Anti DDoS fix for phx 3.11.0

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    Ask me about Daoism FullmetalPride is offline
    MemberRank
    Nov 2010 Join Date
    2,172Posts

    Re: Anti DDoS fix for phx 3.11.0

    If your reverse proxy supports this header, simply add this to your client:

    PHP Code:
    $_SERVER["REMOTE_ADDR"] = $_SERVER["HTTP_X_REAL_IP"];

    mysql_query("UPDATE users SET ip_last = '" $_SERVER["REMOTE_ADDR"] . "' WHERE username = '" USER_ID "'");

    // If your CMS doesn't support USER_ID, find another identifier for that specific user. 

    I recommend you add that to your global.php.

    Warning: Be sure that you don't have $_SERVER["remote_addr"] set to another variable. In addition, if you use CloudFlare, this could turn up some problems, as the IP's will turn into CloudFlare's

    Quote Originally Posted by Luminia View Post
    Yeah, I'm very early with my answer. I know!

    To the question: "Who the hell uses Phoenix".

    Some Hotels use Phoenix, the reason for that is: Phoenix is stabil, and don't have a hundred of bugs how butterstorm, and the other shit.
    I think that's the most hilarious spelling of stable I've ever seen.

  2. #17
    Unknown Place MaxZeus is offline
    MemberRank
    Mar 2013 Join Date
    592Posts

    Re: Anti DDoS fix for phx 3.11.0

    This can be called as :

    "IP Based Socket Anti Flood", but not an Anti DDoS. :P

  3. #18
    Apprentice Crypt0nite is offline
    MemberRank
    Sep 2013 Join Date
    The NetherlandsLocation
    24Posts

    Re: Anti DDoS fix for phx 3.11.0

    Quote Originally Posted by MaxZeus View Post
    This can be called as :

    "IP Based Socket Anti Flood", but not an Anti DDoS. :P
    I agree. This doesn't solve DDoS-attacks.

  4. #19
    Valued Member Mush is offline
    MemberRank
    Oct 2012 Join Date
    NorwayLocation
    118Posts

    Re: Anti DDoS fix for phx 3.11.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Bow View Post
    This is the stupidest question.
    What kind of comment is it an ironic question?

  5. #20
    Apprentice Crypt0nite is offline
    MemberRank
    Sep 2013 Join Date
    The NetherlandsLocation
    24Posts

    Re: Anti DDoS fix for phx 3.11.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Mush View Post
    What kind of comment is it an ironic question?
    No. It's a stupid​ question.

  6. #21
    1 + 3 + 3 = 7 EvilCoder is offline
    MemberRank
    Jul 2009 Join Date
    /home/mvdworpLocation
    334Posts

    Re: Anti DDoS fix for phx 3.11.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Bozzie View Post
    Tell me about it, in my opinion R63B is just full of Bugs and what-not until a stable and bug-free version is released, i'm pretty sure a-lot of Hotels uses Phoenix, skids.
    Phoenix is a bunch of shit, gets to much CPU and doesn't use any cache.

    Quote Originally Posted by Crypt0nite View Post
    I agree. This doesn't solve DDoS-attacks.
    To support your comment, you can't solve ddos attacks.

    You can simply build fail-overs or stronger connections OR some other tricks, but the impact will still affect services.

  7. #22
    Apprentice Crypt0nite is offline
    MemberRank
    Sep 2013 Join Date
    The NetherlandsLocation
    24Posts

    Re: Anti DDoS fix for phx 3.11.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Mister. M View Post
    Phoenix is a bunch of shit, gets to much CPU and doesn't use any cache.



    To support your comment, you can't solve ddos attacks.

    You can simply build fail-overs or stronger connections OR some other tricks, but the impact will still affect services.
    To sum up your post, proxy's are useless either.

    If a kid wants to put the service offline, they could DDoS the proxy. DDoS-attacks are so strong these days.

  8. #23
    1 + 3 + 3 = 7 EvilCoder is offline
    MemberRank
    Jul 2009 Join Date
    /home/mvdworpLocation
    334Posts

    Re: Anti DDoS fix for phx 3.11.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Luminia View Post
    Yeah, I'm very early with my answer. I know!

    To the question: "Who the hell uses Phoenix".

    Some Hotels use Phoenix, the reason for that is: Phoenix is stabil, and don't have a hundred of bugs how butterstorm, and the other shit. Okay the client will loos great with a r63b emulator but phoenix is much better. So don't aks who uses phoenix. Better ask, who the fuck use the buggy butterstorm shit?
    # REMOVE THIS POST PLEASE. Comment to old thread. Sorry!



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Advertisement