/find command [1.5]

I think everyone here is well aware of all you work and recent releases and respect you for that, but your attitude isn't good. If someone give tips based on the code you posted, even if it is useless for you, it can be useful for someone who wishes to use the code and also can learn with that.
Also I have to say that write bad code isn't bad if you have people to give you tips and make you improve your skills. In some circumstances everyone can write bad code because noone knows everything or writes perfect code, I can say this for myself, but is your attitude what makes it a good or bad thing.
I like the concept behind the following phrase:
Junior engineers solve simple problems in a complex way, Master engineers solve complex problems in a simple way.
Even being the 'Junior' or 'Master' doesn't mean you're bad, mean you're leaning and I'm not ashamed of learning.

That said, I hope you take this thread in a good way and keep with your releases.

just cuz 1 guy said my attitude was bad, now everyone is being "albert einstein", people stop this i didn't be any arrogant or any ignorance, you are the ones who r like this !!! all i said was i want to do this the way i want, you can't force me.
it's NOT a "MUST" issue, it's a "SHOULD" issue...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tannous

just cuz 1 guy said my attitude was bad, now everyone is being "albert einstein", people stop this i didn't be any arrogant or any ignorance, you are the ones who r like this !!! all i said was i want to do this the way i want, you can't force me.
it's NOT a "MUST" issue, it's a "SHOULD" issue...

---

People are merely trying to help you, yet you're too dense to see that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheCosmos

People are merely trying to help you, yet you're too dense to see that.

---

Okay, let's kick this off, with i'm sorry, want me to admit (by forcing) that i have a bad attitude, you got that sir.
now help me, advise me. i'm doing whatever you say :/
if a shit stupid code i posted will make me an enemy to everyone, and get me hated by everyone, then FUCK IT.
I prefer to have friends here and good relations with the members, upon this shit code !
so sorry if you think i was so arrogant that i didn' accept an advise :):

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NOPCODE

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/tg/imag...1715132190.jpg

Anyway, the whole idea at first wasn't to poke fun at him, it was to point things out that he should do to improve his releases. It's all fine and dandy for him to say "if you want secure code, then secure it yourself" but the fact of the matter is that if someone knew how to make his code better then they would be capable of writing it themselves. Yes, he's done some things that a lot of people wouldn't do, and it's obvious that he's new to programming, but people are giving him advice and he's just brushing it off and making excuses rather than actually taking peoples suggestions into consideration. There are many ways of doing things and nobody knows everything; so people should always be open to help and advice from others; even seasoned programmers make mistakes.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheCosmos

Keep in mind that there's a difference between "ego" and constructive criticism. In this case:
1) Allocating too much memory for a static-sized string.
2) Using sprintf for a static string
3) Usage could be printed automatically by following Killer1478's suggestion
4) Casting a const char* to a char* and then casting it back to a const char*
His entire function could literally be done like this

Code:

---

void ChatCmd_FindPlayer(const char* line,const int argc, char **const argv)
{
    ZPostWhere(argv[1]);
}

---

---

Don't get me wrong, I agree with both of you. But you'll also have to agree with me on the fact that the average attitude on this forum is awful and that does not exclude this thread.

I admit that the code OP posted is wrong and so was his reaction to the constructive criticism that was posted. But whoever posted the constructive criticism made the very same mistake and didn't respond properly either. If someone doesn't want to take your critisim then you just leave him be and he'll never, ever take a step forward in programming. That's his problem and not yours. You should definitely not keep pushing your arguments as it's a waste of time and only provokes this kind of fights. That's why I told all of them to keep the ego's down, OP for not being able to handle criticism and whoever posted criticism for not accepting that OP can't handle it and therefore feeling the need to push their criticism.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sahar01238

;( so u can help me in [G] plz ? http://forum.ragezone.com/f245/low-gravity-tag-838077/

---

but no one will help you without knowing the errors you got :D .. post them !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sahar01238

okey :) 1 second

- - - Updated - - -

c:\Users\Sahar\Desktop\Source\Source_Code\Stable\Gunz\ZModule_Movable.cpp(198): error C2084: function 'void ZModule_Movable::UpdateGravity(float)' already has a body
c:\Users\Sahar\Desktop\Source\Source_Code\Stable\Gunz\ZGameClient.cpp(765): error C2084: function 'void ZGameClient::OnStageEnterBattle(const MUID &,MCmdEnterBattleParam)' already has a body

- - - Updated - - -

help plz ?

---

I think it means, that you added new functions, when it should be edited !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Solaire

Don't get me wrong, I agree with both of you. But you'll also have to agree with me on the fact that the average attitude on this forum is awful and that does not exclude this thread.

I admit that the code OP posted is wrong and so was his reaction to the constructive criticism that was posted. But whoever posted the constructive criticism made the very same mistake and didn't respond properly either. If someone doesn't want to take your critisim then you just leave him be and he'll never, ever take a step forward in programming. That's his problem and not yours. You should definitely not keep pushing your arguments as it's a waste of time and only provokes this kind of fights. That's why I told all of them to keep the ego's down, OP for not being able to handle criticism and whoever posted criticism for not accepting that OP can't handle it and therefore feeling the need to push their criticism.

---

Oh my, there still are sane people in this forum?

I have a feeling that there's a language barrier here keeping Tannous from understanding what people are trying to tell him completely. If that's not it, then I don't know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hakurah

Oh my, there still are sane people in this forum?

I have a feeling that there's a language barrier here keeping Tannous from understanding what people are trying to tell him completely. If that's not it, then I don't know.

---

With this comment, u even make the forum more ((un saned))..
Read the previous comments, you will understand that i've noticed my mistakes, hope you even look before talking, just don't try to fight people !

and the point of this is ?
char* TargetName = argv[1];
ZPostWhere(const_cast<char*>(TargetName));
nice type conversions(entirely not needed)
...
ZPostWhere(argv[1]);

and p.s saned is not a word

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by own_prox

and the point of this is ?
char* TargetName = argv[1];
ZPostWhere(const_cast<char*>(TargetName));
nice type conversions(entirely not needed)
...
ZPostWhere(argv[1]);

and p.s saned is not a word

---

You're one to talk. I could easily dig up 100+ posts of you speaking trash english, steven.

Tannous, update the first post with improved code, will you?

The const keyword in a function definition means that the parameter marked constant is guaranteed not to be changed (the compiler simply won't let you). That means that it takes a regular type as an argument and does not ever change it's value (which is entirely possible when you pass a pointer as they're not pass by value).

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/07x6b05d.aspx

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by own_prox

and the point of this is ?
char* TargetName = argv[1];
ZPostWhere(const_cast<char*>(TargetName));
nice type conversions(entirely not needed)
...
ZPostWhere(argv[1]);

and p.s saned is not a word

---

Grammar, programming.

Huh i got bored of replying, i'm on phone, i'll update post when i get back home...
It seems like updating the post will bring PEACE to the world

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Solaire

The const keyword in a function definition means that the parameter marked constant is guaranteed not to be changed (the compiler simply won't let you). That means that it takes a regular type as an argument and does not ever change it's value (which is entirely possible when you pass a pointer as they're not pass by value).

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/07x6b05d.aspx



Grammar, programming.

---

i was pointing out its entirely irrelevant, learn to read instead of trying to tell me what i already know mate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by own_prox

i was pointing out its entirely irrelevant, learn to read instead of trying to tell me what i already know mate.

---

I like adding as much as possible lines to my code, will if you don't mind :/ !!
anyway UPDATED