OSRose Dev Revisions

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Novice bobhobo is offline
    MemberRank
    Nov 2008 Join Date
    3Posts

    OSRose Dev Revisions

    These are NOT SUPPORTED by the OSRose staff, do NOT post on their forums asking about them.
    This is also not supported by me, you should only use these if you know what the fuck you're doing. These are the latest, and completely unstable, OSRose dev revisions. I'll update the SVN as long as I can get my hands on the latest revisions from OSRose.

    http://subversion.assembla.com/svn/osrose-dev/trunk/

    Remember, do NOT post asking how to use this, it is for those people who know what the fuck they're doing, and will be able to use the source changes with their current servers, or believe they can sort out how to use this version themselves. It does not come with binaries for this reason, if you can't compile it yourself, you shouldn't use it. And remember, this is NOT supported by the OSRose forums, the devs, admins, and mods there have nothing to do with me releasing this. The only thing you will accomplish by posting there is that I'll most likely lose my source for getting the latest revision, and you will lose the ability to have access to what should be a free and open project. Enjoy.


  2. #2
    Account Upgraded | Title Enabled! MDFK is offline
    MemberRank
    Sep 2006 Join Date
    EnglandLocation
    973Posts

    Re: OSRose Dev Revisions

    first you dont need to swear... at can you at least specify whats added form the orginal team?

  3. #3
    Novice bobhobo is offline
    MemberRank
    Nov 2008 Join Date
    3Posts

    Re: OSRose Dev Revisions

    I know the userbase here, and yes, I do need to swear. If a mod thinks it's out of line, they'll remove it, but I highly doubt the mod will.
    There are 253 revisions since "Rev 80", there's no way in hell I'm putting a changelog for the entire thing. If you want to know what's added, there is a public list of revisions on the OSRose forums you can read. It's up-to-date-ish
    http://forum.dev-osrose.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1347

  4. #4
    Account Upgraded | Title Enabled! lmame is offline
    MemberRank
    Jun 2007 Join Date
    441Posts

    Re: OSRose Dev Revisions

    I wonder who is the guy, too ashamed of himself, who is behind this :)
    Why if you're so sure doing a good thing, did you make a new user to post this?

    Btw, this one is one of the most buggy ever .
    I will ban each people asking me for help on msn, or in forum.
    Blame whoever this guy is and who hasn't the balls to give his name :)

  5. #5
    Account Upgraded | Title Enabled! rl2171 is offline
    MemberRank
    Aug 2006 Join Date
    USALocation
    659Posts

    Re: OSRose Dev Revisions

    Wow, I would not have thought of them to release the buggy version of the dev osrose. The person must be a dev and one who must refuse to work on the project, which is too bad.

    Here it starts again and I am sorry to see this happen.

    Icon, I hope this can be deleted from the forum as well, the dev version is at the moment private until it is ready to release and debugged. Once it is ready (doesnt matter if it is a year after), then it will be publically released for everyone.

  6. #6
    Apprentice Drakia is offline
    MemberRank
    Aug 2006 Join Date
    18Posts

    Re: OSRose Dev Revisions

    Haha, someone beat me to it. I was planning on doing this eventually.
    lmame, why are you bitching that someone released your precious OPEN SOURCE source code? I mean, come on, people bug you on MSN, block them. People ask on the forums, tell them it's not supported. It's not like it's _that_ hard to stop people from bugging you about it.

    I personally hope ICON let's this stay up, open source should indeed be open source. Good job bobhobo :)

  7. #7
    Novice bobhobo is offline
    MemberRank
    Nov 2008 Join Date
    3Posts

    Re: OSRose Dev Revisions

    Alright, my sources lost access to SVN, so I won't be able to update anymore. Blame the fucktards who ignored my warnings and went to lmame for help.
    lmame, why do you assume this is a new name, and not one I've always used?
    rl2171, yes it is a buggy version, because I upload every version I get my hands on, whether it is stable or not, that is how things should have been from the beginning.
    Drakia is right, it's easy to block people, or just ignore them. There's no need to get all pissy about it.

  8. #8
    Account Upgraded | Title Enabled! lmame is offline
    MemberRank
    Jun 2007 Join Date
    441Posts

    Re: OSRose Dev Revisions

    Whatever you say love. (was for Drakia).

    @bob:
    You're not in my shoes, I'm not the "cold blood noob killer" Drakia the "open source" white knight is.
    As for the rest, those are your first messages and it's about this.
    I can see too you didn't answer my PM.
    Thanks to you, everyone will have to wait for the public release as the dev rev is now... CLOSED...

  9. #9
    Account Upgraded | Title Enabled! lmame is offline
    MemberRank
    Jun 2007 Join Date
    441Posts

    Re: OSRose Dev Revisions

    Having the svn alone is meaningless. As I explained in the osrose's forum, you need to have access to a "test" forum to give the bugs and also to msn to know what has been added and what is beeing tested.
    A lot of stuff changes from a rev to another as it's a dev rev, it's not meant to be stable.

    Now enough on the subject, I'll play union in osRose as I just finished to code it, and sorry, your "source" will never access it.



Advertisement