Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zak©
It will be eventually once one of the insider snitches email Sulake.
I bet sulake lurk this section too...
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustik
I remember when Josh called Dom a spy xD
Anyway this is disgustingly manual.
A spy? Please, i'm better than that! :)
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
I don't understand a single bit of this thread.
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
It's nice, but we need all packet id changer :) I need Butterstorm updated ids :)
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
In really, if you made all packets, you can save alot of times. Without made one by one, will made automactly for you. And generate the code.
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
Quote:
Originally Posted by
W00dL3cs
Honestly, this is the most stupid way I've ever seen to update messages, and still requires MANY manual operations. If a single line is added or removed, all the process will be fucked up o.o
Yes, but at least I share something and you only show things to look cool.
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
Quote:
Originally Posted by
W00dL3cs
I have no interests in looking cool.
Just wanted to show you how little cool you are.
Always better to release nothing, than actually release a bunch of sh*t.
Sorry to show you the crude truth.
So you better wish no emulators? Because I think they're all shit (unfinished, unstable, non updated etc..)
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
Quote:
Originally Posted by
W00dL3cs
Yes, it's better not to have emulators, instead of having dozens copy/pasted ones. I would have released my tool weeks ago, if only the people who attempt this section had deserved it.
And yes, it's real.
And yes, it works.
And yes, someone already has its source code: one of the few people here on Rage who I really wanted to give it to :P
Yeah, i can vouch for Alex's tool.
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MrMime
So you better wish no emulators? Because I think they're all shit (unfinished, unstable, non updated etc..)
Oh please, you release shit emulators all the time. The releases you make fit that criteria you listed exactly!
- Unfinished
- Unstable
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Quackster
Oh please, you release shit emulators all the time. The releases you make fit that criteria you listed exactly!
- Unfinished
- Unstable
Thats a Lie, Quackster. He is very good in what hes done. We doing alot of things, emulator stable, etc. Btw, I dont see anything from you, since Sierra. I think we posting more, will help more people. We think that. Ok, the program is Unfinished, but, we do a base. No one posts that since when we post. So, we deserve a credit for that.
Re: Auto Packet Header Updater - BST (Boycot Sulake Today)q
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Droppy
Thats a Lie
No it's not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Droppy
He is very good in what hes done.
No, he isn't actually.
Also this doesn't concern you, but now since you quoted me I guess it does -.-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Droppy
Btw, I dont see anything from you
Quite frankly. This is because what I release is always unique and I don't rush my work. Bases/framework are all the same in terms with Josh.