And how do you just decide how to live? Most people don't decide to be poor so they have to live in crappy neighbourhoods.
Printable View
And how do you just decide how to live? Most people don't decide to be poor so they have to live in crappy neighbourhoods.
Yea but they can lkook for ojobs etr.
to get out of there place.
The world doesn't work like that, yes 1 person can do that, but they will always be replaced by someone else. Someone has to do the crappy jobs with the crappy pay, and if everyone in the crappy places wanted to get a nice house, then all the sudden their would be a massive need for houses.
Accept the world for what it is, and in the case of the US it means people will live in dangerous neighbourhoods because they can't afford better.
I would say that USA is safer in the fact that if someone does attack it, then they have enouph to fight back.
UK is safer in the fact of terrorist not flying planes into there biggest building, and war.
But I actually have no idea
Ehm... yes the US has enough to attack back, but you have to understand 2 things.
1. No one is stupid enough to attack Europe, it doesn't matter who attacks, they will be defeated in no time, not just by Europe obviously, but also by every major power in this world, including the US, ofcourse if the US attacked then they wouldn't, but there is enough combined power in this world to crush the US, and if anyone would attack Europe, then they would get crushed.
2. Why would anyone attack Europe (or the UK in specific), it's the US who has all the enemies, Europe has the same enemies as everyone else has, extremist who are to weak to take on Europe.
See that's why Europe can't be beaten (well unless you nuke it, can't do much against that - but same goes for the US), Europe tries to better the world, tries to help the world and bring peace to it in ways that won't be (so) offensive to those who we are trying to help, and Europe is important to this world due to it's wealth and all that, no one wants to get rid of Europe, no one wants war with us. The US on the other hand is disliked by many, even hated, that's because the US (or atleast under it's current "leadership") doesn't care what others think, so they do what they think it's right, and right now the US thinks they can accomplish anything aslong as they have power and use it whenever and whereever they want, and that's why it gets attacked.
So trust me, Europe doesn't need all that power, the power it has is more then enough to defend itself against extremists and to help other countries, and if someone would launch a full attack on Europe, then they will be helped by pretty much all the major powers in this world.
USA, just dont go down dark alleys at night time
Yeah you still don't get it do you.
In either case the UK will be safer, it's just that simple. If you don't agree then you should check the crime statistics.
This is not about whether you can live safely in both countries. it's about which is safer and the UK simply is.
No its not, if you go to some silent village in the US its the same as the UK.
Its where you go IN that country that counts not the country itself.
You don't get it now do you...
First of all it's not about a single individual, it's about the overall country.
Second, not everyone can live in some quiet village... or it would no longer be quiet.
And even then, the fact is that the whole US is filled with guns, no matter where you live, people around you will have guns.
Yeah but, nevermind your right I'm talking about something other shit.
Mostly on the news if something involving terrorism it is usually in the uk or usa so I would choose antartica any day of the week, but I do feel that america is more prone to terrorist attacks as it is veiwed as one of the most powerful countries around, the uk is simply 2nd so I vote UK to be safer as you hear about mass murders that are happening in america but then again you might hear these things about UK, but still I vote UK.