To the one who keeps deleting threads in spamzilla

While I agree with what you're saying, you're missing my point. It's better to give an explanation for your actions than to leave people wondering just what the hell happened. As I mentioned above closing the the thread with a clear warning in it will give people an idea of what is allowed and what isn't in spamzilla or ragezone for that matter, regardless of if they participated in the flaming.

I do not know if infractions were handed out, but its still better to set a public example than a private one. Or even better, just do both.

For the record it was me and lee. any problems then fuck off.

if you don't like our moderating style then too bad, it's one of those times where making an example of a person isn't needed in public because doing it in private is enough.

I'm not having people stoning others because they broke the rules, we are the ones who enforce them not you lot.

the reported posts are helpfull but when you act like a cocky little bastard it gets very irritating and if I recall pieman you're the number one offender for reporting dodgey spamzilla posts so stfu.

Negata I really don't believe that locking a thread is always that effective, granted there's freedom of speech and what ever other equal rights things there are but I don't want to have people searching for a flame thread just to see who's gotten in trouble at the end of it. How does that show a good example to anyone?

we're harsh enough to rule breakers as it is and we really don't have to explain our actions to you when they concern threads that were clearly breaking the rules. this thread is as pointless as a dancing cow on ice skates.

:lock: