360 games

The Final Fantasy franchise was suppose to come out on Xbox to begin with, Sony threatened a lawsuit on Xbox if they dared. Intially Final Fantasy 12 was suppose to come out for Xbox, just a little fun fact. They had this in an Xbox magazine and an old Electronic Gaming(I think thats the title). Xbox is a new brand, so what? Sony was new when Nintendo was holding the big boy pants. Sony is now handing their molted underwear to Xbox; the 360 will clean those nasty things :)

[EDIT]
Perfect Dark Zero is going to suck hard.

Halo was one of the worst shooter games I have ever played. Terrain detail is terrible, gameplay sucks and the story makes almost no sense. Playing multiplayer on Halo is even worse, I put about 30-50 shots in someone's head and they kill me twice by shooting me in the leg.

Besides Halo what "great hits" does Xbox have? Absolutely none. Sure you can brag about how much better the graphics are when I hardly see a difference. Then you can talk about all the games that are coming out for xbox, that were originally made for Sony's PS2. Did I mention you have to carry around xbox controllers instead of slim little memory cards to play someone else's file?

Sony is the best in game development. While Bill Gates wipes his @$$ with his million dollar bills, Sony is off making greater games then he has ever even dreamed of.

Someone asked:
Q: "If Bill Gates is such a failure, why does he have so much money?"
A: Him and a group of his friends gathered up and created a company named "Microsoft." Which developed Operating Systems for Computers. Not that he had the first Operating System for a PC, but his was a modded version of Apple's junky OS.

If you think he made 59 Billion Dollars off selling Xbox's, you must live on some other planet.

Halo Pwns any other shooter game over the net...This game was rated the best in the world, so i wouldnt be complaining dude :icon6:

Purple sony dont develope games and Bill didnt have much control over the xbox in production. The only reason why sony's ps2 has the better game titles is because the ps2 was the only next gen console at hand soon after came the gc and xbox.

What I meant to say is games made for Sony productions such as the PS2 are under the Sony title.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Purplepill

Halo was one of the worst shooter games I have ever played. Terrain detail is terrible, gameplay sucks and the story makes almost no sense. Playing multiplayer on Halo is even worse, I put about 30-50 shots in someone's head and they kill me twice by shooting me in the leg.
Besides Halo what "great hits" does Xbox have? Absolutely none. Sure you can brag about how much better the graphics are when I hardly see a difference. Then you can talk about all the games that are coming out for xbox, that were originally made for Sony's PS2. Did I mention you have to carry around xbox controllers instead of slim little memory cards to play someone else's file?
Sony is the best in game development. While Bill Gates wipes his @$$ with his million dollar bills, Sony is off making greater games then he has ever even dreamed of.
Someone asked:
Q: "If Bill Gates is such a failure, why does he have so much money?"
A: Him and a group of his friends gathered up and created a company named "Microsoft." Which developed Operating Systems for Computers. Not that he had the first Operating System for a PC, but his was a modded version of Apple's junky OS.
If you think he made 59 Billion Dollars off selling Xbox's, you must live on some other planet.

---

seriously...your whole arguement is the whole sony vs. ms thing........dude you dont even make sense... did you know that sony DOESNT make games? they *might* publish them yes but they dont DEVELOP them you or even publish all of them moron...there are other companies like activision, atari, etc etc that publish games

and like tsuki said, it was the only next gen console that was around the market thats why the game library would be so much bigger or even better...

and its even sadder to see you talking about halo as a bad shooter just because you either a) **** at it hence the 30-50 'shots to the head' or b) your comp sucks or c) dont even have xbox

you are also probably thinking that ms sucks because bill gates sucks but i also bet you are using windows right now
sigh the ps2 is such an old piece of hardware now...so wait for ps3 and 360 to come out before you go around saying xbox is a POS because its got more meat then you XD

other games that owned? KOTOR, Fable, Halo series, ninja gaiden omg the list goes on and on...you are so deep in your denial that you dont even know that there ARE good games on xbox....

I would also like to establish that Macantosh was the founding company, which had Bill Gates in its repetoire. Bill Gates didn't like the direction, or salary, and split off into IBM. Then founded Microsoft, the software company, later on. He founded Microsoft while working for IBM.

STOP THIS DEBATE, it's stupid!

Quote:

---

seriously...your whole arguement is the whole sony vs. ms thing........dude you dont even make sense... did you know that sony DOESNT make games? they *might* publish them yes but they dont DEVELOP them you or even publish all of them moron...there are other companies like activision, atari, etc etc that publish games

and like tsuki said, it was the only next gen console that was around the market thats why the game library would be so much bigger or even better...

and its even sadder to see you talking about halo as a bad shooter just because you either a) suck ass at it hence the 30-50 'shots to the head' or b) your comp sucks or c) dont even have xbox

you are also probably thinking that ms sucks because bill gates sucks but i also bet you are using windows right now
sigh the ps2 is such an old piece of hardware now...so wait for ps3 and 360 to come out before you go around saying xbox is a POS because its got more meat then you XD

other games that owned? KOTOR, Fable, Halo series, ninja gaiden omg the list goes on and on...you are so deep in your denial that you dont even know that there ARE good games on xbox....

---

You obviously didnt read my latest post. I meant to say Sony publishes games, not develops them.

a)Yes I suck at Halo. (Mainly because I dont play it 16 hours a day, or any hours at all)
b)I am talking about Xbox not PC's you dumb f***
c)Yeah I dont have Xbox but somehow I manage to play xbox games.

None of those games listed I enjoyed. Fable is very short, you can beat it in a day and the story sucks and the gameplay is okay.

You effin' moron. KOTOR was produced by LucasArts and Published by Sony. Microsoft bought the rights to make it on Xbox. You cant even name good games, the ones you do name were not made for Xbox in the first place.

Of course I am using Windows right now, the other alternative is MAC which no games are supported by, and it is only for business use. And their latest video card is the 9800 PRO. It came out years ago for Windows but Macintosh just got it.

totally gone off subject dude.

Title of thread is '360 games', not 'lets have a debate about macintosh and windows and how bad I suck at halo'

bad temper at the moment, going to cool off.

Bye.

Im actualy nto so sure I think ill wait for the day and buy ><

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Purplepill

Can't believe Squaresoft is allowing Microsoft to produce their products. Microsoft does not deserve such a great title. Since Bill Gates can't make his own games and has realized his are no good, why steal a perfect Sony title?
XBOX has 2 advantages over Sony.
1. Great online gameplay
2. Graphics are a bit better.
Disadvantages:
1. XBOX live fee
2. Made by Bill Gates.
3. All games made by Microsoft are no good.
4. Most games come out for Sony.
5. Only up to 4 players per television (without LAN/Network play)
XBOX is BS in almost every perspective. It is a wannabe clone of a PS2. That will never sell as much, and not as many people will ever like it. It's like people saying HL2 is better over Doom 3. When all HL2 is, is a baddly modded version of Doom 3 with worse graphics and a similar story. It is not the original, and it will never be better then Sony. Bill Gates still has to get over the fact that no matter how much money and time he puts into his products they are still going to end up to be a failure.

---

Ummm dude, the Xbox is vastly superior in graphics, loading times, and all aspects of gaming in those terms , Bill gates does not head the Xbox, it has its own management *DUH*, Sony isnt the originoal, Sony is a copy, Nintendo is teh origional, Xbox and Sony are copies, Xbox Live, fudge dude, why should it be free? nothign is free, especialyl not an online gaming service. and the reason Squaresoft chose to go the Playstation way was because they adopted the CD style gaming which supported mroe storage over the n64, since then, squaresoft has been in debate, because Xbox is a highly advantegous system, and the 360 is literally out of this world with its computing power, think of it as a gigantic GPU, 3 processors runnign at 3.2GHz, massive pipelines, and huge processing speed.. it will blow away whatever playstation has coming...


Before you bash a company, look up the facts, it will help us all from having to correct you:-)


*breathes* Sorry, had to let that loose... I hate close minded people, lol... soooo, anyone ever get max level and all the cars on forza motorsports? im sitting at 92% right now :-)

i hate ps2 they aint for me xbox'sare i tryed to get my ps2 online but no luck

when your playing online xbox is the best (made for online gaming. if you have a ps2 then you just play with your mates and ps2 games are dull and dismal i got bored of almost everygame i owned on the ps2.

anybody who says xbox is gay is mistaken until you buy one you'll never know

ill go for ps3 tbh ._."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tsuki

Halo 3 isnt a release date title

---

Halo 3: Q2 2006

According to gamespot....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Polman05

Halo 3: Q2 2006
According to gamespot....

---

Halo 3:Release of ps3 or so ive heard so thats q2 or q4/q1'07