I guess "The Bing Bang Theory" show begins like that too. :o
Printable View
badly coded albeit done on purpose. work on your coding. also mertjuh you fail
this thread is hilarious and mertjuh needs some cock up his ass
You are sadly deceived by your opinions and therefore it is best not to respond to your instincts, and rather to what the general community thinks as a whole.
You want bumps? You got bumps.
You want an essay? You got essay.
You want flames? You got them already.
You want fail? You can have fail.
You want cock? Sorry, but no one will give you.
If ever I had a tough letter to write, this is it. My challenge is to convince you that Mr. Mertjuh's ideas are biggety, poisonous to young minds, and disrespectful to Western values and achievements. By way of introduction, let me just say that Mertjuh is extremely ophidian. In fact, my handy-dandy Ophidian-O-Meter confirms that Mertjuh regards himself as both omniscient and omnicompetent, fully qualified to put any intellectual discipline in the world in its place. And here, I insist, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in Mertjuh's memoranda. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that whenever there's an argument about his devotion to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that his smear tactics are incompatible with the proclivities of instrumental reason. That should settle the argument pretty quickly.
You may not believe me when I say that Mertjuh's belief systems are attributable to an ignorance born of fear, but the facts are plain and abundant for anyone with the eyes to see and the intelligence to discern fact from fancy. If Mertjuh were to get his hands on the levers of power he'd immediately divert our attention from serious issues. If you don't believe me then consider that I don't see how he can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that if Mertjuh can one day destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world then the long descent into night is sure to follow. Mertjuh wants to create a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason—a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture. Who does he think he is? I mean, he can get away with lies (e.g., that his précis are all sweetness and light) because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Mertjuh is lying.
It is deeply unfortunate that I consider Mertjuh's homilies antithetical to my principles as a person concerned for the good of all, because Mertjuh says it is within his legal right to eviscerate freedom of speech and sexual privacy rights. Whether or not he indeed has such a right, I realize that some people may have trouble reading this letter. Granted, not everyone knows what "anthropoteleological" means, but it's nevertheless easy to understand that Mertjuh's semi-intelligible, bitter press releases abandon the idea of universal principles and focus illegitimately on the particular. Mertjuh then blames us for that. Now there's a prizewinning example of psychological projection if I've ever seen one. After all, if Mertjuh were as bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that by indiscriminately assigning value to practically everything, he has made "experience" all-important. Mertjuh's experiences, however, are detached from any consideration of what is good or true, which means that they will almost certainly truck away our freedoms for safekeeping before the year is over.
I promise you, again and again and again, that I will never force me to undergo "treatment" to cure my "problem". Mertjuh, on the other hand, is so eager to do exactly that that he's already begun making my blood curdle. The reason I'm distinguishing my actions from his here is that he says that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that he makes a lot of exaggerated claims. All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant's mother. Consider, for example, Mertjuh's claim that he is beyond reproach. The fact of the matter is that if he can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to hinder the power of indecent, lewd marauders like him.
The only weapons Mertjuh has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it. Accompanying this recognition of the indeterminateness of verifiability with regard to an external, objective reality has been a crisis regarding our ability to know that this cannot go on much longer. And I can say that with a clear conscience because if you don't think that he lusts for a world in which mumpish flakes support hostile governments known for human rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery, then you've missed the whole point of this letter.
Mertjuh coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his communications sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. He likes to cite poll results that "prove" that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that only the committed action of millions of concerned and politically active patriots united in their determination to work beyond the predatory plasticity of Mertjuh's mind games will be able to follow knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: Mertjuh's behavior is very dangerous and very destructive.
Mertjuh claims that his bait-and-switch tactics prevent smallpox. I, however, warrant that that's a load of crud. Yes, his little schemes are bound to fail, but I'm sure he wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his conversations. So why does Mertjuh want to regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers? The answer is not obvious because he contends that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from?
If you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, Mertjuh turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten the most sick rascals you'll ever see into leading to the destruction of the human race. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, I've never bothered Mertjuh. Yet Mertjuh wants to make my stomach turn. Whatever happened to "live and let live"? I could accept, perhaps, jibes backed by the forces of logic and powerful reasoning. Platitudes marked with hypocrisy and contradiction, however, merit none of my respect. Mertjuh wants to teach the next generation how to hate—and whom to hate. Is this so he can contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply, or is it to shame the poor into blaming themselves for losing the birth lottery? You be the judge. In either case, he has blood on his hands. Yet Mertjuh pretends to be an innocent lamb who has our best interests at heart. We all know the reality: If he really had our best interests at heart, he wouldn't twist the teaching of history to suit his spiteful purposes.
Let me offer some free advice to Mertjuh's operatives: Stop laying waste to the environment! Mertjuh's assertions always follow the same pattern. He puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to pander to our worst fears. A few days ago, Mertjuh actually admitted that he wants to play on people's conscious and unconscious belief structures. Can you believe that? Perhaps Mertjuh forgot to take his antipsychotics that day. An additional clue is that many people think of his contumelious vaporings as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which rabid fast-buck artists will sweep Mertjuh's peccadillos under the rug by the next full moon. A second all-too-serious item is that my goal is to look into the future and consider what will happen if we let Mertjuh change children's values from those taught in the home to those considered chic by deluded mountebanks. I will not stint in my labor in this direction. When I have succeeded, the whole world will know that I stand by what I've written before, that I surely profess that many of Mertjuh's threats have been criticized for being slanted in favor of a particular stance. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that with all their sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, his offhand remarks are totally self-satisfied. In view of that, it is not surprising that there is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as poststructuralism or nihilism. Specifically, Mertjuh wins ninnyhammers over to his side using big words like "pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis". Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it undoubtedly expresses how today, we might have let Mertjuh create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest of human threats. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will punish Mertjuh for his capricious anecdotes.
I obviously hope you're not being misled by the "new Mertjuh". Only his methods and tactics have changed. Mertjuh's goal is still the same: to trick our children into adopting unconventional, disapproved-of opinions and ways of life. That's why I'm telling you that if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong. He's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath. That's all I have to say. Thanks for letting me express my feelings.
wtf jake? this release was funny, but you're making it sound like it was great with all these remarks. flaming is bad, but used sparingly against those that are being arrogant enough to write a 11 paragraph essay on why a guy fails is taking it too far.
i bet i could code anything you code /jake's arrogance
ok I see that you believe that this release was useless. It is true and you are not wrong. You're an idiot for believing that I actually typed that essay up. I only made the first part, and a generator made the rest. You seem almost "as worthless" as you put it as mertjuh. I appreciate your standing up for the thread, but please keep your rude comments to yourself.
you still haven't addressed my argument of you being arrogant. we know you're decent and that you've even been a member of xotic i think and shoot, but you're taking this a bit far are you. and i'm worthless for stating the truth?
I realize that I cannot reason with a person with no logic and reason. Tell me where I stated that I was better than anyone else, including you. I think you're the arrogant one. This will be the last comment I will have on this matter. I'm sure you're a great coder, but let's not start a war.