200 MPG car? - goverment cover up?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 42 of 42
  1. #26
    Grand Master xeLJoYo is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Nov 2004 Join Date
    01001110 011001Location
    1,421Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NoPeace
    ion is being developed. The Chinese has it nearly completed. By 2008 the first one should be done. Seeing the Chinese are doing it you know that countries like the US and UK are already in production on it also and will probally come out with it sooner.
    Was about damned time they went to figure out fusion. They've been messing around with it ever since the first atomic bomb.

  2. #27
    Browncoat Robert is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Mar 2003 Join Date
    UKLocation
    8,658Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NoPeace
    You do realise how much a light car slips and slids on wet and icy roads? A lightweight plastic car wouldn't stay on it. First icy curve and you're off the road.

    Also the accelleration would suck. You need weight to force your car on the ground so your tires don't spin. ;)
    Id still like to see it happen, with an electronic motor which accelerates slow anyway it would work well. Also the fact that electric motors run out quite fast would be extended by the lighter weight aswell. However for long journeys electric cars suck, so itd be more of a japan/uk/other small countrys thing and the US will probly use a hybrid for longer stuff.

    Quote Originally Posted by NoPeace
    I coubt that very much. For much added energy it would be idle to use Nuclear energy. They produce far much more power then conventional methods for a slightly more start up cost. In the long run they pay for themselves since they do not require a constant supply of fossile fuels.

    Futhermore fusion is being developed. The Chinese has it nearly completed. By 2008 the first one should be done. Seeing the Chinese are doing it you know that countries like the US and UK are already in production on it also and will probally come out with it sooner.

    NoPeace - out
    Nuclear is good, but their are better things:
    Quote Originally Posted by http://www.discover.com/issues/feb-06/features/energizer/
    Germany and Spain each install over 2,000 megawatts of wind power every year. That figure exceeds the average global net addition of nuclear power every year in this decade. Denmark is now one-fifth wind powered; Germany, about a tenth.
    Too bad the UK cant really do that with our lack of space, but in america it should be massive >_<

  3. #28
    Elite Member zerog is offline
    Member +Rank
    Sep 2004 Join Date
    New YorkLocation
    165Posts
    teh fact is, the goverment lies!, and soemtimes it makes mistakes when lieing, like with 9/11 they say the 2000 degree heat caouse the towers to colapse (even though it never happaned before) but people were holding on to the 2000 degree molten stell screaming for help, i guess they didnt realise that it was that hot : \

    also, crash site - plane = not a plane crash, explosion maybie. just like what was in pensilvania

    same thing with the pentagon crash site - plane = plane crash into pentagon (acording to the goverment) (also they got some crapy protection that they couldnt stop a plane with any misiles that first circled around just to hit the newly renovated part made just to withstand bombs and planes)
    but lets say the pentagon story was true and the reason there were no plane parts is becouse it desinagrated (acording to the 9/11 commition) and the people working on hte scine recovered the human remains (also acording to the 9/11 commition report), then wouldnt the people also disinagreate if teh heat was so hot to that to steel

  4. #29
    Browncoat Robert is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Mar 2003 Join Date
    UKLocation
    8,658Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zerog
    teh fact is, the goverment lies!, and soemtimes it makes mistakes when lieing, like with 9/11 they say the 2000 degree heat caouse the towers to colapse (even though it never happaned before) but people were holding on to the 2000 degree molten stell screaming for help, i guess they didnt realise that it was that hot : \

    also, crash site - plane = not a plane crash, explosion maybie. just like what was in pensilvania

    same thing with the pentagon crash site - plane = plane crash into pentagon (acording to the goverment) (also they got some crapy protection that they couldnt stop a plane with any misiles that first circled around just to hit the newly renovated part made just to withstand bombs and planes)
    but lets say the pentagon story was true and the reason there were no plane parts is becouse it desinagrated (acording to the 9/11 commition) and the people working on hte scine recovered the human remains (also acording to the 9/11 commition report), then wouldnt the people also disinagreate if teh heat was so hot to that to steel
    They do it to stop people from panicing. If people knew they were on aircrafts that could easily be taken control of by a computer no one would fly. Likewise if the economy of america broke down because no one used oil anymore there would be wide spread panic.

  5. #30
    /\/\@573|2 NoPeace is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Feb 2004 Join Date
    under your bedLocation
    15,474Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by xeLJoYo
    Was about damned time they went to figure out fusion. They've been messing around with it ever since the first atomic bomb.
    Fusion is much harder to do then nuclear. All nuclear is taking unstable atoms and breaking them up. Simple since it occuars naturally. But when you think of it nuclear is limited to just a few rare elements. They have yet to develope a way to run nuclear power with any material.

    Fusion on the other hand doesn't involve breaking it up but smashing them together to for a new atom. Which only occurs natuarally in stars.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert
    Id still like to see it happen, with an electronic motor which accelerates slow anyway it would work well. Also the fact that electric motors run out quite fast would be extended by the lighter weight aswell. However for long journeys electric cars suck, so itd be more of a japan/uk/other small countrys thing and the US will probly use a hybrid for longer stuff.
    Actually a water powered fuel cell would be great for long rages to power a car. Too bad that technology is highly unwanted.

    Nuclear is good, but their are better things:
    Until fusion comes around nuclear is the best there is. Reasons why? It's clean. The only thing that comes out of thoes massive cheminies is steam. There is small amount of nuclear waist that needs to be dealt with thought but no where near as much waist as other methods produce.

    Too bad the UK cant really do that with our lack of space, but in america it should be massive >_<
    Do you realize how much energy the US waists? About 70-80% of the total worlds nuclear power is made in the states. But that only covers about 10-15% of its actually power drain.

    Sure it can be done in small contries in europe where they have less power drain the major US cities but the US as a whole couldn't sustain from it.

    NoPeace - out

  6. #31
    F**KIN LEGEND! exclamatio is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Jan 2003 Join Date
    Merry EnglandLocation
    22,146Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Smo
    The ozone would be under more threat than before. Just means fossil fuels would last longer - meaning the amount of pollution increases more than 10 fold. Cars still create waste, this invention just means petrol prices would plummet.

    Edit: Robert, how would a car made of plastic be safer than a car made of steel?

    if they were getting much further to the gallon that means they are burning the fossil fuels much slower which in turn slows down pollution

  7. #32
    Kill The_Gatekeeper_ is offline
    LegendRank
    May 2004 Join Date
    The SouthLocation
    6,059Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DaCheat
    yeah if all cars were 200mpg, the oil comps. would jack the price of gas to $100 a gallen...
    quoted for the 100% truth. just because you get good gas milage doesn't mean gas will be cheaper, it just means they can jack the gas up to still make you pay about the same price for less gas.

  8. #33
    Grand Master theRAGE is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Oct 2004 Join Date
    OntarioLocation
    1,178Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Gatekeeper_
    quoted for the 100% truth. just because you get good gas milage doesn't mean gas will be cheaper, it just means they can jack the gas up to still make you pay about the same price for less gas.
    It'd take the exact same amount of effort to make the gas, so why would the oil companies have the right to do so? I think if they did, they'd be asking for their own boycott - people would try to make a car that doesn't run on gas but still has the same 200MPG ability.

  9. #34
    F**KIN LEGEND! exclamatio is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Jan 2003 Join Date
    Merry EnglandLocation
    22,146Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by theRAGE
    It'd take the exact same amount of effort to make the gas, so why would the oil companies have the right to do so? I think if they did, they'd be asking for their own boycott - people would try to make a car that doesn't run on gas but still has the same 200MPG ability.
    cars like that have existed for way longer than you or i have been alive

    did u know that cars that can run on hemp had been invented and that it is much much cleaner than the fuel we use atm and easily renuable unlike fossile fuel

    however because it is so easily renewable anyone can grow it and ue it for fuel

    if anyone can grow it then it cant be sold to you for such crazy prices

  10. #35
    Grand Master theRAGE is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Oct 2004 Join Date
    OntarioLocation
    1,178Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Exclamatio
    cars like that have existed for way longer than you or i have been alive

    did u know that cars that can run on hemp had been invented and that it is much much cleaner than the fuel we use atm and easily renuable unlike fossile fuel

    however because it is so easily renewable anyone can grow it and ue it for fuel

    if anyone can grow it then it cant be sold to you for such crazy prices
    Exactly... so if oil companies wanted to raise their prices, they'd be giving themselves a death sentence.

  11. #36
    F**KIN LEGEND! exclamatio is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Jan 2003 Join Date
    Merry EnglandLocation
    22,146Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by theRAGE
    Exactly... so if oil companies wanted to raise their prices, they'd be giving themselves a death sentence.

    not exactly at all


    these cars have been invented but do u see them everywhere?

    why dont u drive a car now that would not only cost a fraction of the regular cost to build and maintaine but is also eco friendly?

    because the governments and people in power wont let you

  12. #37
    Qliphoth fuckstick is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Mar 2004 Join Date
    The Tenth Sub Level of SuicideLocation
    681Posts
    Anyone ever hear about HO gas?
    Some guy in my state invented it as an alternative to gasoline...
    It basically involved modifying the engine a bit and making an H2O to HO converter.
    Heard about it a couple years ago, but never again since.
    Seems pretty sad, since 70% of our world is covered with water, 97.5% of it being salt water, and we're still going apeshit over fucking oil...

  13. #38
    Grand Master WYWH is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Mar 2004 Join Date
    EuropeLocation
    2,813Posts
    I think brazil said that by 2007 60% of the cars in it will run on corn based fuel.

  14. #39
    Browncoat Robert is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Mar 2003 Join Date
    UKLocation
    8,658Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by WYWH
    I think brazil said that by 2007 60% of the cars in it will run on corn based fuel.
    Let me guess, brazil produces corn based fuel? lol

    The problem with all these fuels, they dont seem to produce as much power as petrol does, so anyone who is into fast cars (most males :p) wont want them anyway, hense i think the way forward is lighter cars instead

  15. #40
    Grand Master locust is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Jun 2005 Join Date
    Neu MexikoLocation
    844Posts
    I've been saying this for years, and even posting this for years on THIS forum.. wow.. I want to dick slap every single one of you guys.

    Anyways, bigger companies patent the methods, as stated many, many times before, and so to use this technology it first has to be public, then the user has to be able to pay the royalties.

  16. #41
    Elite Member zerog is offline
    Member +Rank
    Sep 2004 Join Date
    New YorkLocation
    165Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by fuckstick
    Anyone ever hear about HO gas?
    Some guy in my state invented it as an alternative to gasoline...
    It basically involved modifying the engine a bit and making an H2O to HO converter.
    Heard about it a couple years ago, but never again since.
    Seems pretty sad, since 70% of our world is covered with water, 97.5% of it being salt water, and we're still going apeshit over fucking oil...
    thats what has happaned to evry singe person that tyed to make some thing that ehter triple the gas milage or an alternative fuel
    they are just never heard from again....

  17. #42
    Grand Master theRAGE is offline
    Grand MasterRank
    Oct 2004 Join Date
    OntarioLocation
    1,178Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by locust
    I've been saying this for years, and even posting this for years on THIS forum.. wow.. I want to dick slap every single one of you guys.
    Mmmm... locust penis.

    So yeah, fuck the government and oil companies... :>



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Advertisement