My man <3
Oh, resharing it in case it gets deleted again: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17uD...ew?usp=sharing
Printable View
My man <3
Oh, resharing it in case it gets deleted again: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17uD...ew?usp=sharing
If someone doesn't have the client, they can download from torrent here are 2 versions for the 287 protocol
KR Client 2 VERSIONS G574+G573 torrent
https://mega.nz/file/iYBCWCYJ#IL3CiN...q5sFzCZUmM5HBE
Friends, can you share the authgated you use, why is it different from the results of our running? You have completed a lot of certification.Quote:
Originally Posted by renobizarro
- - - Updated - - -
@ blackpanther197 paserver Can my friend record an instructional video on how to set up and start this pa and put it on youtube
Pretty sure he's using the same AuthGateD what were're using but with an incorrect client, thats why it says Session id mismatch.Quote:
Originally Posted by kirayamatos
L2KR-P287-D20200608-G573 is the client which is able to log in, the other one is useless can can't even be patched properly to not use gg and actually connect to a specific ip.
- - - Updated - - -
Hey there! Where did you get the IBServer files?Quote:
Originally Posted by adastmin
BlackPanther, maybe, you need to configure the ODBC file
- - - Updated - - -
maybe, you need to configure the ODBC fileQuote:
Originally Posted by blackpanther197
need l2comm patched((( ida not search loc
Where did you get the IBserver files from? Since they are not part of the current leaks.Quote:
Originally Posted by adastmin
some confusion or doubts that I have: Client protocol 166 is Secret of Empire: Part 1 in Classic mode, and 166 in live is ¿Fafurion ? but and protocol ¿162 ? or maybe 152, is in classic ¿ [2.8] Saviors: Seven Signs ?Quote:
Originally Posted by irk
and protocol 287 is ¿ Tales Untold / Homunculus Ch. 2 ?
protocol 162 is korean Client Orfer and yes the Client 287 is korean Homunculus Ch. 2 NA EU =286Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ Falco
166 is Fafurion Secret of Empire: Part 1.. and part 2 aka 196 client started with auto hunting etc...
@blackpanther197
Share
- - - Updated - - -
tutorial
these are all Korean customers https://gyazo.com/2662ff349f76993ac909db8d7b2273a6 166 is the version of saviors in Russian localization and the euro taiwan is called differently, the engine there, too, the other will not work without changes for the original server.
everything works on original ncsoft files https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73uNkAhFyGki know that you are asking the client 162 166 but tell me what files you will give in return that will really be useful and i will
now installed live version from svn L2_LIVE_LSERVER - CLIENT166 - REVISION 24I didn’t change anything in the client, but I immediately changed the title of the game on login and added this item to character creation
https://gyazo.com/0e874f58d330780466a3be28293774e7
https://gyazo.com/e4b066ffcea1a1b37ebd81a8e3e7002f
Kamel and Ertea race was also opened
https://gyazo.com/15ff03b495e723d6736176c0de1ecd6a
Okay, so whatever i do, i always get a completely empty server list after logging in which never happened before with any other L2 server, so what is different in this build?
Yes the server is in the server table, but for some reason the client does not get a list of the available servers. Why?
reading this now i remember why most of us did quit, because people like you is not willing to work in a team for a common goal.Quote:
Originally Posted by irk
if we had the right client we could start translating and working on scripts and doing lot of stuff...
any way... new goal: finding korean clients.
Quote:
Originally Posted by renobizarro
But, i never even seen a server with the protocol 166 or 162 or whtaver, every single release from Fryye is for the 287 protocol, so why do we even bother with him?
Also i just wasted my entire day on making sure that pa server whatever shit is working to realize that it's not even helping anything, it's just an extra authentication layer between the client and the authD which can be easily bypassed by simply disabling paserver in the ini, so yet again, why even bother with that shit in the first place?
I honestly don't understand you guys...
yes, it's just an extra layer of security, i have tried many client protocols but had no luck.Quote:
Originally Posted by LORd_RiVE
i'll keep trying anyway.