Just made a signature fora friend of mine so thought of posting it here.
Just made a signature fora friend of mine so thought of posting it here.
I love your low colour work...
I would prefer it in color, it looks depthless=/
9/10, maybe making the guy behind the cards a little more blurred, it will have more deepness :P
still, i like it a lot!
Can you PM me the render pl0x
You know what, f-- it. Read some tutorials. The text is boring and not interactive. The stock \ render is way too hidden since it's originally so dark already. I fail to see what's been done to it. Possibly a c4d to the right of the stock, but that's it. The lighting is incorrect and the depth doesn't exist.
Last edited by Flawz; 30-05-08 at 05:53 AM.
Not bad.
But i think it just looks plain.
LOL. Okay. :)Originally Posted by Flawz
But I do wanna ask you one thing - When you spoke of the stock / render ... What exactly in the signature were you referring to?
I hardly understand your question, but what part of "way too hidden since it's originally so dark already" don't you understand?
If you have a dark stock and add more darkness it will hardly be visible. All I see now is a face, assuming it is one. Do you want me to make a powerpoint presentation?
hmmm flawz seems pissed anyways parts of the render is abit blury and their doesnt seem to be an arm there
No, I'm not pissed. Really. I'm only being honest. Those skilled artists, those that have left The Portfolio due to all retardation would agree with me. They're just not here to do so.
Well for a start, the primary conc of the signature are the cards and not Gambit.
You talk about light sources. If you kind of look at the picture, you can see multi-layers (considering the path of vision) ..The cards come before Gambit does and hence the blur and darkness on the face of Gambit.
And you also speak of lighting in the signature. If you look at it, there is just one light source originating below the signature and pretty much the light on the signature is justified.
The text really wasn't my concern when I was making it. So maybe yes it might be sucky.
The reason I asked you was coz you were considering Gambit to be of primary conc and not the cards when the whole damn signature was made based on the ace cards. ;(
If you really do think that the so called "skilled artists" left this place due to all the retardation in this section - maybe it's just better that you follow them too coz this is where people learn and if you cant accept people making starter signatures then there's really not much me nor any one can do to make you feel better in here.
And maybe this signature totally sucks and maybe all the one's I did - but it's rather you actually observe the picture next time before you make a comment coz from the angle from which the sig was made and the angle from which your comments were posted pretty much sound senseless..
Well doesnt matter. I did ask for opinion and I will consider yours.
Thank You. Till the day comes - PEACE!
Yes, I've seen your cards are progressively blurred to create some sort of depth, no need to write a damn bible about it. This is how it works. If you want to create depth using blur, everything need to be progressively blurred and not just a region. This is how it looks right now (assuming the higher number the more blurrier it is): 1-2-3-4-1
1 is the first card to the left, which have no blur making it look like it's first in place and more "forward" than the rest.
2 is the second card, little blur is applied
3 is the third card, more blur
4 is the forth card, assuming there are 4 and not less \ more, with more blur
Now 1 comes in again, why? cause the stock which is the FACE have NO clear blur applied to it, which makes positioned in the same 3D space as the FIRST card.
Is he throwing the cards? Is he holding them? Are they flying towards him? No, We cant possibly know that cause the stock is hidden in darkness. Which was my FIRST point.
I think that's pretty funny coming from a person telling everyone to read tutorials. So let me correct you.
But hey! Don't assume I'm fighting with you, this is just a discussion. This is where we ask for Constructive Criticism, no need to act like I'm hitting you with a sledge hammer. I'm probably the only one here who's given you real criticism.
And leave the section mod-less? Flawz is currently very active in making tut's so why in the world should he leave?If you really do think that the so called "skilled artists" left this place due to all the retardation in this section - maybe it's just better that you follow them too coz this is where people learn and if you cant accept people making starter signatures then there's really not much me nor any one can do to make you feel better in here.
another thing bothers me
Gambit Signature for Masenkothis.Well for a start, the primary conc of the signature are the cards and not Gambit.
And the other thing it's really hard to use the depth in black and white signatures. Please go back to color signatures it suits you betters=/
5/10 ?
I think it's an okay signature..
I'll agree with everyone else.. it's slightly blurry..
I guess you are focusing on the cards, because it looks like gambit is hiding his face, as though he has a bad case of acne.
- JOSH.
I guess! PEACE!
