[v83?] Some More Releases ( New !item Command )

I took the freedom (With his semi-permission via MSN) to edit Veda's post in order to stop the drama and add my own version of Wedding stuff. I don't have the time to add the Database stuff into the MapleCharacter part, however it's simple.

You just need to add a part to save the couple name and in the load part, you just need to load the couple name, load a MapleCharacter object for the attribute "couple" and set "engaged" equals to true if the couple does indeed exist in the db.

I made it in Notepad++ so I'm sorry if I made any typo, not really much time to improve or what not.

Said this, there should be no more author request thing problems. However, I would like that for futures references... ask out for proof before doing this based on user status.

Okay, so here's where it's at. This is why you don't trust people who say they are the author of things. I recently received a PM from the "Author" showing a picture of when his file containing it was last updated, and it showed somewhere in June or May of 2011. ( I can't post it as he wanted it private. ) This is where I based mine off of:
http://forum.ragezone.com/f427/relea...source-641537/

From this, you can see it was released sometime back in January 2010, way before this guy can date his code.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Veda

Okay, so here's where it's at. This is why you don't trust people who say they are the author of things. I recently received a PM from the "Author" showing a picture of when his file containing it was last updated, and it showed somewhere in June or May of 2011. ( I can't post it as he wanted it private. ) This is where I based mine off of:
http://forum.ragezone.com/f427/relea...source-641537/

From this, you can see it was released sometime back in January 2010, way before this guy can date his code.

---

I've coded things months or even years ago, and I randomly open them and change/improve small parts of some of them. That doesn't mean I wrote the code on that date.

Anyway, this whole "proof" concept is ridiculous to me, I just don't see how someone can ACTUALLY prove that they coded something unless they have a number of people to support them and verify their claims; code gets tossed around and modified all the time and it's incredibly difficult to trace it back to the author especially when it's just a small snippet (like the issue at hand).

Ignoring this guy just because no "valid proof" is presented (extremely stupid, there's just no way someone can claim a method as theirs and have sufficient evidence to back it up) is indefensible and rather shallow. Assume he is the author and put yourself in his shoes, where no one believes you simply because you didn't happen to take a video documenting yourself writing the code or some bullshit like that. It's unfair.
I don't mean to cause any disputes but I really think the easiest way to solve this is to create a similar yet different system to accomplish the same purpose (as Osi already kindly did).

How would you make the Wedding command stuff into v55 format?