Meh here it is, haven't done anything in photoshop for a year or so, figured I'd give it a go agian, C&C, and give me the truth, I know its terrible, no lies to make me feel better. And yes, text was never my strong point.
Meh here it is, haven't done anything in photoshop for a year or so, figured I'd give it a go agian, C&C, and give me the truth, I know its terrible, no lies to make me feel better. And yes, text was never my strong point.
i aint such a pro but imo I think theres to much .. well hmm.. crowdy or how would i say :P.. and yea.. the name.. try to put it in there ;) .. otherwise its quite catchy .. if u gonna put the name in.. i got some great fonts.. if ud like them.. pm me
There to much going on in the centre with the purple lights and such.
5/10
- I like the colour scheme.
- Too busy around it all.
- Backing texture is ugly.
- Font is small.
Everything except the brightness and render are good.
The render is too bright, so it's really hrad to see. Also, the contrast in it makes the sig hard on the eye.
Make a brughtnedd and contrast layer and tone down the contrast.
I think am the only one who fails to see the "render" in that pic. Is one even there? :O
i was just about to say that when i entered...Originally Posted by iNs@nE
No there isn't a render, its one or two c4d's and the rest of it is from filters/stock PS brushes.
I don't think all signatures have to have a render. Tho I must admit they look alot better with them.I think am the only one who fails to see the "render" in that pic. Is one even there? :O
