K5 compile & Debug Tantra
wow nice
This guy is working hard and I am watching hard as well with his work. I wonder how far Tantra go with this recent development.
Yes! I hope he will released the source k5 for us to continue tantra development !Originally Posted by A v a r a
Lmao, please stop. You dont develop. Period.
Yes .i am how about you?
- - - Updated - - -
And btw what was your contribution here? Lmao í ¾í´£
Simple, if you're "DEVELOPER" you dont have to beg for release. Thats about it. lmao
I don't know what you mean with "working hard", but if is because he shows a video where he compile DBSRV and ZONESRV, I will tell you that anyone who have those sources files can do that, and believe me, is not hard work at all.
The HARD WORK will be: to add on those sources files (k5) the code added by Hanbit on k6.2 (last release made by Hanbit), for example: those source files don't have the code for the BOARDS, the Pets, and a lot more.
Whatever bro. These things we ordinary people seeing is not normal to us, especially from @tandev01. So don't blame me I called this hard work :). I am only an ordinary citizen.
Ciao!
Bro lmao í ½í¸‚
Oh I guess I am too masculine with the word Black lol. No filter intended.
Now I understand why @master_unknown answer the way he does.
If what he shows is "NOT NORMAL" that only means that you have never compiled a program.
And I was not blaming you, I was just saying that compiling an existing code is not a hard work, and if by any chance you found those source files, add them on VC and compile it, then you will understand what I was trying to say.
Regards
Hahaha...Whatever dearest GM Black a.k.a Eliana...I have nothing to brag about though..I am enjoying seeing you posting those kinds of line...Now I am going to retract my recent post and let me tell you now that its "EASY" to compile existing code if that's what you want. :)
Btw, I am excited to see your next post.
Ciao!
Her point was not to encourage post like OP did that is "hard work".
It never was, its just boast-posting to be honest. Nothing new.
I'm pleased to see that at least one understand my point.
Of his video the only thing that I'm curious to know is: if he managed the _Xlen and _Xran same as I did, and why he compiled DBSRV on 2013 toolset when can be compiled with 2017
And if he thinks i'm asking because im not able to compile:
And what I did to solve the the _Xlen and _Xran issue (because Microsoft changed the signature of those) was to follow Dmitry Ilukhin post in this thread: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...2008-to-vs2010
Last edited by Reaguee; 11-09-18 at 09:08 PM.
Reply With Quote