lol you sure it will run safely at 4.6GHz? tell me the results iam interested in it.Originally Posted by Rishwin
lol you sure it will run safely at 4.6GHz? tell me the results iam interested in it.
It runs @ 50 degrees (on full load) @ 4.2Ghz. It safely operates below 80ish degrees, so i could probably even get it to 5Ghz if i wanted to, but i won't :P
nigger vic
wait for sandy bridge that comes out in like 9-10 days.
Is there any specification on that yet?
I'm currently using the 6core AMD Processor. My brother also has an i7 bloomfield which is OC'd. In practical use there is no difference. This whole Intel vs AMD stuff is pointless. When you put it push to shove you will see nothing has changed. Like a few have said today's processors are to advanced for what we have today. Even the most demanding games can run on 5 year old hardware which the exception of the GPU. If you want more bang for buck get the AMD but the real bottle neck in computers in the HDD which once SSD's lower in price won't be an issue anymore.
the future is fusion
i was reading about it and nothing that special..
It's good if you are not overclocking thanks to higher stock clocks. It's not as good if you are overclocking since intel's a money minded bastard and wants you to pay more to get an unlocked processor.
My laptop includes AMD and Intel Core i3 together, when you put on the charger AMD goes active and intel core goes down, when you remove the charger Intel Core goes active, its basically a power saving system
I think AMD will do better
---------- Post added at 04:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:08 PM ----------
you have Ghz turbo boost?
Wut? Probably you are getting it wrong. It should be with your graphics processor, when you are plugged in the discrete works, when on batt, the intel integrated one works to save power.
It's an overclock
Yeah sorry it was my graphics processor
Intel in my opinion is better then AMD!
An old story, AMD was hot around 1999-2005, when first Athlon came. Now its not, if you compare temperatures from Gigabyte MB and Asus you can see the same AMD processors 5-15 degrees cooler on the GB mobo.
Faster,Cooler, more efficiently - just the right MOBO.
yes, 6 FAKE cores sometimes bring more performance in few areas, sometimes.
Primarily but not fully, we need better processor when we have bigger, better or alot of videocards.
did you click the link? try it, it will help you. what stops Intel from cheating your 3DMark/PCMark scores with their drivers?
what are you waiting for? pure proof that AMD has something faster than your i5.
No, its the intel drivers messing with the benchmarking software.
Your 4.2 Ghz of performance will be equal to ~4.0GHz of the 1075T.
Gaming Performance, well, aside from the benchmarking software, do some Gaming tests yourself with the processors i already mentioned before.
Another thing is that the i7 six core costs ~3 times more than the six core Phenom.
some times things are not as they look, you look smart enough to benchmark the games yourself.
Another thing you can do is start working in Computer-Service and compare the stuff yourself, before then, u can only read and count your faked scores/cores.
If better means who has the fastest desktop processor then YES, but if we compare Prices, then NO.
Last edited by penihop; 31-12-10 at 07:54 PM.
No, AMD chips have ALWAYS run hotter because they use a higher voltage. The "old stories" you are talking about is because back then, the Athlon processors had TINY points of contact with the heatsink, which made for horrible heat transfer. They then followed Intel by covering the entire CPU die with a solid metal contact point.
The normal operating temperature for your average Athlon chip is roughly 55-65 degrees. The average temperature for a Core2Duo chip is more between 30-40 degrees. These are stock clocks with oem coolers.
Before we go any further here, you ARE aware that you are talking to a qualified IT technician and network/systems administrator, right? Because it looks to me like you are simply pulling stuff you "heard on the internet" into a sentence to make yourself sound smart. Trust me, you have no clue what you're talking about.
Now what the hell are you talking about "fake" cores? Your arguments are flawed at best and display the exact same fanboy tactics people use to "prove" that god exists.
No, CPU's nowadays are almost never the bottleneck, especially when you are looking ad quad and hex cores.
You DO realize that the "CPU test" in 3DMark actually has ZERO significance, right? You DO know that it is simply used as a tool for bragging rights, correct? All that test does is sees how well your CPU performs if it is doing all of the GFX rendering WITHOUT THE HELP OF THE GFX CARD.
Time? Contrary to your own beliefs, Futuremark doesn't make it a habit of paying people just because their benchmark scores are high.
Ahuh.
Every single word of that is bullshit, how the fuck do you even know how to operate a computer?
what stops AMD from cheating your 3DMark/PCMark scores with their drivers?
Right back at ya mate
Reply With Quote