The future is in Kombucha?

[Forumer]

A good day to all of you, fine sirs.

I have recently discovered this magical tea from China, which has been hailed as an elixir of health. It is called Kombucha, and it leaves the body feeling a fine state indeed. It can be brewed with any of our fine teas (minus Earl Gray, apparently there is an oil in our finest tea that can kill the culture), and boasts immediate health benefits. It is not a traditional tea, but instead a bacterial culture that thrives when mixed with tea. A range of flavors can be found inside this brew to please even the most sophisticated of palettes.

As it costs a pretty penny to buy retail, I have considered brewing it myself in my humble estate, though I have met some confusion with the proper techniques on doing so. Have any of you attempted this endeavor? If so, what are some hints you could lay upon me?

[MentaL]

[Forumer]

No one is answering? You dont care about our future? So be it fine sirs, but you'll regret later.

[LordDemonMan]

[Forumer]

Well, sir, I see you are narrow-minded if you dont mind for calling you fine sir like that. You just replied, thanks sir.

[.YourName]

actually, the future is in my piss.

wouldnt ya know

[LordDemonMan]

Well, sir, I see you are narrow-minded if you dont mind for calling you, fine sir, like that. You just replied, thanks sir.

How curious, for you to call me narrow-minded.
The nature of my reply is paradoxical, dear sir. You see, a reply is something, that carries certain information that, in turn, relays the opinion of the very subject that decided to reply. However, a reply that merely has a picture, that certainly does not answer your query, for words cannot be really defined as a traditional reply, in fact, it is preposterous by its nature because it is a oft pre-made stereotypical picture.
But what could have caused me to use such an unconventional way of pseudo-replying?
This section is particularly unique. If you were to wonder why it is considered unique, read the rules of this very section and you shall be blessed with knowledge regarding the reason of the eccentric behaviour of local denizens.
As for the very answer to the question: I was objective, this means - I was not expressing my own opinion, merely being the medium between your ignorance and reality. "But why a picture?", you might protest. I merely wanted to see the following reaction my pseudo-reply might cause. And I must confess, the reaction was just like the one expected.
An amalgam of objectivity and subjectivity, a paradox, some might say, however, this is the way the things work here, dear sir.
All in all, while my post is considered a reply, my reply is not really a reply, but, as I have pointed out previously, a pseudo-reply.

[Forumer]

How curious, for you to call me narrow-minded.
The nature of my reply is paradoxical, dear sir. You see, a reply is something, that carries certain information that, in turn, relays the opinion of the very subject that decided to reply. However, a reply that merely has a picture, that certainly does not answer your query, for words cannot be really defined as a traditional reply, in fact, it is preposterous by its nature because it is a oft pre-made stereotypical picture.
But what could have caused me to use such an unconventional way of pseudo-replying?
This section is particularly unique. If you were to wonder why it is considered unique, read the rules of this very section and you shall be blessed with knowledge regarding the reason of the eccentric behaviour of local denizens.
As for the very answer to the question: I was objective, this means - I was not expressing my own opinion, merely being the medium between your ignorance and reality. "But why a picture?", you might protest. I merely wanted to see the following reaction my pseudo-reply might cause. And I must confess, the reaction was just like the one expected.
An amalgam of objectivity and subjectivity, a paradox, some might say, however, this is the way the things work here, dear sir.
All in all, while my post is considered a reply, my reply is not really a reply, but, as I have pointed out previously, pseudo-reply.

Joy, another fine gentleman to talk with.

[Moofin]

Chinese medicine don't work.

[Daney]

lmao @ LordDemonMan's pic.

and wtf @ above, noodles aren't medicine?

[Alphabeat]

Never heard of Kombucha.

[frozenrat]

Well, sir, I see you are narrow-minded if you dont mind for calling you fine sir like that. You just replied, thanks sir.

STFU Habbotard.

You have to be narrow minded to play that game.
xD

[I Rule MU]

How curious, for you to call me narrow-minded.
The nature of my reply is paradoxical, dear sir. You see, a reply is something, that carries certain information that, in turn, relays the opinion of the very subject that decided to reply. However, a reply that merely has a picture, that certainly does not answer your query, for words cannot be really defined as a traditional reply, in fact, it is preposterous by its nature because it is a oft pre-made stereotypical picture.
But what could have caused me to use such an unconventional way of pseudo-replying?
This section is particularly unique. If you were to wonder why it is considered unique, read the rules of this very section and you shall be blessed with knowledge regarding the reason of the eccentric behaviour of local denizens.
As for the very answer to the question: I was objective, this means - I was not expressing my own opinion, merely being the medium between your ignorance and reality. "But why a picture?", you might protest. I merely wanted to see the following reaction my pseudo-reply might cause. And I must confess, the reaction was just like the one expected.
An amalgam of objectivity and subjectivity, a paradox, some might say, however, this is the way the things work here, dear sir.
All in all, while my post is considered a reply, my reply is not really a reply, but, as I have pointed out previously, pseudo-reply.

Hahahaha I love you!

[Omer]

STFU Habbotard.

You have to be narrow minded to play that game.
xD

That's why it's 2D duh.

[Forumer]

STFU Habbotard.

You have to be narrow minded to play that game.
xD

Fine sir, you call me a Habbotard? No, I cannot play habbo because I am afraid of the black afro negros, deary me!

[frozenrat]

Fine sir, you call me a Habbotard? No, I cannot play habbo because I am afraid of the black afro negros, deary me!

http://forum.ragezone.com/search.php...9&pp=50&page=3

[Pieman]

Stop talking like a goddamn queer.

[Forumer]

My, my, I am so famous even Pieman answered to one of my threads, why hello there, favorite moderator.
Your proof doesn't work, frozenrat.
'Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms.'

[Jamie]

You're a failure in life, sir.

[frozenrat]

My, my, I am so famous even Pieman answered to one of my threads, why hello there, favorite moderator.
Your proof doesn't work, frozenrat.
'Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms.'

It works fine for me.


[Blue part is secondary monitor.]

[joorohoo]

god decides the future

[Forumer]

You're a failure in life, sir.

A bigger than you? i'd say no, sir. You were born by a chemical accident, and I'm honest fellow sir.

[Jamie]

A bigger than you? i'd say no, sir. You were born by a chemical accident, and I'm honest fellow sir.

Your a test tube baby.

[Forumer]

DEAR SIR! I'm gonna apologise, I must say.
and frozenrat, it must be my nephew.

[Forumer]

JAMIE, O RLY? Such a MILF.

[joorohoo]

gtfo you asshole