CnC ;)
this or my current?
CnC ;)
this or my current?
Either you got some inspiration from Nut or you're both suing the same tutorials.
Anyways, the font and text generally is just way off. And i think those "blocks" are way too big and visible.
well, ive seen these tutorials before, and i saw his newest sig, and wanted to make one like it, although i didnt follow any tutorials.Originally Posted by Flawz
im not good with text..at all.
and there is only one block, but i guess i could make it smaller
There's one under the text and one straight infront of the granny, or am i just hallucinating?
woops, musta missed it :P
ill fix it later :P
Like the design and theme, stock just seems weird for sig material.
Like your current one better, First i don't like the fact that you would put granny in your sig lol, second I don't like the font, otherwise bg is nicely done. 7/10.
Not to be a flamer or a hater. But I'm really getting tired of this C4D style you guys use. It's kinda boring now. :( But well done on the signature.
You guys ? and you can make alot of styles using c4ds.. elaborate ?
about the sig .. i dont like the pink stuff at the left of the sig .. and the " blocks " are too big as flawz already mentioned earlier .. otherwise it's not bad
if you dont know what the hell your talking about, dont say it, because there are absolutely NO C4Ds in this sig.
and besides, what amazing piece of art have you made, cause i havent seen anything?
as for the pink thing, its her leg :P
and ill fix the blocks when i can, im a little busy right now
Stop cryin, the dude stated his opinion and he is right. The effect is gettin old and boring now.
What effect? there was no c4d's in the first place.because there are absolutely NO C4Ds in this sig.
i think that c4d oppinion/statement was an Offtopic one.. nice avatar Ben :rofl:
Stop the immature fucking arguing. people i haven't see done shit in the past 3 months are posting about stuff they obviously have no idea of what they are talking about.
I don't see any C4D in this signature, and even if it did, it's his choice of style. And even if 99% of the people in the portfolio would have a C4D signature it still wouldn't matter, since the person is asking about C&C not what kind of signatures they should and should not be doing.
Post what you think about the signature and not the style.
Neat but I've seen quite a few with this style and make from you. Maybe something different sometime. 9/10.
The Fuckin Effect Of The Fuckin Signature Is Gettin Old Wil Ya Understand Goddamnit..
i agree on the style comments
but the sig is pretty nice fix the blocks and the font and its good to go
first of all, i wasnt crying
and second, he was talking about the C4D effect, and there are no C4Ds in this sig, so YOU sir obviously are the one that doesnt understand.
and for the people that aren ignorant, thank you for you comments
i completely got rid of one of the blocks, and made the other smaller
comments?
So now I'm ignorant you piece of #"!". I said he was right about the C4D's and didnt even comment on your signature, just agreed with his statement. Im gettin fuckin bored of the effect and THAT WHAT I SAID. EVERYONE is using it and it gettin boring, and im going to repeat that everytime I see a signature with a stockbackground and same after effects or look like that. I'm probally going to get infracted twice, ok, but don't delete my post. I'm free to say what ever the #
[QUOTE=CrownC;2243912]So now I'm ignorant you piece of #"!". I said he was right about the C4D's and didnt even comment on your signature, just agreed with his statement. Im gettin fuckin bored of the effect and THAT WHAT I SAID. EVERYONE is using it and it gettin boring, and im going to repeat that everytime I see a signature with a stockbackground and same after effects or look like that. I'm probally going to get infracted twice, ok, but don't delete my post. I'm free to say what ever the #
