only sucks when you can pass it cuz your fully loaded up. o0
only sucks when you can pass it cuz your fully loaded up. o0
I see nothing wrong with leaving a child in a car as long as it isn't too long like over 30 minutes or something. My dad and his gf does it all the time and they are yet to see anything go wrong. I would probs do it myself in future.
Anyways as much as it seems a silly test the minority always manage to influence another test that is needed and people with common sense has to suffer some tedious test.
i assume u mean reflex, (correcting people makes my life complete) but the thing is 7/10 drink drivers dont crash, the county i live alone around the christmas period 2,000 drivers were caught drink driving, yet there were very few deaths...Originally Posted by Syncro
the main problem that arises with drink driving, is when someone "accidently" does it, then becomes overconfident of their ability to consume alcohol, and drive at the same time, and as being drunk prooves, that you become more confident thus drive faster etc, and if you dont really feel that worried about doing it you're confidence isnt particularly phased... this combined with the fact that alcohol has the effect of screwing your perception completely means you crash...
to say 70% of all drink drivers crash is a completely random figure, id say it would realistically be under 1% of all drink drivers crash, and likewise around the same percentage are caught drink driving...
Well they most likely based it on the US or florida for my area. Most people over here dont have respect and follow the rules what so ever. They would rather take a chance of getting hit then put a blinker on. Some have lights broken and drive around all day. Most there is a chance that they are trying to scare people into not doing it by saying 70% people crash.
Reply With Quote