Re: Age Of Conan Vs WarHammer
Well let's see..
AoC: Real time combat
WAR: Auto-Attacking
AoC: Superior Graphics
WAR: WOW 2.1 Graphics
AoC: No language barriers
WAR: Language barriers
AoC: Siege Combat
WAR: Wannabe siege combat
AoC: Fatalities
WAR: More auto-attacking
AoC: Brutal world
WAR: Carebear world
AoC: PvE/PvP
WAR: PvE/PvP (PvP in this game sucks, in my opinion)
AoC: Mounted combat
WAR: Even more auto-attacking
AoC: Active blocking system
WAR: Even more auto-attacking/blocking
AoC: Player cities
WAR: Don't have it.
AoC: Drunken brawling
WAR: Alot more auto-attacking
AoC: New advanced AI system
WAR: WOW 2.1 system
AoC > WAR in every aspect.
Warhammer is World of Warcraft, this is a known fact. They claim the Realm vs Realm thing to be new. It is nothing new, in fact it is the same thing as in WoW. The fight for Halaa in Nagrand, it is the same concept just on a slightly larger scale. Nothing new about it as they claim. Realm vs Realm means Horde vs Alliance in Warhammer. SAME DARN THING... KIDDY GRAPHICS and a CAREBEAR GAME.
Re: Age Of Conan Vs WarHammer
warhammer will atract the kiddies from WoW, and AoC the more mature gamers...
also, warhammer = lot's of instanced PvP... and all of you wow players out there, u know how we love grinding those instanced battlegrounds ;P
...im gonna try out both games, but i have my doubts i'll be sticking to warhammer... AoC should be pretty sweet with those clan castles and siege wpns..