ummm... yea !
Printable View
ummm... yea !
you cant get 250fps unless your monitor runs at 250Hz which is highly unlikelyQuote:
Originally Posted by porn man
well u can get 250fps ingame, but it wont look any different to that of 85 or whatever ur monitor refreshes at. Also scoutknives is a plain map, its not hard to get good fps on it.
Also, 60Hz is the best refresh rate :D
I'd play CS, but I'd be rubbish. Only first-person I'm any good on is Unreal Tournament =/
My properties settings on my monitor allows up to 200Hz refresh rate :D
ok, im l33t, im heaton, im cpl, im iguk, im csgn, im cb and im in sk - go suck my balls you nooborz
/morphix
:P <3
i played CS for 4 years now :)
and i play with 120 FPS on CS 1.6 on CS:S i dont really now cause cs:s is shit tbh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obbob
thought the cap was 100fps on 1.6
and source owns your story making up arse
im a noob at cs and even i know u can get more than 100fps
developer 1 in the console = moarrrrr fps!
Lol u can get more that 100 FPS easy, Download MaxFps so youre Gun Models is dissapearing and download Gamma reso that also helps and the rest is up to how good youre computer, btw theese settings i use:
rate 99999
ps_max 99999
cl_cmdrate 999
cl_updaterate 999
and more.
that solves IT !
i Notice that you guys dont know CS very good, because you didnt know that you could get more than 100 fps.....
and here is a randomly takes picture from google with a CS:S picture with FPS over 100:
http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/2382/fpscss5vf.jpg
as it happens I thought the max rates (for 1.6 at least) were:
rate 20000 online (25000 LAN)
cl_cmdrate 101
cl_updaterate 101
also, Cap is righ, if u set fps_max to 500 and enable developer 1 u can get a lot more fps, unfortunately it lowers the speed u run ingame for some reason. It's mainly for map makers to find the points that generally create the most lag (or it's what i've been told)
Edit: Oh and Obbob, ex was talking about not getting over 100fps on 1.6 not source.
CSS suk balls <--take so long to load...and if ur talking about the graphics..its not about the graphics ur talking about the model of the game...my cs 1.6 way better than css model...watch me put a ss..ima go take it right now ^_^Quote:
Originally Posted by Exclamatio
here u go :)
http://darkeden.5gigs.com/dedust.bmp
i played cs since 2001 ;p
Mmm...Counter-Strike. Can the graphics possibly get any worse? As of now I do not know of any good online shooters. I know people go insane over playing Counter-Strike, and a large majority of the people who play America's Army would hang themselves if they did not play for a whole 30 seconds. Kind of strange playing America's Army, if for example you live in Europe. Doom III isn't as famous as Counter-Strike, you might ask someone have you ever played a game called Doom? And their reply would be something like this: "Uhh...doooooom wat is dat?" I find Doom alot more enjoyable then Counter-Strike, since it is the original first person shooter. Some people try to argue Counter-Strike is better over Doom, but what can you proove? Doom was out way before Counter-Strike and Counter-Strike was made because of Doom. Doom>Quake>Half-Life. I can obviously see why more people would play the first Half-Life rather then the original Doom. Would you play a game with 2D graphics compared to a game with graphics that are so improved with better picture quality and sound effects? You can argue Half-Life being better then Doom all you want, but Doom was the original and is the best. Cant argue over hard facts, although democrats can. Way too many people use hacks on online shooters. Counter-Strike especially.
lol as usual purple comes to bum doom out of nowhere!
obbob thats not even an ingame shot, that looks like the half life2 / css gfx stress test
not an ingame shot with over 100fps
Ok... Im going to the shop to get CSS (realy).
cool, hope you enjoy it m8
remember dont play it expecting it to be the same as 1.6 because its not at all