Was about damned time they went to figure out fusion. They've been messing around with it ever since the first atomic bomb.Originally Posted by NoPeace
Was about damned time they went to figure out fusion. They've been messing around with it ever since the first atomic bomb.Originally Posted by NoPeace
Id still like to see it happen, with an electronic motor which accelerates slow anyway it would work well. Also the fact that electric motors run out quite fast would be extended by the lighter weight aswell. However for long journeys electric cars suck, so itd be more of a japan/uk/other small countrys thing and the US will probly use a hybrid for longer stuff.Originally Posted by NoPeace
Nuclear is good, but their are better things:Originally Posted by NoPeace
Too bad the UK cant really do that with our lack of space, but in america it should be massive >_<Originally Posted by http://www.discover.com/issues/feb-06/features/energizer/
teh fact is, the goverment lies!, and soemtimes it makes mistakes when lieing, like with 9/11 they say the 2000 degree heat caouse the towers to colapse (even though it never happaned before) but people were holding on to the 2000 degree molten stell screaming for help, i guess they didnt realise that it was that hot : \
also, crash site - plane = not a plane crash, explosion maybie. just like what was in pensilvania
same thing with the pentagon crash site - plane = plane crash into pentagon (acording to the goverment) (also they got some crapy protection that they couldnt stop a plane with any misiles that first circled around just to hit the newly renovated part made just to withstand bombs and planes)
but lets say the pentagon story was true and the reason there were no plane parts is becouse it desinagrated (acording to the 9/11 commition) and the people working on hte scine recovered the human remains (also acording to the 9/11 commition report), then wouldnt the people also disinagreate if teh heat was so hot to that to steel
They do it to stop people from panicing. If people knew they were on aircrafts that could easily be taken control of by a computer no one would fly. Likewise if the economy of america broke down because no one used oil anymore there would be wide spread panic.Originally Posted by zerog
Fusion is much harder to do then nuclear. All nuclear is taking unstable atoms and breaking them up. Simple since it occuars naturally. But when you think of it nuclear is limited to just a few rare elements. They have yet to develope a way to run nuclear power with any material.Originally Posted by xeLJoYo
Fusion on the other hand doesn't involve breaking it up but smashing them together to for a new atom. Which only occurs natuarally in stars.
Actually a water powered fuel cell would be great for long rages to power a car. Too bad that technology is highly unwanted.Originally Posted by Robert
Until fusion comes around nuclear is the best there is. Reasons why? It's clean. The only thing that comes out of thoes massive cheminies is steam. There is small amount of nuclear waist that needs to be dealt with thought but no where near as much waist as other methods produce.Nuclear is good, but their are better things:
Do you realize how much energy the US waists? About 70-80% of the total worlds nuclear power is made in the states. But that only covers about 10-15% of its actually power drain.Too bad the UK cant really do that with our lack of space, but in america it should be massive >_<
Sure it can be done in small contries in europe where they have less power drain the major US cities but the US as a whole couldn't sustain from it.
NoPeace - out
Originally Posted by Smo
if they were getting much further to the gallon that means they are burning the fossil fuels much slower which in turn slows down pollution
quoted for the 100% truth. just because you get good gas milage doesn't mean gas will be cheaper, it just means they can jack the gas up to still make you pay about the same price for less gas.Originally Posted by DaCheat
It'd take the exact same amount of effort to make the gas, so why would the oil companies have the right to do so? I think if they did, they'd be asking for their own boycott - people would try to make a car that doesn't run on gas but still has the same 200MPG ability.Originally Posted by The_Gatekeeper_
cars like that have existed for way longer than you or i have been aliveOriginally Posted by theRAGE
did u know that cars that can run on hemp had been invented and that it is much much cleaner than the fuel we use atm and easily renuable unlike fossile fuel
however because it is so easily renewable anyone can grow it and ue it for fuel
if anyone can grow it then it cant be sold to you for such crazy prices
Exactly... so if oil companies wanted to raise their prices, they'd be giving themselves a death sentence.Originally Posted by Exclamatio
Originally Posted by theRAGE
not exactly at all
these cars have been invented but do u see them everywhere?
why dont u drive a car now that would not only cost a fraction of the regular cost to build and maintaine but is also eco friendly?
because the governments and people in power wont let you
Anyone ever hear about HO gas?
Some guy in my state invented it as an alternative to gasoline...
It basically involved modifying the engine a bit and making an H2O to HO converter.
Heard about it a couple years ago, but never again since.
Seems pretty sad, since 70% of our world is covered with water, 97.5% of it being salt water, and we're still going apeshit over fucking oil...
I think brazil said that by 2007 60% of the cars in it will run on corn based fuel.
Let me guess, brazil produces corn based fuel? lolOriginally Posted by WYWH
The problem with all these fuels, they dont seem to produce as much power as petrol does, so anyone who is into fast cars (most males :p) wont want them anyway, hense i think the way forward is lighter cars instead
I've been saying this for years, and even posting this for years on THIS forum.. wow.. I want to dick slap every single one of you guys.
Anyways, bigger companies patent the methods, as stated many, many times before, and so to use this technology it first has to be public, then the user has to be able to pay the royalties.
thats what has happaned to evry singe person that tyed to make some thing that ehter triple the gas milage or an alternative fuelOriginally Posted by fuckstick
they are just never heard from again....
Mmmm... locust penis.Originally Posted by locust
So yeah, fuck the government and oil companies... :>