Itak-Protect

[DriftCity]

You heard it people, the antihack is kind useless xD and yes it can be shut down easy.
Use at own risk.

[Intelligence]

I thought it's useful (cause I knew that this antihack is great) but alot of people saying it's useless due to outdated :S

[Improved]

I thought it's useful (cause I knew that this antihack is great) but alot of people saying it's useless due to outdated :S

Why do you think it's useful when it's only opening more holes than what it's closing?

[Intelligence]

Why do you think it's useful when it's only opening more holes than what it's closing?

Don't get what you saying. You're just making the way too far.
I wrote that means that it's true that other people says it's useless, not saying it's useful ..

[Yahoo404]

I don't recommend this application. -invalid face change
-perin buy bug can be easily fixed in flyff source code. Other reason is, this application was made in vb6, it has only 1 thread. Hacker can easily spam the connection listener.

And lastly, it has 1 backdoor. I can shutdown the application not the CPU.

My words is true. Itakpro have a Backdoor

Better may use Tom94 antihack.

[Akerius]

if this is the old version of itakpro, i wonder why some have interest in this, as fas as i know, the equivalent version of this was the 6.8.3 or ??? lower version of toms which can be easily injected...

[Slingshot]

if this is the old version of itakpro, i wonder why some have interest in this, as fas as i know, the equivalent version of this was the 6.8.3 or ??? lower version of toms which can be easily injected...

It seems that those who are interested on this old version of anti hack is that, Their servers don't have an antihack and won't pay for one, So they'll use a free one that's released.