C++ supports OOP, but it is not object oriented. Please go back to school.Originally Posted by The General
C++ is definitely not the most widely used language anymore. You apply for a job at Google, Facebook, or any other tech giant, they aren't looking for C++ developers. They want Java, C#, Python, JavaScript, PHP, Ruby, etc. I know this because I've been researching internships and jobs for my last few years of college.
Please stop you're making a fool out of yourself.
C++ is a multi-paradigm programming language supporting
functional
imperative
object-oriented
template meta programming
The idea is that C++ is not just an OO language but more.
Define what you call OO or get out because you don't even give arguments all you try to do is convince me of the garbage thats in your head by your brainwashing school. LOL.
I'd be fired if I tell my coworkers that C++ is not OO.
Depends what department. Their search algorithms are all written in C++ (MapReduce, BigTable etc)
And most software you run on your little windows (LOL) computer is C++.
Sources:
http://www.stroustrup.com/oopsla.pdf (<<< author of C++)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Search
http://static.googleusercontent.com/...uce-osdi04.pdf
Last edited by The General; 02-04-16 at 03:00 PM.
OOP isn't intrinsic to C++. You can write a program in C++ without using OOP at all.
Thats what he said...?
Which is basically what Wreckless originally said.. The operative word being 'supports'.
I'm not saying C++ is a bad language, I'm just saying it's not the most widely used language.
Maybe your little Windows computer runs everything on C++ because most of the software for it was developed years ago.
OO is OO, if I have to define that for you, maybe you should go back to school.
C++ is not by default object oriented. C++ is in essence a procedural style of programming. Like I said, OO is an option, but it's not the primary purpose of C++.
My Top Programming School in the Country*
My big Linux Computer*
Btw when can we expect your emulator, my estimate is 2025 based on the rate you're going.
Why does everything have to be an argument with you? I don't think discussion is within your capable intellect.
C# and Java for the purposes of this section are better options. They are simpler syntactically and algorithmically. I'm not knocking the C++ language especially considering its one of the most powerful languages out there.
Thats what I said. Its a multi paradigm language meaning you can use it for multiple paradigms.
No. He didn't. If you read it again he said:
I think the original C++ author knows better than @WrecklessC++ supports OOP, but it is not object oriented
Your arguements are just a joke.
Windows is written in C++, kernel in C
Mac is written in Objective C, kernel in C
Linux is written in C, KDE in C++
Saying not widely used is just a joke and therefor the ignorant. Everything comes from C/C++.
Based on C which is already imperative, C++ was intended to be OO by adding support for classes and polymorphism. Something which C lacked. C++ has then been improved by adding meta template programming and functional support.
Everything has been derived from C, PHP is written in C, C# comes from C++, C++ comes from C.
And no OO is not an option for C++. It is its inteded way of being used. Its basically saying well I can do imperative programming in Java, so its not a object-oriented language either. If you want a pure OO programming language then I suggest you to use SmallTalk. Oh wait thats 40 years old. Therefor outdated and shouldnt be used. Atleast, according to your 'logic'.
Its already released, 2 months ago.
Well. He's still correct. It isn't an object oriented language fundamentally, it's merely supported.
Nice facts, Google some more.
The more you argue this, the stupider you look because I'm not disagreeing with you.
C++ is an option, but it is not object oriented. It supports OOP, but it is not OO.
If you want to program one in C++, be my guest. It's just not a viable option for the community considering its syntax is more complex and it is a PROCEDURAL paradigm at the end of the day.
It supports Object Oriented but it is not object oriented.
Last edited by Taiga; 04-04-16 at 02:51 AM. Reason: Don't post memes
This is getting ridiculous now...
Yeah it is just hard to tell brainwashed people from the USA's best school otherwise.
I'm not sure if he is just trolling or stupid.
But yes answer to your question; its possible but takes more effort. The amount of effort people rather not want to take. Being lazy they just prefer C# because butterfly is already there and it is much more easier to mess around with that than taking a bit of effort to write something from scratch.
It's only getting ridiculous because you continue to argue over something so childish. It's legitimately just semantics. It's like arguing over who shot first Han or Greedo? It really makes no difference which it is. There's a difference between being OOP and supporting OOP. While yes, C++ is technically multi-paradigm, it is not simply OO. Primitive data types are not objects and I know now you're going to start bitching that it's the same thing with Java. When you call it OO, you limit it to that, and it's not just OO, it's multi-paradigm therefore it is not OO, it supports OO.
You can insult me and my country all you like, but the more you do that, you just look like more of an asshole who needs to insult people to feel like he won an argument. A stupid argument at that. Does it satisfy you to win arguments on the internet? Because you are a douchebag, the fact that you felt the need to message me on Skype and start crying like a little kid in a toy store shows that you have serious anger issues. Keep googling facts and complaining because it really is just a joke to me.
I'm not on about Client-Side usage. I'm on about building an entire website back-end a la PHP, ASP.NET, JSP, etc. but compiled. Your website requires no Apache, no Nginx, unless you want to use them to proxy your website, it is compiled into machine code. Your layouts are compiled into your .exe file in the case of windows. C++ is not really big on back-end web development typically, Go is probably better for that anyway (a lot less code). Idk why you seem to act high and mighty when you have issues reading basic posts, I don't use big words, English is my second language after all.
Dude I don't understand why you can't understand that, you said C++ is multi-paradigm, that literally means that it can be programmed in any paradigm you're comfortable with. English is not my first language and I understand that much, it's not that hard. So high and mighty you behave in these forums, but you can't seem to grasp simple programming ideas. Python is the same, you can code Object Oriented, or you can choose not to, that doesn't stop it from being an Object Oriented language, same with PHP, Perl, Ruby, etc. heck D can do the same as well. I can either make a bunch of functions in one file, or I can make a class and make the relevant parts Object Oriented.
is so funny threads where people discuss what language is better, or what language do X thing, and forget about the main reason from thread
