MatchAgent for July 21 2008 MatchServer

[GUNZ2830]

It is not tested for a long time. and suitable edit.
June 13 2007 MatchAgent based.
Thanks to :http://forum.ragezone.com/f245/worki...2008-a-633133/

[MentaL]

[wtfhacker]

Thanks.

[Linear88]

Thanks, will test.

EDIT: Works well, thanks a lot!

[Phoenix]

Thanks a lot man! I love your work! I'm looking forward to more of your runnables and Quest/Clan server!

[Number12]

A this is nice. Thanks.

[whhacker93]

Thanks, this may help me out.

keep it up.

[hotgame]

nice , Thanks.

[MicroManiacs]

You're doing nice. thx!

[kochon]

Thanks a million. You're a great contributor to this community, and I hope you get it back in whatever shape or form you wish :)

[katsumi]

now i dont get Agent error, but nat config set and 999 ping :(

[randy1234]

just wondering are you jacob?

[Rhake]

KillerStefan Server MatchServer include matchagent ? o.O'

[wtfhacker]

KillerStefan Server MatchServer include matchagent ? o.O'

Yeah but it's a fix to it.

[luisgustavomiki]

Thanks. ILY

[Phoenix]

just wondering are you jacob?

No. Of course not. Jacob is Theoretical.

KillerStefan Server MatchServer include matchagent ? o.O'

Yes, the 2008 MatchServer does have a built-in matchagent but it seems to be giving Agent Errors to players. So, using this would be the best option.

[Linear88]

the 2008 MatchServer does have a built-in matchagent

That was never true.

MatchAgent relays peers, and MatchServer communicates MatchAgent, therefore:

Client <-> MatchServer (Send Data/Receive Data) <-> MatchAgent (Request Relay Peer)

As MatchAgent was not present, Agent Error had occured. (NAT only happens when a player is behind a router).

The DBAgentIP fix was just for MatchServer to locate MatchAgent.

[KillerStefan]

I still don't have an answer to why I don't have a new MatchAgent from Oct 2007 to Oct 2008.
I'm also wondering why Gunz-Extreme, HeroGamers & EliteGunz had no problem with AE's.

[ThroneX]

Going to try this.. :P

[luke4live]

Thanks alot!

---------- Post added at 01:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:46 PM ----------

A this is nice. Thanks.

Then why did you did'nt Thank?

---------- Post added at 01:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:47 PM ----------

No. Of course not. Jacob is Theoretical.

Isn't it like this? :
Theoretical=Jacob=Phail
Why does he have so many accounts or who is Phail?.