Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Scratch.
You are doing it wrong, you cant just post this like the way you want to. i am sure that the designer of the 5th sign took your post very disrespectful, and as a ex-mod you shouldn't act like you just did. This kind of posts just gives the other members the agreement of you being demoted before.
And if you are going to say that the 4th is the best, at least give us some facts.
Ok,
I sadly disagree with his infraction and this comment.
Each user is allowed there own opinon on a signature. Not allowing him to have an opinon and infracting him for having opinon beats the whole point of having a public vote. Saying some ones signature is gay is not an attack on the user or disrespectful. Why it could have been put into better words such as "Number 5 sucks" the point is the same.
The infraction seems to be serious overkill with no actuall point.
If your not going to allow people to have an opinon then what is the point of this compertition at all?
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KiddRiu
Ok,
I sadly disagree with his infraction and this comment.
Each user is allowed there own opinon on a signature. Not allowing him to have an opinon and infracting him for having opinon beats the whole point of having a public vote. Saying some ones signature is gay is not an attack on the user or disrespectful. Why it could have been put into better words such as "Number 5 sucks" the point is the same.
The infraction seems to be serious overkill with no actuall point.
If your not going to allow people to have an opinon then what is the point of this compertition at all?
In my opinion if someone is going to comment about a sign, the comment should be constructive.. Otherwise its a useless post.
i don't call "5th sign is gay" this a comment at all, its like saying the sign basically sucks and end of story.
Personally i think a new rule should be added to prevent this kind of posts
+ Post in the voting thread only to wish Good luck to the participants.
or just start the thread and after doing that, close it immediately!
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Scratch.
In my opinion if someone is going to comment about a sign, the comment should be constructive.. Otherwise its a useless post.
i don't call "5th sign is gay" this a comment at all, its like saying the sign basically sucks and end of story.
Personally i think a new rule should be added to prevent this kind of posts
+ Post in the voting thread only to wish Good luck to the participants.
or just start the thread and after doing that, close it immediately!
Closing the thread just means others are neglected for the mistake of the few. That is not a way for a community to go.
Also why I agree his attitude leaves a bitter taste his actions do not violate the community or section rules. He has not made a direct attack on a person he has only given his opinon. Remember he does not know who number 5 is so there is no way you can call it a personal attack.
In the end it is simple,
Why the user is being abit of a retarded moron he has not actually violated any rules. This means he should not have been infracted. Rules are there for a reason if staff decide to just make them up as they go along then rules mean nothing. Remember also that if this case leads to an infraction you are pretty much saying ---
"I dont really like it" is also worth an infraction as why the other is less polite they are the same comment.
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
The 4th seems to be the best, imo.
All the others seem to have been raped with effects, and no real effort was put into it.
I really like the depth in the 4th. All of them need allot of work, imo. I like #3 ,too, the text seems fun.
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
It's just me or the #4 entry is not showing anymore?
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
@scratch. wont give you anything, because in the end, that's my OWN opinion.
sorry if i insulted someone.
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Scratch.
It's just me or the #4 entry is not showing anymore?
I think it's just you.
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ezpzzz
@scratch. wont give you anything, because in the end, that's my OWN opinion.
sorry if i insulted someone.
you don't really fit the job of a gfx mod since your comments are like "entry #5 is gay"
and i didn't ask you anything, you just want to get some attention. enufsaid
@topic
now i can see it the #4 entry. dunno why i couldn't
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Scratch.
you don't really fit the job of a gfx mod since your comments are like "entry #5 is gay"
and i didn't ask you anything, you just want to get some attention. enufsaid
@topic
now i can see it the #4 entry. dunno why i couldn't
Mod application where?
Also Chewbecca is currently the mod and mental has already stated this section does not need another moderator currently.[I applied a while back and well I think im more suited as a mod in gfx than becca] So if I cant get a position as moderator it is unlikely he ever will.
It was loading slow before,
It is possible one of the servers on the host was being updated or went down.
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KiddRiu
Mod application where?
Also Chewbecca is currently the mod and mental has already stated this section does not need another moderator currently.[I applied a while back and well I think im more suited as a mod in gfx than becca] So if I cant get a position as moderator it is unlikely he ever will.
It was loading slow before,
It is possible one of the servers on the host was being updated or went down.
ezpzzz = Zeaos
I dont know if you knew Zeaos but he was a mod of this section.
tbh and imo he failed at the job but i cant say he is bad at gfx.
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Scratch.
ezpzzz = Zeaos
I dont know if you knew Zeaos but he was a mod of this section.
tbh and imo he failed at the job but i cant say he is bad at gfx.
Yes I do remember Zeaos he is another person I had issues with.
He started alot of crap with me in this community but it still does not mean the infraction is right. But then again I guess he is avoiding a ban by creating a new account so mental could just ban him instantly for that alone.
I still remember when AzizNatour tried to say he would sue me for a maplestory website I created. The funny thing was it was a modification of a website I had created more than a year before he even started doing gfx. Ofcourse like the issue with Zeason I won hands down :ott1:
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
i like the 3rd idk why but the tree one just caught my eye more
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
I really like #1, and #5.
My vote went to #1.
Great job this time around, guys! :thumbup1:
Re: GOTW 1.1 Voting (two)
Voted for the 3rd one, simply because i like the nature :p