It's not a struggle. I am aware of my freedoms, and my restrictions and, for the most part, I accept them. The times I don't are when I can see that a large proportion of people are unhappy with the freedoms afforded to us, or to others. At that point I join with them protest. Because I have a legal rite (or freedom) to do so.
Here's an example of a freedom no-longer afforded the richest man in the world. A slave of the Roman Empire was usually free to kill another man, provided he was prepared to pay that mans's owner for his cost, if the victim was also a slave.
Here's an example of a freedom most of us are not happy about. Banks are free to loose the money we loan them and charge us for that, while at the same time charging us for money they lone us, even if we use that loan responsibly.
I'll offer another. Companies holding Genetic Patents can take legal ownership of your neighbours crops if you buy their seed stock and it cross-pollinates with his crops while he had not entered into
any contract with them.
More generally, the cost of freedom is responsibility. Each society decides what freedoms it wants to take responsibility for. The United States created a constitution to preserve certain freedoms for it's people against all future legislation, and there are many benefits to that. However, it also restricts their ability to quickly adapt their legislation should the population demand it. And even that is an implied "freedom from change" or "freedom of continuity across leadership" which nations like mine (with no written constitution) do not have.