Call of Duty: World at War

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jamie

I beat CoD4 in a couple of hours, the story was really bad, but Multiplayer saved CoD4. What i want is a large array of weapons, not just limited to like 15 - 20, and make them fully customizable.

---

What new weapons can they bring to a WW2 time line, either way all WW2 games i've played were shit.

And no COD doesn't need to stay at WW2, just like Battlefield started out...it developed and continued to develop. Truth is, people want these military type games to be based in the present time... battlefield tried doing a future version, and it failed...and if battlefield went back to ww2, the truth is it would fail...and that's what COD is doing.

Imo COD4 campaign mode was the best part about the game...beat it on the hardest mode, and it took me a few days - a few hours each day. Story was good, effects were awesome, graphics perfect...COd4 campaign mode experience was by far the best I've had compared to any other game up to date.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wounded

What new weapons can they bring to a WW2 time line, either way all WW2 games i've played were shit.

And no COD doesn't need to stay at WW2, just like Battlefield started out...it developed and continued to develop. Truth is, people want these military type games to be based in the present time... battlefield tried doing a future version, and it failed...and if battlefield went back to ww2, the truth is it would fail...and that's what COD is doing.

Imo COD4 campaign mode was the best part about the game...beat it on the hardest mode, and it took me a few days - a few hours each day. Story was good, effects were awesome, graphics perfect...COd4 campaign mode experience was by far the best I've had compared to any other game up to date.

---

Infact, i have CoD3 for the PS2, what am i talking about. imo, that campaign rocked.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jamie

Infact, i have CoD3 for the PS2, what am i talking about. imo, that campaign rocked.

---

I have it for 360. there were like 2-3 close combat things and like 13 levels that were far too short. i beat it in a weekend, i was VERY dissapointed

Looks good.

if Treyarch fucks it up, im calling Tech support and bitching them out like i did to microsoft when they said Madden 08 was on the Disc replacement programs I HAVE NO MADDEN TO PLAY ;[ its like not having sex. its horrible.

Oh Nice

Oh fantastic - yet another WWII CoD, 4 player online, don't they realise that big 16-player modern-based war games are big hits?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Laz-low

Oh fantastic - yet another WWII CoD, 4 player online, don't they realise that big 16-player modern-based war games are big hits?

---

They mean 4 player co-op.

COD4 was a joke single player like and multiplayer too. I dont know why people love it, another Blant FPS shooter, nothing new. COD5 looks intresting, but! I think we're all honestly tired of WW2 shooters....and no, this is not a hater post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LightWarrior

COD4 was a joke single player like and multiplayer too. I dont know why people love it, another Blant FPS shooter, nothing new. COD5 looks intresting, but! I think we're all honestly tired of WW2 shooters....and no, this is not a hater post.

---

Not to flame or anything. Your a joke if you think that of CoD4. CoD3 was a peice of shit. a 6-8 hour campaign. WOW thats fucking great isnt it?

CoD4 ftw. you just dont like it. cause you get owned when you go online. or you cant afford to buy it.

and if Treyarch fucks up CoD5. Im calling there Tech Support. :P They Fucked up CoD3, they wont ruin another CoD

I wonder if more people will start playing the CoD5 then 4 when they find it its WW2

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LightWarrior

COD4 was a joke single player like and multiplayer too. I dont know why people love it, another Blant FPS shooter, nothing new. COD5 looks intresting, but! I think we're all honestly tired of WW2 shooters....and no, this is not a hater post.

---

I only agree about the single player. The gameplay was good, but the length of it was laughable. I completed it on the XBOX in around 5 or 6 hours. The multiplayer however, is one of the most intense I've experienced. So how can you say the multiplayer is a joke? It's fantastic tbh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jamie

I beat CoD4 in a couple of hours, the story was really bad, but Multiplayer saved CoD4. What i want is a large array of weapons, not just limited to like 15 - 20, and make them fully customizable.

---

You talk silly-ness
cod4 campaign was the best part about it, story was great and gameplay was too. Online was average, there are better online games out there but not better fps campaign.


CoD:WW looks pretty good, im liking the idea of 4 player co-op online. Btw i believe this isnt CoD5 and when cod5 is out it will be modern warfare again, as the story from cod4 could easily be continued. This is just a little money making scheme for cod5

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Agape

You talk silly-ness
cod4 campaign was the best part about it, story was great and gameplay was too. Online was average, there are better online games out there but not better fps campaign.


CoD:WW looks pretty good, im liking the idea of 4 player co-op online. Btw i believe this isnt CoD5 and when cod5 is out it will be modern warfare again, as the story from cod4 could easily be continued. This is just a little money making scheme for cod5

---

Ask your self this, Do we really need another WW game? I am tired of them tbh.

So sick of WW2 games...