MU CheckSum Generator v1.0.0.120 @ BoR Team
Developed by S@nek[BoR]
-
-
-# Name of: MU CheckSum Generator
# Version: 1.0.0.120
# Developed by: S@nek[BoR]
# Created date: 02.01.2011
# Last Update: 02.01.2011
# License: Free
# Language: English
# Operating System: Windows NT, XP, 2003, Vista, 2008
# Programming language: C#;
- Need: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0;
# Description: Program to generate the file "checksum.dat" on file "main.exe". Thanks "Deathway" for the initial algorithm.
-
Last edited by KarLi; 02-01-11 at 11:15 PM. Reason: New version
Approved
i never understood what is main checksum ..
can someone explain please ?
its a string of code main sends to gameserver and if it's wrong the client will be disconnected. this way you can prevent unwanted edits to main.exe
# Test results for 2-core: (Notebook)
# Test results for 4-core: (PC)File 'MyMain.exe' is selected. (Size: 5,462 MByte)
The program uses '2' logical processors.
BoR v1.0.0.80: ~8,731 sec;
P4F v0.2: ~23 sec;
Deathway: ~16 sec;
# Stand:
Processor: Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo P7350;
Memory: 2x2048 MByte DDR2-800 CL-6;
File 'MyMain.exe' is selected. (Size: 5,462 MByte)
The program uses '4' logical processors.
BoR v1.0.0.80: ~7.713 sec;
P4F v0.2: ~57 sec;
Deathway: ~28 sec;
# Stand:
Processor: AMD Phenom II X4 945;
Memory: Team 2x2048 MByte DDR3-1600 CL-7;
# Download archive: BoR, P4F, Deathway and 2 main.exe
P.S. -> Waiting for comments and suggestions.
Hello serves to cualkier version of main bone I have a main 1.03.25w see. JPM. would serve me well.
I released same months ago... just without a GUI: http://forum.ragezone.com/f197/multi...erator-662748/
I cant load it with Reflector, do you have anything to hide? Jotti Virusscan finds "Gen:Trojan.Heur.RP.3y0aaiwTJ9k"
good work bro
will this also
work on season 6 ?
I have optimized and reworked the algorithm.Originally Posted by spezi
- And my program is based on an algorithm Deathway.
P.S. -> Program is protected with WinLicense v2.1.6.0 =)
Last edited by MuForum.Info; 03-01-11 at 09:51 AM.
I`we asked same question why pack with Winlicense if everybody knows algo of calculation and there is many many open source project like this..
i got paranoi to :D if packed app like this = something hide
who cares if your algorithm finishes in 2,7 instead of 2,9 seconds after optimizing? Using such protection is really a bad sign ;)
there is also additional information such a like: u need start programm then restart it and only then u got performance around 10-20ms better.. shore if we dont count time we wasted on restarting app.. xDDDDDDDDDDDdd
Yeah, but your app runs over a framework (.NET), so at the end, your optimization means less then nothing...
When I see one ASM coded generator or even in C++, than I will show my respect.
And... what about the protection ? The calculation algo is not a secreat at all !
Well, the first time publish their source code.
Code:byte[] lpFileBuffer = null; // ---- using (FileStream fs = new FileStream(FilePath, FileMode.Open)) { lpFileBuffer = new byte[fs.Length]; // ---- fs.Read(lpFileBuffer, 0, lpFileBuffer.Length); } // ---- int iCoresCount = Environment.ProcessorCount; // ---- uint uSize = (uint)lpFileBuffer.Length; // ---- uint dwMaskLength = (uint)(uSize / 4); int iMaskLength = (int)(uSize / 4); // ---- g_Config.Mask = new uint[dwMaskLength]; // ---- Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch(); sw.Start(); // ---- ParallelOptions po = new ParallelOptions(); // ---- po.MaxDegreeOfParallelism = Environment.ProcessorCount; // ---- Parallel.For(0, iMaskLength, po, i => { g_Config.Mask[i] = BitConverter.ToUInt32(lpFileBuffer, i * 4); }); // ---- Parallel.For(0, 1024, po, (i, loopState) => { if (g_Config.bShouldStop == false) { g_Config.csf.Checksums[i] = GetChecksum(lpFileBuffer, g_Config.Mask, dwMaskLength, (ushort)i); } else { loopState.Stop(); } }); // ---- sw.Stop(); // ---- public uint GetChecksum(byte[] lpFileBuffer, uint[] Mask, uint dwMaskLength, ushort wChecksumKey) { uint dwResult = (uint)(wChecksumKey << 9); // ---- uint dwKey = 0; // ---- for (uint i = 0, j = 0; i < dwMaskLength; i++, j += 4) { dwKey = Mask[i]; // ---- switch (((j >> 2) + wChecksumKey) % 3) { case 0: { dwResult ^= dwKey; } break; case 1: { dwResult += dwKey; } break; case 2: { dwResult = (dwResult << (int)(dwKey % 11)) ^ dwKey; } break; default: break; } // ---- dwResult ^= ((wChecksumKey + dwResult) >> (int)(((j >> 2) % 16) + 3)); } // ---- return dwResult; }
g_Config.csf.Checksums[i]
no credits for me? ^^
Yes, Spezi :) he made this Checksum generator after i showed your sources him - in next day xD
I have no doubts about your sources usage in this programm just dont wanned flame (copy/paste and rewrite small shit) Deathway style!
i Released delphi multicore checksum generator and left sources link of your C# OpneSource multicore checksum generator ^^
Shore in other forum :)
---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:52 AM ----------
Im sorry, but looks guys like all you got a bit crazy on ASMTheze days modern compilator can do fucking magic and mather of fact asm is needed only to optimize code
u can write all shit in any High lang and if need if u ficking care about 10-20ms u can optimize your code with inline asm
Have FUN! :)
Last edited by mauka; 17-01-11 at 12:56 PM.
I see you stupid kid forgot that when you chew snot, then Deathway published sources long ago ...
So you can stuff yourself at one place their pride and opinion ...
Download sources of Deathway 2007 year...;
Temper, Temper Mr.Forum.Info! U cut from all context one or two words and atack!
wooot.. and most important part u skipped so selfish and so disrespectfull to all other coders, shame!
anyone has mirror link for that great checksum generator?
Reply With Quote![MU CheckSum Generator (c) S@nek[BoR]](http://ragezone.com/hyper728.png)
