Took some time on playing with lights :D .
Took some time on playing with lights :D .
very nice, maybe some render>lens flare placed for eyes, just a suggestion although its fine as it is. 9/10
impressive, only missing thing is a (tech)border
edit : now i see the border, dont ask whats wrong with me..
Not much u did
u copied it's stomach and used it as BG, and put text "WARLOCK" with Motion blur. k..
2/10
btw, lights? they are all on the BG
lol judging from Imortals pic it looks like u just the face in the middle than u inseted the body on the sides with text
First i decide to give a 9/10 for the signature, but after i have seen that you just copied it. i decide to give you a 2/10.
i agree with ImortaL.
Just change the font. :p
Huh, this forum hates me :D .
Once again i must to prove that its not what ya think.
First of all im seeing this picture first time.I was using a render.Here it is:No ligts and BACKGROUNDS!!!!!Only few flames
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/5...lock6fl6qz.png
Second, Using same render for a bg is a STYLE, something like abstract but better.Its not as noobish as using not ur own made brushes!!!
No ligts and etc right?Thats how it looks only with using render without lights:
And third.Guys like Immortal and HackQ should learn to rate signatures , not job.
Even if i find a way to do same signature with less work, it will still be good becouse it looks good.So another time please think before rating :D (Sry for my broken english)
no, rating a sig isnt about how it looks, although it would be nice if it looked good aswell as skilfull, i judge other people on there ammount of effort and talent they used in creating the sig, not the actuall outcome as a whole.
Most ppl use sig not to show how much they worked,but to put something beautifull to thei signature.Sometimes more work makes outcome look worse than simple.
its about talent not beauty... we come here to judge a person by there talents and efforts, and also if it does turn out good its a bonus.
And third.Guys like Immortal and HackQ should learn to rate signatures , not job.
Even if i find a way to do same signature with less work, it will still be good becouse it looks good.So another time please think before rating :D (Sry for my broken english)
So, tell me then. in what you made. what is SKILL in it, and what's beeing creative with it? It's not your signature thats beutiful or skilled, it's the one that painted it thats skilled, you copied it, took some of its body as background, burned around abit and put dodge\burn around his spikes so the fire doesent look so fierce. And, now youre judging MY judgement? You asked for yours, i didn't. I judge after how its made, not how it looks. and u didnt do alot on it, that's why im judging you low. Making something out of nothing is skill, beeing creative, making something that looks aweful in to something awsome. This signature isn't skill.
So. Stop judging my judgement, cause i never asked for it.
the skill is that he saw a way to make the render work as a signature.
lol.... if i only see that you just copied it and just added some little changes, that doesnt mean you deserved a 9 or something.Originally Posted by Alvyx
I think you didnt deserved it to get a high rated number for it.
Its my choise. DOT
Nice...
i see what you're saying, but i hope u understand my point here. Making this: :ohmy:
to a signature that's good looking is skill, cause youre creative. But he did a 3 step signature and gets pissed of when peopel say it's not much to judge.
i see your point but some credit still needs to be given for the fact that he saw a good looking signature in amongst it. its called having a good eye and it still needs to be recognized.
Given this you have the right too point out how its not had much done to it, but thats no need to be derogratary and start a flame war over it.
AMEN!
nice and beautiful so much.
it looks cool ^^
