Either way. We're right, they're wrong. We win, they lose. I'm god, you aren't. If you think the earth is flat, you should get the death penalty.
Printable View
Either way. We're right, they're wrong. We win, they lose. I'm god, you aren't. If you think the earth is flat, you should get the death penalty.
I say this statement is ignorant because you have obviously missed the fact that circumnavigation is perfectly possible on a flat Earth.Quote:
You know, all you have to do is go on a 1 day flight....get in the air, set your GPS and just fly...keep on the same set path, and guess what, YOU'LL END UP IN THE SAME F*CKEN SPOT...you sir, are a retard.
You can. That doesn't make your statements meaningful though.Quote:
So until you guys go out, Set a GPS and just fly for a good day. (or more depending on the type of plane) I can make all the ignorant statements I want.
That being because the FAQ is there for the sole purpose of answering Questions which are Asked Frequently, and not, as many of you have said, as the "basis of our theory".Quote:
And further more, I'm reading the FAQs on your site, and all of your answers have no proof what so ever to back it up...they're just statements.
...or be forced to walk to the poles to see that it really *is* round.
About acceleration of the earth @ 1g: In theory it is possible, for those who dont believe it just check out Einstein's theory of relativity.
To 'me that's who': Stop discussing something you have already answered, and start answering questions which were asked but neglected to answer (maybe because you cant answer them?). I also agree with Negata's question why the earth can't be round. Is there something wrong about the theory we believe in?
Questions you still have to answer:
- this one (the part of the Zetetic Astronomy, the acceleration part was already explained)
- this one (If you believe in the FE theory, you also believe everything we know in this world is a lie, including all of our history. Just read the post more carefully)
- this one (you still haven't answered why the RE theory can't be possible)
A big part of the answers say everything is a conspiracy. A conspiracy as a part of a theory (and it is a VERY big conspiracy you guys are talking about, just read my post about it) doesn't make it at all believable now does it?
I don't know the answer for this, although I thought it was explained in Earth not a Globe.
And? You're basically saying that the conspiracy is improbable, which is meaningless given the fact that if Earth is flat, a conspiracy exists.Quote:
- this one (If you believe in the FE theory, you also believe everything we know in this world is a lie, including all of our history. Just read the post more carefully)
No one ever said the RE theory is impossible. It simply does not match up with personal observation, and is fundamentally flawed when using the Zetetic method.Quote:
Actually, very few answers given have anything to do with the conspiracy whatsoever.Quote:
A big part of the answers say everything is a conspiracy. A conspiracy as a part of a theory (and it is a VERY big conspiracy you guys are talking about, just read my post about it) doesn't make it at all believable now does it?
I heard the goverment is trying to get in contact with boko because he is planning to become a pilot - they must brainwash them.
Read the post better. I examined 'Earth not a Globe' and I say it is flawed. That's why I asked that question...
It is not meaningless, because if the theory is true the conspiracy also has to be true! The conspiracy is a theory itself inside your flat earth theory. If you want to prove the Flat Earth theory, you also have to prove the conspiracy. And I say the conspiracy of this size is not possible.
The FE does not match up with personal observation either (the sun not 'setting', it actually being an optical illusion). And like I said earlier, I consider the Zetetic method flawed.
The first couple of questions then. Not that it matters, it matters that the conspiracy is a very big part of your theory (in my opinion). Every answer to your questions (or most of them anyways) suggest there is a conspiracy.
No way! :eek:
No, if the FE theory is true the conspiracy is true, as a natural consequence of Earth being flat. This means that any evidence for or against the conspiracy is meaningless because disproving the conspiracy requires first proving that Earth is not flat.
It should also be noted that whether or not the conspiracy is probable has no bearing on whether or not the conspiracy exists.
In what way is the Zetetic method flawed?Quote:
The FE does not match up with personal observation either (the sun not 'setting', it actually being an optical illusion). And like I said earlier, I consider the Zetetic method flawed.
Simply because every one of our answers suggests that Earth is flat.Quote:
The first couple of questions then. Not that it matters, it matters that the conspiracy is a very big part of your theory (in my opinion). Every answer to your questions (or most of them anyways) suggest there is a conspiracy.