v.109.2 Localhost

[kevintjuh93]

First of all, sorry Hendi, lol.

Before all you guys are going to say that it does not work, test it yourself it DOES work.

It is not made by me.
Credits to anonymous guy who wants to stay anonymous. I won't reply any post or pm about the creator or something like that!

Download link:

To view the content, you need to sign in or register

To view the content, you need to sign in or register

Have fun, updating to v109.

 

[Diamondo25]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

STREDIT works with this.

 

[Buya]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

The redirector is more flexible, but let's see if this will be the "new v0.83".

EDIT: Removed the name of the creator due to requests by certain pro's.

 

[Yaseen]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

Holy ****. That is all.

 

[pauljeki]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

Can edit this localhost to wan ip?

 

[kevintjuh93]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

Can edit this localhost to wan ip?

You can use STREDIT for that. It's in this section.

 

[Yaseen]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

Now, exactly which packets need to be updated in order for the localhost to get to login/in game?

inb4 NOOB

 

[Diamondo25]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

Now, exactly which packets need to be updated in order for the localhost to get to login/in game?

inb4 NOOB

Comparing with...?

 

[Tsundere]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

Now, exactly which packets need to be updated in order for the localhost to get to login/in game?

inb4 NOOB

Comparing with v83 I assume? Quite a lot. Comparing with v97? Still quite a lot!

This will definitely help when I update to v1.09 in the future.

 

[Xerdox]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

localhost v109.1? Interesting! I hope this will move servers from v83 , Guys, have fun with updating packets D:

 

[lolwutwat]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

nice, doubt anyone except the pros will be able to update since we are SO FAR BEHIND!

 

[kevintjuh93]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

Please no talking about how to update a server. If you can't do it, just keep trying to follow Moogra's guide on how to update. This thread is about the localhost not about how to make a v109 server.

 

[Sexy]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

Wow thanks kevin this is will be a big impact to the servers out there now.

 

[greenelfx]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

(noob here)
I commonly see random localhost releases, why is one different?

 

[Sublime]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

^ Lol what?

We've been stuck on v83 servers forever because that version at the moment, is one of the only versions (aside from the ones pre-83) that have a stable source.

Main reason why v97 servers aren't as popular (though a localhost is released) is because there isn't a stable source. I'm going to assume that v1.09 servers won't go mainstream cause no one knows how to upgrade (aside from the usual developers that do know how).

Example would be Kevin upgrading Moople to 109, then releasing it and allowing the public to use it like he did with Moople83

This localhost won't make that big of an impact ; again unless an at least <usuable> source is released (usuable means yes; better than what noobjiki released)

and actually, localhosts AREN'T that common.

a v62 localhost was hard to come by (anyone remember those kiki files?) , and when it was v62 went mainstream. and then a v75 localhost was released, then it went <sort of> mainstream, and then finally a v83 was released (after a bit of time) and v83 went mainstream. We've been stuck with 83 for.... 1-2 years now. Main reason why v88s aren't mainstream would be because of the fact that there's no localhost for it.

Nontheless; thank you for the release.

 

[Diamondo25]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

^ Lol what?

We've been stuck on v83 servers forever because that version at the moment, is one of the only versions (aside from the ones pre-83) that have a stable source.

Main reason why v97 servers aren't as popular (though a localhost is released) is because there isn't a stable source. I'm going to assume that v1.09 servers won't go mainstream cause no one knows how to upgrade (aside from the usual developers that do know how).

Example would be Kevin upgrading Moople to 109, then releasing it and allowing the public to use it like he did with Moople83

This localhost won't make that big of an impact ; again unless an at least <usuable> source is released (usuable means yes; better than what noobjiki released)

and actually, localhosts AREN'T that common.

a v62 localhost was hard to come by (anyone remember those kiki files?) , and when it was v62 went mainstream. and then a v75 localhost was released, then it went <sort of> mainstream, and then finally a v83 was released (after a bit of time) and v83 went mainstream. We've been stuck with 83 for.... 1-2 years now. Main reason why v88s aren't mainstream would be because of the fact that there's no localhost for it.

Nontheless; thank you for the release.

As an addition, some people think that redirectors (those clients that run apart from the game) are localhosts, which is incorrect.

 

[sunnyboy]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

The localhost itself doesn't change anything really since there is no source out there. Although it would give some people motivation to start developing in the public.

 

[greenelfx]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

^ Lol what?

We've been stuck on v83 servers forever because that version at the moment, is one of the only versions (aside from the ones pre-83) that have a stable source.

Main reason why v97 servers aren't as popular (though a localhost is released) is because there isn't a stable source. I'm going to assume that v1.09 servers won't go mainstream cause no one knows how to upgrade (aside from the usual developers that do know how).

Example would be Kevin upgrading Moople to 109, then releasing it and allowing the public to use it like he did with Moople83

This localhost won't make that big of an impact ; again unless an at least <usuable> source is released (usuable means yes; better than what noobjiki released)

and actually, localhosts AREN'T that common.

a v62 localhost was hard to come by (anyone remember those kiki files?) , and when it was v62 went mainstream. and then a v75 localhost was released, then it went <sort of> mainstream, and then finally a v83 was released (after a bit of time) and v83 went mainstream. We've been stuck with 83 for.... 1-2 years now. Main reason why v88s aren't mainstream would be because of the fact that there's no localhost for it.

Nontheless; thank you for the release.

I see, thanks for explaining.

 

[oxysoft]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

The localhost itself doesn't change anything really since there is no source out there. Although it would give some people motivation to start developing in the public.

i don't even bother with anything that require loopback / redirector. :blink:

 

[Veda]

Re: v.109.1 Localhost

A v109.1 Localhost? Why do I feel like this has Spudgy written all over it...

Maybe it's the fact he's the best at unpacking, removing thermidia, etc.

If it is him, welcome back. If not, great work nonetheless. Time to update from v107 > v109. Any major packet changes?