Sound on 60 seconds and color (Dead) Tags

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sensor

May i ask why you needed to write this and also what you wrote it about?

---

why do you care lol. :mindownbusiness:

OT: Dont even try to do something like this if you cannot even use pointers

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

why do you care lol. :mindownbusiness:

OT: Dont even try to do something like this if you cannot even use pointers

---

So is there any problems with my coding style?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aV3PQmCJjM9L

So is there any problems with my coding style?

---

i didnt see. its just disgusting because adding a sound effect became a spam thread. its like OMFG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

why do you care lol. :mindownbusiness:

OT: Dont even try to do something like this if you cannot even use pointers

---

I am trying to learn by understanding the code, but yeah, I need the code. I am trying to understand how things work. If that is a problem to you well sorry. A month ago I knew nothing about C++, did not even know how to compile, now I know a little bit more. Every day I work on this I'm learning new things. If you learned C++ in 1 month, congrats. I don't, so don't hate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

i didnt see. its just disgusting because adding a sound effect became a spam thread. its like OMFG

---

It will not be big problem. Rather I love multi-threading applications. It makes good efficiency.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

why do you care lol. :mindownbusiness:

OT: Dont even try to do something like this if you cannot even use pointers

---

Please do give me proper usage of a pointer.

Pointers

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

Pointers

---

I asked you to give me a proper usage, not to google "pointers" and link me to some MSDN article.

So, again, can you please give me proper usage of a pointer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wizkidje

I asked you to give me a proper usage, not to google "pointers" and link me to some MSDN article.

So, again, can you please give me proper usage of a pointer.

---

ahh, its like adressing one variable to other.. if I'm not wrong.
Like Testme is value of Dont.

Dont * Testme

where variable (testme) is pointed to (dont) .
Now stop !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

ahh, its like adressing one variable to other.. if I'm not wrong.
Like Testme is value of Dont.

Dont * Testme

where variable (testme) is pointed to (dont) .
Now stop !

---

Nope, the (Dont) class's (also struct or typedef) pointer variable (Testme) is pointed to invalid location.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aV3PQmCJjM9L

Nope, the (Dont) class's (also struct or typedef) pointer variable (Testme) is pointed to invalid location.

---

I'm just explaining a basic concept & declaration

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

I'm just explaining a basic concept & declaration

---

However your "basic concept & declaration" was quite inaccurate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

ahh, its like adressing one variable to other.. if I'm not wrong.
Like Testme is value of Dont.

Dont * Testme

where variable (testme) is pointed to (dont) .
Now stop !

---

Nope, not even close. Proper usage would be something like

PHP Code:

---

class Test {
    public:
        char m_szTest[512];
};

void doSomething(Test *pTest) {
    strcpy(pTest->m_szTest, "Pointer");
}

void main() {
    Test *pTest = new Test();
    doSomething(pTest);
    printf("%s\n", pTest->m_szTest);
    delete pTest;
} 


---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

You just find people to underetimate.

---

No. You're the one trying to point out he's better than Sensor (here).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

m not kind of guy like george to get furious by such chats.

---

And you're doing it once more. Funny thing to blame me for trying to bash people while you're the one actually bashing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

+ i never googled what i wrote by myself.

---

Yeah, hence it being incorrect.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronny786

+ it is correct enough

---

Not really, no. Doing "Dont * Testme" in C++ (assuming both are variables), your compiler will multiply "Dont" with "Testme". You know, as in 1 * 1 = 1.

Peter dude.. I was just trying to explain in short.
Only i wanted to say '*' this matters. i provided good def though.
Chuck topic!