well i think these 2 are better than be4.. but plz tell me which 1 is better: 1. or 2. .. C&C welcomed ;)
1.
2.
well i think these 2 are better than be4.. but plz tell me which 1 is better: 1. or 2. .. C&C welcomed ;)
1.
2.
None of 'em are any good.
better than the 1 before?.. and can u give some C&C plx ^^
Ok, I will. The font is bad, so is the compo. I don't like the effects at all.
Read som tut's, then come back again.
may I ask which site did u learn to make sigs from? ^^.. or if u know any good ones.. with good explanation
Planetrenders.com
Uhmm 2nd One loooks good, ONly teh render. Uhmmmmmmmmm Try a new brush?
Thats al I Could say, And put effort into your sigs to make it look sexier.
I don't like the second one at all.
The glow looks foolish with the fill turned all the way down.
Both of them arn't very good tbh.
The only thing that I like about it is the font, it's quite nice.
3/10.
Xriss don't even come to the GfX if your not going to give proper freaking CnC feedback, just telling him to look at tuts isn't going to help him.Originally Posted by xriss
Anyways, back on topic.
You need improvement, the render is really not that noticable, it doesn't show up so well in the sig.
The text is a bit to big and blends in with the background so it doesn't stand out well.
I suggest using a better font, so you can see it clearly.
And as for the background, work on the effects a bit more, you have the right idea but i suggest using a different method or whatnot?
ok thank you ;).. am reading tuts.. making sigs all the time ^^.. asking friends for help.. and ty u guys ;).. gonna post a new one soon
Remember what I told you @ MSN :)
yup.. and thx m8.. got me thinking in another direction ;)
Next time add a border ;)
