away from all bacterial agents, dinosaur bone would, in obeying the laws of thermodynamics, just disintegrate from the random motions of the molecules therein.
Man- Ape related:
Scientific implications
Scientifically, the concept of apemen implies the following.
1. That evolution is true and that it produced a line of semi-human creatures from some original non-human ancestor.
2. That the process which ultimately produced man was death of the less fit along the way.
3. That the millions of years necessary for this process did occur.
4. That the fossils claimed to be relics of such creatures constitute a reliable record, i.e. have been interpreted correctly in anatomy, age, and presumed evolutionary relationships.
What is the evidence?
There are many differences between humans and apes that can be seen in fossil remains. These include the fact that humans walk erect and so have appropriate/distinctive knee and hip joints, backbone, toes, etc. Humans also have an opposable thumb, make and use sophisticated tools as well as fire, and engage in diverse creativity. They have a larger brain capacity than apes, smaller teeth set in parabolic or V-shaped, rather than U-shaped, jaws, and they sometimes write, paint or make and play musical instruments.
Communication by language is another crucial difference, as is the ability to do mathematics. Other differences include the exercise of reason and free-will, rather than just instinct. However, evidence of these capabilities is not usually observable from fossil fragments.
The Fully research of this last fact about human-apes can be found Here
Enjoy it! :hippi:
the number is 616 not 661Quote:
Originally Posted by pietertje
lol...thats gonna be awsome...i think im gonna wait till my next pay check comes in and get that for my server ^^ ....lol your all out of yah minds!.....im gonna seek blood on that day muahha! :vamplaserQuote:
Originally Posted by NoPeace
06/06/06 = The day when all the noobs die lol!
I hope not =/Quote:
Originally Posted by Dios
Haha, you wish! xD (I WISH! lol)Quote:
Originally Posted by blade310
another evidence about the world that its much much older then 6000 years... :
Oil (the one that can be found under ground) or how some call it "Black Gold" is being created by creatures who lived here millions over millions years ago and after they die million after million they become into Oil this procces takes millions of years...
and the 2006 year count, its only the count from jesus birth... (maybe death not sure)...
Yet it took Millions of years ago and Dinosaurs lived 65million years ago?? O_oQuote:
Originally Posted by Hikaru_K
The world has been arround for 200 Millenia :D
I know I am that old :D
I am GOD
Dude, did you pay attention to Hikaru_K? Hikaru_K has the most recent research and studies from the field posted for you kiddies with the 'kindergarten' ideal.Quote:
Originally Posted by KongoIL
It has been proven, under specific conditions, which have indefinetelly been administered, that in "specific conditions" that a artifact, oil for example, can be dated by our current technology, inaccrurately, and give off a reading of a much older object.
Our technology, until recently, had no room for variables, as well as the narrow minds of more primitive days, to compensate for such factors as weather conditions. Trees, for one, can appear millions of years old, when in fact, they are merely a couple hundred years old. This has been proven.
The Jews dated the world to about about 5000-6000 years old, which was once laughed at, but now thought to be more accurate.
Personally, I don't know what to believe, I will wait out a little longer until some more facts come a long.
Anyway, 666 is not the mark of the beast, it is the mark of Ceasar or Nero. As for 616, I said that a long time ago, and I remember stating that I couldn't remember if that was accurate or not. A talk show host was throwing it out, and it could have been a mere objection, a statement of a possibility in which it could be. However, it is a silly christian superstition, and we all know what has becomes of all that crap.
Spontaneous Human Combustion ftw! :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Dios
Isnt that day something to do with a slayer album or something?
No, it's a myth that supposedly you produce so much stomach acid that you literally burn holes through your stomach and skin, then eventually burst into flame. Sounds cool but it has never been proven. :P