So, Boko, I see you are posting again. Did you have a chance to educate yourself on the finer points of Relativity? How does it feel to know you were wrong the entire time?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boko
Printable View
So, Boko, I see you are posting again. Did you have a chance to educate yourself on the finer points of Relativity? How does it feel to know you were wrong the entire time?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boko
A good thing for me is that I might actually become a pilot within the next 3-4 years. Good thing to know I might actually have proof (for myself) what the truth is, even though I have no doubt in my mind that the earth is round.Quote:
Originally Posted by me that's who
I now know that the acceleration thing about your theory COULD be true (I now see no flaws in it, unless you're using the theory of relativity wrong but I doubt it). I mean, why else would you guys ACTUALLY respond to a question we're asking. However, to my other question in this topic or in the topic on your own forum you still have to reply. Other then the pole star flaw post, I have a SERIOUS problem with the conspiracy theory that HAS to have taken place in order for your theory to be correct.
If there was a conspiracy, you guys say the world's governments would have to be working together. This also means that the history as we know it is NOT true.
Why would governments who work together to keep up a conspiracy, wage war against each other? The answer on your forum to that was: 'They only appear to be disorganised to make the conspiracy seem implausible'. Don't you see what you guys are doing here? Not only do you say the earth is flat with this message, you're also telling us that all the wars which have happened over the last hundreds of years happened because the governments of the world didn't want to make the theory seem plausible.
Hello?! Don't you guys realise how retarded that is? You guys would then have to believe that the current war in Iraq is only happening because of your conspiracy. Not only Iraq, but EVERYTHING which has to have happened since the world's governments decided to work together. The Cold War, World War 1 & 2 and every other war that happened in the last century would then be a big LIE. All those people that died in those wars would have been to keep up a stupid conspiracy. All that just for money? We could have had WORLD PEACE, but NO! The governments would rather make it SEEM the governments to be disorganised. They don't mind all those people dying, it's not the government that dies. Tbh, the world's governments seriously cant be THAT stupid to throw away an oppurtunity to world peace to get some easy cash or anything else. If there was a chance at world peace, they would have taken it.
The real truth is that the world's governments have NOT been working together (not all of them anyways). This is simple logic. The morals and values of the people and the governments in the world are just too far apart to be able to create a joint-venture of this magnitude.
Some parts of your theory might be 'plausible', but that doesn't make the conspiracy part any more retarded. And I have yet to get an answer to my pole star problem. I suggest you guys look into that first...
Just because the acceleration thing could actually work, only makes your theory a little bit more plausible. And as I said before, I still have to get an answer to my previous question about the pole star.Quote:
Originally Posted by me that's who
earth is flat as moon is a painting of god or a bulb in satans ceiling
XD
Well... lets put it this way... if you throw a hunk of flat cheese at a wall... something happens... what?
Someone set up a paypal so people can donate to send them out into space.
Nooo... give me the money!!! I already believe the world is round!
You guys can talk all you want about relativity, but 'Bob', or whoever u say is NOT on earth, simply has nothing to do with this.
It's rather simple really.
You say that if you're in a car, the car doesn't accelerate relative to you.
Well in fact that's wrong. It does accelerate relative to you, it's just that your seat is stopping you from falling behind.
If something doesn't accelerate relative to you, you wouldn't be effected.
But in a car, or on the earth, you are.
There's just something which counter-acts the acceleration.
The car DOES accelerate relative to you, for you have no speed of your own, and the ONLY thing making you go along with it is a seat, which acts to counter the effects of the acceleration.
But What Happens With The Cheese????
Good explenation. Everything is relative ^^Quote:
Originally Posted by xeLJoYo
obviously they have proven the relativity of cheese acceleration in space/time creating a time machine... so when einstein actually prove the relativity a cheese was not enough so he threw 2 hunks the second one travelling at such a speed that it went back in time and hit the monkey at the center of the earth that is running at lightspeed and generating gravity
Only problem is the theory of relativity which was proven by Einstein. According to Einstein, you can continuously accelerate (even at the speed they are talking about with the flat-earth theory) without reaching the speed of light. The acceleration could actually be true (in theory), just check out the theory of relativity if you don't believe it.Quote:
Originally Posted by linklink88
Problem with these guys is that they aren't responding to questions that they cannot answer. We should now realise that when they actually try to explain something, it could actually be true (in theory). Problem is, Newton acknowledged gravity and Einstein did aswell. These guys are using Einstein's theory even though they do not believe in gravity. I think this could cause a problem, don't you guys? Still have to find out what this problem is though.
But like I said, the problem with these guys is that they don't reply to problems they cannot answer (like my pole star problem). I still as of yet have to get a reply to that...
I'm sorry, but that is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.Quote:
Originally Posted by xeLJoYo
Relative to me in the driver's seat, the car is not accelerating. Do you know what an acceleration is? It is the rate of change over time of velocity, which is the rate of change over time of position. If I am the same distance from the steering wheel for the entire acceleration, my rate of change in position is zero. Therefore, my velocity is zero, which means my rate of change of velocity is zero, which means that my acceleration is zero.
The seat is what allows me to accelerate at the same rate as the car, therefore, relative to me, the car is not moving.
this is the kind of website that makes me want to punch a baby in the face, its funny as hell but for the people who take it seriously they need to have a serious reality check
No we learnt from another post that punching babies in the face is bad especially when they pull the cord on the xbox 360 apparently.Quote:
Originally Posted by sparx
Here's a question: to a FE, what about the common view (RE) does not make sense? What findings by man and science make the possibility of round earth ridiculous and impossible? Why could someone not accept the world may be round?
I can see that if we're accelerating then on a round earth the people on the "bottom" side would drop, but this requires the assumption world is flat and hence won't contribute.
As someone who (obviously) thinks the world is round, nothing discovered fights against this image, but a lot of things say the world can't be flat. As explained so far, apparently physics (for the part discussed) allow for a flat earth to exist, but the way the FE see it, couldn't the round one?