Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Valued Member djtroy39 is offline
    MemberRank
    Aug 2012 Join Date
    United StatesLocation
    119Posts

    Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    Hello. Recently I've made a tool to split Packets from the last swf (NOT to decode them)

    For example, you will get this:

    [0][0][0][10][11]Ç[0][0][0][2][0][0][0][0][0][0][0][6][8]P[0][0][0][2]

    Insert it into the program (upper textbox)

    Output in lower textbox:

    [0][0][0][10][11]Ç[0][0][0][2][0][0][0][0]

    [0][0][0][6][8]P[0][0][0][2]


    Makes it easier to read packets.

    Credits:
    - ItachiKM/Whoeverelseitwas - Finding out the decoding (DecodeInt32)
    - Maarten (vista4life) - Giving me the idea of making the tool
    - Me - Writing the tool

    NOTE: This tool requires .NET Framework 4.5!!

    Virus scan + picture



    Download:
    Ferri Packetter.rar

    For whoever wanna improve: it's open source!
    Oh yeah, please like + rep if you like :) ^^
    Last edited by djtroy39; 01-10-12 at 04:41 PM.


  2. #2
    Zephyr Studios PRIZM is offline
    MemberRank
    Feb 2012 Join Date
    DenmarkLocation
    2,291Posts

    Re: Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    Great, Troy.

  3. #3
    Alpha Member Zak© is offline
    MemberRank
    Oct 2007 Join Date
    2,693Posts

    Re: Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    Nice i guess, but there's no reason to write it in .NET 4.5, should have done it in 3.0 for better support, as it just splits bytes.

  4. #4
    Valued Member djtroy39 is offline
    MemberRank
    Aug 2012 Join Date
    United StatesLocation
    119Posts

    Re: Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    Quote Originally Posted by Zak© View Post
    Nice i guess, but there's no reason to write it in .NET 4.5, should have done it in 3.0 for better support, as it just splits bytes.
    I work always in Visual Studios 2012, and the framework is 4.5 as default, forgot to change.
    I didn't choose 4.5 by myself.

  5. #5
    Member Reimu is offline
    MemberRank
    Aug 2012 Join Date
    62Posts

    Re: Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    Thanks for the release, George. Although you clearly didn't think much about cross-compatibility with this.

  6. #6
    Valued Member BurakAdama is offline
    MemberRank
    Jul 2012 Join Date
    142Posts

    Re: Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    Thanks for this release !

  7. #7
    Member Biblioteca13 is offline
    MemberRank
    Sep 2012 Join Date
    91Posts

    Re: Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    I don't use packet stuff , but you made something nice that will help some people

    (Don't forget to make a VirusTotal analyse and post the link , because there will be always someone asking , and a screenie)

  8. #8
    Valued Member djtroy39 is offline
    MemberRank
    Aug 2012 Join Date
    United StatesLocation
    119Posts

    Re: Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    Quote Originally Posted by Biblioteca13 View Post
    I don't use packet stuff , but you made something nice that will help some people

    (Don't forget to make a VirusTotal analyse and post the link , because there will be always someone asking , and a screenie)
    Well, I was kinda lazy xd but I will post it:



  9. #9
    Developer Quackster is offline
    DeveloperRank
    Dec 2010 Join Date
    AustraliaLocation
    3,484Posts

    Re: Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    A little HxD can change the .NET framework.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  10. #10
    Alpha Member Moogly is offline
    MemberRank
    Feb 2008 Join Date
    Pool LidoLocation
    2,322Posts

    Re: Ferri Packetter [Packet Splitter for the Post-Shuffle Packets]

    Quote Originally Posted by Zak© View Post
    Nice i guess, but there's no reason to write it in .NET 4.5, should have done it in 3.0 for better support, as it just splits bytes.
    Why are we bitching about .NET versions, people should keep up to date with the newer versions regardless of features used in their software.



Advertisement