Printable View
Kryptonite only really affects Superman at close range. Superman can very easily kill Batman without even getting within range of it to affect him.Quote:
Originally Posted by JealY
Additionally, that piece of rock is really just equipment, with the same reason you could argue that Superman could have a Sniper Rifle with armour piercing rounds, and pick Batman off from 5 miles away.
Yes, but we're talking about the characters, Batman uses gadgets - Superman doesn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
Batman, TDKR: Batman beats Superman by using Kryptonite gas. Simples.
Superman has laser eye things, pretty sure from range he could use them to destroy the Kryptonite. You cannot base the outcome on a single piece of stone, once it is out of the equation Batman has less than zero chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by JealY
My mind remains unfucked by this asinine discussion.
superman kicks ass.
No point in arguing with you, nobody will know the difference...Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
Forgive me for having too much of a life to know the exact name of his attack.Quote:
Originally Posted by JealY
The facts of this debate: Normal human man with gadgets VS superhuman with super strength, speed, agility, flight and other supernatural abilities.
No way a normal human is going to beat him. Regardless of how he is portrayed, the strength Batman exhibits is grossly exaggerated.
On Krypton, humans have superpowers and the superfolk don't.
So we'll just take Superman back to his home planet and then we can beat every superman/superwoman.
/thread.
I personally think Batman would win. Because Batman has the smarts for strategies and plans everything out instantly, Superman doesn't... he just uses his powers for everything, with out planning anything out. He just goes into combat.
I don't think superman would be good in a chess game.
Seems like this thread is about batman vs superman .
What threads aren't though? Really?Quote:
Originally Posted by rebora2007
How about Denny Crane vs Jack Bauer.Quote:
Originally Posted by DonTonberry
Cake vs pie.
Superman could pick up a brick, throw it at the speed of light at Batman. Batman couldn't dodge it, he couldn't block it, his armour wouldn't do shit.
Superman wins in any situation.
ill put it this way.Quote:
Originally Posted by GohanSSJ
The Dinosaurs laughed at Jack ... (quote from somewhere i cant remmeber)
another one, who wins
Animal old transformers or new shiny car like Transformers
this superman sounds like a badass mofo.
MIND FUCK
After reading this comment you will realize that the the brain dosent recognize a second "the"
like if you were mind fucked
Posted via Mobile Device
You mean Superman, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
He's a thick twat, Batman would outsmart him in his sleep let alone when they're going to fight...
Superman has all these amazing powers, yet he continues to get captured for Batman & the rest of the JLA to rescue him...
No, i don't. He is a HUMAN, whatever strength he possesses is about par with a martial arts expert. The "feats of strength" which he can apparently accomplish are greatly exaggerated.Quote:
Originally Posted by JealY
This is a comic/cartoon series, scenarios like that are created for the benefit of the storyline. We are basing this discussion on their abilities and strengths, how many times they have each been captured is irrelevant.
As DTB mentioned, absolutely ANY object can be picked up by Superman and used as a fatal weapon against Batman, from almost any distance.
Batman can't do a thing against Gold Superman, but just so you know, Goku would win.
We're actually talking about the characters fighting, not the abilities against each other. Superman couldn't kill Batman and he knows it, he's given Batman some green kryptonite in case he goes mad, or is ever under the effect of some red kryptonite as he knows Batman is the only one who could stop him... Superman has also admitted Batman is the only man he fears.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
You started off by admitting that this was about them fighting, then went off on a tangent and started basing your argument on something he said in a comic/cartoon.Quote:
Originally Posted by JealY
What he has said and done is absolutely irrelevant to the topic at hand - Do you actually understand that those things were written by people? Do you realize that the dialogue and storyline aren't real, and that somebody wrote it?
Let me make this perfectly clear; The storyline, the dialogue, the plot, the entire basis behind the entire comic - ALL of that is irrelevant.
What IS relevant, is what would happen if both of them fought. DO NOT start quoting me from a comic where they actually do fight and Batman wins. This is NOT about the comic or the cartoon and ANYTHING related to the rest of the series - This is about these 2 individuals ONLY, and the facts which we know about their individual fighting abilities.
I can not understand how you can be so dense.
Guys, who cares, they're just children's stories. More mindfucks please.
Of course they aren't real, but through the comic books we get to know the characters "individual fighting abilities", how can you just outright say Superman would win when you have no idea what Batman can do? And how many weaknesses Superman has? They're fictional characters, they're portrayed how the writers say they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
Here's an example; through the comics we know Batman has developed an exosuit that can actually copy the metahuman's powers and abilities, for example he could have the Green Lantern's ring power, Wonder Woman's Lasso of Truth, heck even The Flash's speed, Superman's strength or the Manhunter's invisibility... granted for a limited time, but with Batman's far greater intelligence he would kick Superman's arse with time to spare.
I'd like to see Superman even catch up to Batman when he's as quick as The Flash, let alone beat him when he has the magical powers (which Superman's vulnerable, as with mind control) of Wonder Woman and the Green Lantern...
And I started off with "it's the characters fighting" because I meant that Superman is just too "good" to kill Batman, he has to do what's good for the Human race, he would never kill him... he couldn't, even if it meant dying himself - it's his "character".
I obviously don't know nearly as much about superhero comics as you do, but i know that Bane broke Batman's back, during which Robin had to pretend to be him. Bane possesses almost no strength at all when compared to Superman. So if Bane can get the better of him, why does Superman not deserve the same benefit of the doubt?Quote:
Originally Posted by JealY
Likewise, although we can only speculate when comparing the strength of different characters, there is one thing we know for sure - Batman is only human. As such, we know what a human physically can or can not accomplish. Additionally, we also know that Kryptonite only has an effective range of 10 to 15 feet, so Superman simply has to keep at a distance.
Now, with regards to Batman's suit... It copies powers. In a battle of Superman VS Batman, there will only be Superman's powers to copy, none of which he is vulnerable to. He is almost completely immune to physical attacks, and he is also capable of traveling just as fast as 'The Flash'.
At the end of the day, the one and only hope for Batman to "win", is to get that Kryptonite within range of Superman, keep it there, then kill him while he has no powers. Superman can very easily prevent this from happening, and without that Kryptonite he has no chance.