Call of Duty is supposed to be war based yet they include vehicles that resemble the Star Wars 'Atat walkers' it's just unrealistic, quite disappointed to be honest.
Printable View
Call of Duty is supposed to be war based yet they include vehicles that resemble the Star Wars 'Atat walkers' it's just unrealistic, quite disappointed to be honest.
Not really big on how futuristic it looks.
It won't be good as the first one from how it looks.
Will definitely be giving this one a miss, like everyone else has said the trailer looks nothing like Call Of Duty. Yes I agree that they have to bring new things to the game, to an extent but this just seems like too much.
Such a waste to buy a Call of Duty game because 5 month later a new one is already out and you didn't even start enjoying the previous one. Waste of money.
12 months, actually. They release around November each year.
Am I the only one who likes this :D ?
Call of 12 Year Olds 2...oh boy...
Oh and here's a more realistic trailer
BLACK OPS 2 WORLD REVEAL TRAILER - YouTube
Kind of funny if you think of it. People wanted them to try something new because they were becoming weary of the old run n gun thing. They decide to listen and try to see how far it would go but yet they are already getting negative responses.
Whereas no one has seen MP footage to see how it pans out.
Posted via Mobile Device
Well trying new things is a risk that they in my opinion should of taken, it's just the one that they've chosen upon in my opinion is the wrong one. Definitely not a fan of how it looks but as always multiplayer footage and reviews could prove people wrong, I think I'd still rather play the others.
oh wait, it looks like every other call of duty.....
Also, graphically it looks waaaaay behind.
I just watched the trailer and honestly thought it was a big joke... to my surprise it wasn't and I don't know why I would have ever assumed it would be anything else other than a joke considering it's a call of duty game.
While you all make valid and agreeable points, I still find it funny. It's Call of Duty, wars, person vs person - Black Ops 2 still aims at that. They took at futuristic approach, and in my opinion, is a fresh new start and could lead to something bigger. I'm just hoping they don't take away the "fast pace" like they did in Black Ops 1 (you can disagree and point out I'm wrong on this but to me, it feels like they did).
Like I said when a friend of mine showed me the video, I've always wanted to see a futuristic Call of Duty however they kinda... overreached(?) this one. Still, I'll defiantly give it a shot.
Overreached? Way over-overreached. The war should be based like the war TODAY as they haven't ever done it in every Call of Duty. I think the only Afghan map I've ever seen on any Call of Duty game was Afghan in MW2, other than that no other map nor any other game has been based around the Afghan war, what is the most current war and what has been raging for years, yet instead of adopting the story of today with the war in Afghanistan, they decide to take a 'futuristic' approach using things that aren't even used in Star Trek, and try to incorporate it describing it as 'future war' yet it probably wont even ever be like that in any war.