Yes
No
They require less disk space, no overhead of say, the .NET framework, thus run faster than the alternative. What's not to like? The fact you see a command line window popup? The associated icon with the .bat extension?Originally Posted by Rotana
I don't understand your reasoning.
hmm as far as i remember this was coded in vb6, so it wont need .net framework.
Posted via Mobile Device
I'd take batch over vb6 any day
trolololo
btw, i made this ages ago, in the start days of the gunz pservers.
Posted via Mobile Device
Just breakin your balls man, it's a nice release I guess. just saying it can be done with a batch
I know,but i will post some more fancy things,if i can find them back.
I still must have things like an scenario editor, zitem editor, custom launcher, model viewer, ect
Posted via Mobile Device
I didn't look at your application, and VB6 still has a sizable runtime that has to load prior to your application loading, thus some considerable overhead still occurs.
And? That doesn't change anything, lol.
What's wrong with MatchKeeper?
error here:
you have to extract to somewhere (desktop would be the best place)error here:
Yup that should fix it.
Posted via Mobile Device
Same error here, even if it is extracted.
Help? :P
Lol Nice
Reply With Quote