It looks sort of plain...
Too small
Make it longer.
233px
98% of sigs are made with stocks, no need to pronounce that its a stock sig.
I don't know where you got that statistic, but I'm pretty sure you're wronnnnng.
I hardly ever use a stock.Originally Posted by iLuv Scott
40% maybe.
Sig nature is way to small i can just about make out the flow.
the displacement in the centre of the canvas is out of place and distracting.
Over-exaggeration.
Hyperbole. The flow is like a large U.
Looooong overdue thank you to the comments and the original looks much bigger o.o.
It seems much smaller on another comp though. weird.
epic failure.
Err, you didn't have to bump it. :(
I was looking forward to a "new" sig by you.
But, to find out that this was made 2 months ago, disappointed me.
erm
the size is pretty much killing it,
looks good,
would look better bigger
Awe my bad.
Im getting my comp shipped from oregon to SD in about 2 weeks so ill be able to start my graphicing then. Im pretty sure ill be quite rusty though.
hehe lawl, wel he might be right about that 98 percent uses stocks, if you also count fx stocks and such... ;) but as normal stocks I dont think they are used even close to that percentage, but it looks nice, but a bit to small imo... only thing I would like to say is try and use a bigger canvas... wider I mean... hight is good.. but gj still, kiu
Reply With Quote