For SOTW on another forum
Lost allot of its quality :(
Well people Hated it soo here a remastered version.
For SOTW on another forum
Lost allot of its quality :(
Well people Hated it soo here a remastered version.
Last edited by alexdesire; 14-10-08 at 11:22 PM.
Wtf?
I was checking the date to be sure,
but yeah... I'm not gonna rate this.
A render with a C4D. Thats all.
I lol'd a C4D pmsl.
Um yeah.
Its just a c4d with a render in the middle of it.
Not really worth rating.
+1 Grasna
+1 Genryu
It's amazing how some can be tricked by this simple trick.
Ah well you guys no what your on about.
You used c4d's as a background, putted a render - then again putted the same c4d to "blend" it.
It is pretty nice thought :)
Xriss is the winner!
Yeah man what i did :P
But seriously you can make a newbie go like:
OMG MAN WTF HOW U DO THAT, THATS INSANE WTF!!
WRITE A TUT PLEASE CMON EXPLAIN !!!!!!1111one
I gotta write another tut soon so ill probably do this one soo :P
Haha, it would be like 5 steps.
1. Make a canvas.
2. Put some c4d's to fill the bg.
3. But you render in the middle.
4. Put some c4d's to "blend" the render.
5. Add a font and a border = Your done.
There a few more steps like Gradient maps and Bluing but yeah ^_^
exactly why we said not to do so many sigs... the more you do, the less creativity you have and the quality of your work drops.... i don't like this one at all, render lacks blending, text is badly positioned + colors could be different, no light source, lacks some depth and proper focal
Not really a lack of creativity utilizing 1 C4D to its best.
But i really like this one ^_^
Nice, i like how the C4D's flow in the first sig.
SEX!
2nd one pwns imo.
<3
Thanks ^^
I like the second one allot ^^
Give the guy a break, hes hungry to make sigs, he's good so how come you guys turn that into a bad thing? xriss your posts added nothing to this thread. So what you know the steps of how he made it, yours like the same way made and you use it. There are more ways to rate a signature then by the way it's made.
Damn, i like the 2nd one allot, love the bg, the effects the text and looks like his floating from the light. Lol, 10/10 :)
I like the color's and what knot,
Not bad text either matches all,
9/10 :)
I guess your right, CrownC. It's still a signature ..Originally Posted by CrownC
Remastered version is "sex on a canvas, tbh".
Even though it IS a signature technically, it does not take 'skill' to move a c4d around then delete some of the render to make it blend in.
So thus 1/10 for at least doing something. :).
As for rating it for more then how its made well.....rating a signature IS based ALOT on how its made.
The depth, the lighting, etc etc.
so 10/10 for the guy who made the c4d ;).
And the first one has got plenty of depth and good lighting :/
That's what I'm basicly saying. The guys only rate it on how he basicly made it and for what they know but that's not how you rate a signature. As for the rest what you said you can't rate it 1/10 if your judging on the lighting and depth.
